生物多样性新宪政主义与风险新宪政主义

M. Carducci, L. P. C. Amaya
{"title":"生物多样性新宪政主义与风险新宪政主义","authors":"M. Carducci, L. P. C. Amaya","doi":"10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N73P255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"based on an \"eco-systemic\" democracy that seeks to preserve biodiversity through the recognition of the co-evolutionary link between nature and culture, the Andean Constitutionalism emerges as the expression of a counter-hegemonic constitutionalism committed to the construction of a new institutional framework through the inclusion of new participatory and intercultural mechanisms. Departing from western constitutional paradigms, this groundbreaking constitutionalism revisits the \"Gaia hypothesis\" and legitimizes a real \"social contract\" among the people and nature, and instead of considering it as an \"object\" of ownership, exploitation, or conservation, it regards nature as a legal \"subject\" and primary source of society itself and the Constitution as its \"legal grantor and protector\".","PeriodicalId":30170,"journal":{"name":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","volume":"37 1","pages":"255-283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N73P255","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nuevo Constitucionalismo de la Biodiversidad vs. Neoconstitucionalismo del Riesgo\",\"authors\":\"M. Carducci, L. P. C. Amaya\",\"doi\":\"10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N73P255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"based on an \\\"eco-systemic\\\" democracy that seeks to preserve biodiversity through the recognition of the co-evolutionary link between nature and culture, the Andean Constitutionalism emerges as the expression of a counter-hegemonic constitutionalism committed to the construction of a new institutional framework through the inclusion of new participatory and intercultural mechanisms. Departing from western constitutional paradigms, this groundbreaking constitutionalism revisits the \\\"Gaia hypothesis\\\" and legitimizes a real \\\"social contract\\\" among the people and nature, and instead of considering it as an \\\"object\\\" of ownership, exploitation, or conservation, it regards nature as a legal \\\"subject\\\" and primary source of society itself and the Constitution as its \\\"legal grantor and protector\\\".\",\"PeriodicalId\":30170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"255-283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N73P255\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N73P255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N73P255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

基于“生态系统”民主,通过承认自然与文化之间的共同进化联系来寻求保护生物多样性,安第斯宪政作为一种反霸权宪政的表达出现,致力于通过包含新的参与性和跨文化机制来构建新的制度框架。这种开创性的立宪主义脱离了西方的立宪范式,重新审视了“盖亚假说”,将人与自然之间真正的“社会契约”合法化,不再将自然视为占有、剥削或保护的“客体”,而是将自然视为社会本身的法律“主体”和主要来源,将宪法视为社会本身的“法律授予者和保护者”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nuevo Constitucionalismo de la Biodiversidad vs. Neoconstitucionalismo del Riesgo
based on an "eco-systemic" democracy that seeks to preserve biodiversity through the recognition of the co-evolutionary link between nature and culture, the Andean Constitutionalism emerges as the expression of a counter-hegemonic constitutionalism committed to the construction of a new institutional framework through the inclusion of new participatory and intercultural mechanisms. Departing from western constitutional paradigms, this groundbreaking constitutionalism revisits the "Gaia hypothesis" and legitimizes a real "social contract" among the people and nature, and instead of considering it as an "object" of ownership, exploitation, or conservation, it regards nature as a legal "subject" and primary source of society itself and the Constitution as its "legal grantor and protector".
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信