形而上学与本体论基本哲学学科之争

F. Ugwuanyi
{"title":"形而上学与本体论基本哲学学科之争","authors":"F. Ugwuanyi","doi":"10.4236/ojpp.2022.124039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The modern readings of the history of philosophy have led some scholars to attempt to reinvent or reconstruct the subject of metaphysics. These attempts had significant consequences on the Aristotelian model of metaphysics and its status as First Philosophy as listed by the ancient commentators, Alexan-der of Aphrodisias or Theophrastus. These new trends of philosophy also al-tered the dynamics of abstraction upon which Aristotle built a convincing theory of science according to the structures of discursive reasoning. The trend did not begin until after what historians termed the “second beginning of metaphysics in the thirteenth century.” The current paper investigates the historical development and controversy surrounding the understanding of the two philosophical terms and the consequences of replacing metaphysics with ontology as the First Philosophy.","PeriodicalId":91152,"journal":{"name":"Open journal of philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Controversy over the Basic Philosophical Disciplines of Metaphysics and Ontology\",\"authors\":\"F. Ugwuanyi\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/ojpp.2022.124039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The modern readings of the history of philosophy have led some scholars to attempt to reinvent or reconstruct the subject of metaphysics. These attempts had significant consequences on the Aristotelian model of metaphysics and its status as First Philosophy as listed by the ancient commentators, Alexan-der of Aphrodisias or Theophrastus. These new trends of philosophy also al-tered the dynamics of abstraction upon which Aristotle built a convincing theory of science according to the structures of discursive reasoning. The trend did not begin until after what historians termed the “second beginning of metaphysics in the thirteenth century.” The current paper investigates the historical development and controversy surrounding the understanding of the two philosophical terms and the consequences of replacing metaphysics with ontology as the First Philosophy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open journal of philosophy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open journal of philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2022.124039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open journal of philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2022.124039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

哲学史的现代解读导致一些学者试图重塑或重建形而上学这一学科。这些尝试对亚里士多德的形而上学模式及其作为第一哲学的地位产生了重大影响,正如古代评论家,阿佛洛狄西亚的亚历山大或泰奥弗拉斯托斯所列出的那样。这些新的哲学趋势也改变了抽象的动力,亚里士多德在此基础上根据论述推理的结构建立了令人信服的科学理论。这种趋势直到历史学家称之为“13世纪形而上学的第二次开端”之后才开始。本文考察了对这两个哲学术语的理解的历史发展和争议,以及以本体论取代形而上学作为第一哲学的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Controversy over the Basic Philosophical Disciplines of Metaphysics and Ontology
The modern readings of the history of philosophy have led some scholars to attempt to reinvent or reconstruct the subject of metaphysics. These attempts had significant consequences on the Aristotelian model of metaphysics and its status as First Philosophy as listed by the ancient commentators, Alexan-der of Aphrodisias or Theophrastus. These new trends of philosophy also al-tered the dynamics of abstraction upon which Aristotle built a convincing theory of science according to the structures of discursive reasoning. The trend did not begin until after what historians termed the “second beginning of metaphysics in the thirteenth century.” The current paper investigates the historical development and controversy surrounding the understanding of the two philosophical terms and the consequences of replacing metaphysics with ontology as the First Philosophy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信