一所理工大学物理课程学生混合式学习体验之探讨

M. Basitere, E. Ivala
{"title":"一所理工大学物理课程学生混合式学习体验之探讨","authors":"M. Basitere, E. Ivala","doi":"10.4314/JSDA.V32I1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The '#FeesMustFall' students protest movement in South African Higher Education Institutions sparked critical discourse on Blended Learning as an approach to supplement conventional on campus contact (face-to face) lectures. This approach, however, needs careful consideration in its implementation due to its inherent resourceintense nature, which poses challenges in settings that are poorly resourced. For instance, there is a danger that it may further accentuate digital divide, marginalizing poorly resourced communities, and thus necessitates great caution in its implementation. This paper presents and discusses students' experiences of Blended Learning through their interaction with the adaptive medium WileyPLUS system and social medium WhatsApp group platform in a Physics course supplementing face to face classroom teaching. The data was generated through student focus group interviews, WhatsApp group discussions and students' results in both WileyPLUS and paper-based assessments.  The results show that students who lived in university residences with access to university resources such as computers and Wi-Fi had a greater chance of improving scores in the Physics course compared to students residing off-campus without the necessary resources such as personal computers and access to internet services. Furthermore, in the group of students residing off-campus, scores on online versus written assessments were discordant - students scored better on online tests than in written tests. This was attributed to cheating collaboration, as students residing offcampus reported to have collaborated with fellow students residing on campus in order to score higher points on WileyPLUS at the expense of failing to gain the required level of competency to perform equally well in written assessments. In conclusion, the findings in this paper alert universities to the potential challenges and implications of employing various technologies to support Blended Learning particularly in a developing country where resource limitations feature. Keywords: Blended Learning, Digital divide, #FeesMustFall, WileyPLUS, WhatsApp","PeriodicalId":85020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of social development in Africa","volume":"32 1","pages":"23-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An exploration of students experiences of Blended Learning in a physics course at a university of technology\",\"authors\":\"M. Basitere, E. Ivala\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/JSDA.V32I1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The '#FeesMustFall' students protest movement in South African Higher Education Institutions sparked critical discourse on Blended Learning as an approach to supplement conventional on campus contact (face-to face) lectures. This approach, however, needs careful consideration in its implementation due to its inherent resourceintense nature, which poses challenges in settings that are poorly resourced. For instance, there is a danger that it may further accentuate digital divide, marginalizing poorly resourced communities, and thus necessitates great caution in its implementation. This paper presents and discusses students' experiences of Blended Learning through their interaction with the adaptive medium WileyPLUS system and social medium WhatsApp group platform in a Physics course supplementing face to face classroom teaching. The data was generated through student focus group interviews, WhatsApp group discussions and students' results in both WileyPLUS and paper-based assessments.  The results show that students who lived in university residences with access to university resources such as computers and Wi-Fi had a greater chance of improving scores in the Physics course compared to students residing off-campus without the necessary resources such as personal computers and access to internet services. Furthermore, in the group of students residing off-campus, scores on online versus written assessments were discordant - students scored better on online tests than in written tests. This was attributed to cheating collaboration, as students residing offcampus reported to have collaborated with fellow students residing on campus in order to score higher points on WileyPLUS at the expense of failing to gain the required level of competency to perform equally well in written assessments. In conclusion, the findings in this paper alert universities to the potential challenges and implications of employing various technologies to support Blended Learning particularly in a developing country where resource limitations feature. Keywords: Blended Learning, Digital divide, #FeesMustFall, WileyPLUS, WhatsApp\",\"PeriodicalId\":85020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of social development in Africa\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"23-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of social development in Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/JSDA.V32I1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of social development in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/JSDA.V32I1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

南非高等教育机构的“学费必须下降”(#FeesMustFall)学生抗议运动引发了对混合式学习作为传统校园接触(面对面)讲座补充方式的批评。然而,由于这种方法本身资源密集的性质,在执行时需要仔细考虑,这在资源匮乏的环境中构成挑战。例如,它可能会进一步加剧数字鸿沟,使资源贫乏的社区边缘化,因此在实施时需要非常谨慎。本文介绍并讨论了学生在一门物理课程中,通过自适应媒体WileyPLUS系统和社交媒体WhatsApp群平台的互动,对混合式学习的体验进行了介绍和探讨。这些数据是通过学生焦点小组访谈、WhatsApp小组讨论以及学生在WileyPLUS和纸质评估中的结果产生的。结果表明,与住在校外、没有个人电脑和互联网服务等必要资源的学生相比,住在大学宿舍、可以使用电脑和Wi-Fi等大学资源的学生,物理课程成绩提高的机会更大。此外,在住在校外的学生群体中,在线考试和书面考试的分数是不一致的——学生在在线考试中的得分高于书面考试。这被归因于作弊合作,因为据报道,为了在WileyPLUS上获得更高的分数,居住在校外的学生与居住在校园的同学合作,而代价是未能获得所需的能力水平,从而在书面评估中取得同样好的成绩。总之,本文的研究结果提醒大学注意使用各种技术来支持混合式学习的潜在挑战和影响,特别是在资源有限的发展中国家。关键词:混合学习,数字鸿沟,#FeesMustFall, WileyPLUS, WhatsApp
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An exploration of students experiences of Blended Learning in a physics course at a university of technology
The '#FeesMustFall' students protest movement in South African Higher Education Institutions sparked critical discourse on Blended Learning as an approach to supplement conventional on campus contact (face-to face) lectures. This approach, however, needs careful consideration in its implementation due to its inherent resourceintense nature, which poses challenges in settings that are poorly resourced. For instance, there is a danger that it may further accentuate digital divide, marginalizing poorly resourced communities, and thus necessitates great caution in its implementation. This paper presents and discusses students' experiences of Blended Learning through their interaction with the adaptive medium WileyPLUS system and social medium WhatsApp group platform in a Physics course supplementing face to face classroom teaching. The data was generated through student focus group interviews, WhatsApp group discussions and students' results in both WileyPLUS and paper-based assessments.  The results show that students who lived in university residences with access to university resources such as computers and Wi-Fi had a greater chance of improving scores in the Physics course compared to students residing off-campus without the necessary resources such as personal computers and access to internet services. Furthermore, in the group of students residing off-campus, scores on online versus written assessments were discordant - students scored better on online tests than in written tests. This was attributed to cheating collaboration, as students residing offcampus reported to have collaborated with fellow students residing on campus in order to score higher points on WileyPLUS at the expense of failing to gain the required level of competency to perform equally well in written assessments. In conclusion, the findings in this paper alert universities to the potential challenges and implications of employing various technologies to support Blended Learning particularly in a developing country where resource limitations feature. Keywords: Blended Learning, Digital divide, #FeesMustFall, WileyPLUS, WhatsApp
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信