评估肯雅塔国立医院对肯尼亚国家乳腺癌诊断和分期指南的遵守情况

Q4 Medicine
S. Miima, A. Muturi, D. Ojuka, A. Ndung’u
{"title":"评估肯雅塔国立医院对肯尼亚国家乳腺癌诊断和分期指南的遵守情况","authors":"S. Miima, A. Muturi, D. Ojuka, A. Ndung’u","doi":"10.4314/EAMJ.V94I7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : In Kenya, breast cancer is one of the most prevalent diseases among women. Early diagnosis and stage-directed treatment are vital in reducing morbidity and mortality associated with it. The Kenya National Cancer Guidelines (KNCG) was developed in 2013. Utility of the guidelines is expected to improve early detection, timely diagnosis, harmonize and standardize treatment of cancer. This study sought to assess whether health care providers at Kenyatta National Hospital are utilizing the guidelines in diagnosis and staging of breast cancer. Study objective : To evaluate adherence to KNCG on diagnosis and staging of breast cancer. Study design : Retrospective descriptive study was conducted within five months. Study subjects : Two hundred and fifty (250) patients’ records with diagnosis of breast cancer between September 2013 and September 2015. Results : Most patients were female 95.6 % with mean age of 47.5±15.5 years. Duration from referral point to index breast clinic review was 10.9±11.1 days. Duration from index breast clinic review to surgery was 64.0 ±114.4 days. Documentation on findings from clinical assessment varied between 24.8 to 86.4%. Documentation on radiological assessment of the breast varied between 3.6 to 35.2% whereas for metastatic assessment varied between 3.6 to 64.0 %. Laboratory investigations documentation varied between 8.4 to 94.8% whereas pathologic diagnosis and tumour biology documentation varied between 3.6-62.4%. American joint cancer committee- tumour, node and metastasis (AJCC-TNM) staging was documented in 16 % of the records reviewed. Conclusion : From this study, triple assessment for breast cancer was incomplete and inconsistent which could result in negatively impacting management of these patients. Every effort should be put in place to track as well as prioritize patients with breast cancer in terms of investigations and surgical interventions in a timely manner. Clinical, radiologic and pathologic assessment must adhere to KNCG and be accurately documented. Clinician should undergo knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) survey on KNCG so as to identify possible gaps and institute measures aimed at compliance which ultimately could improve care of patients with breast cancer at KNH.","PeriodicalId":11399,"journal":{"name":"East African medical journal","volume":"94 1","pages":"553-560"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating compliance to Kenya national cancer guidelines on diagnosis and staging of breast cancer at Kenyatta national hospital\",\"authors\":\"S. Miima, A. Muturi, D. Ojuka, A. Ndung’u\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/EAMJ.V94I7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background : In Kenya, breast cancer is one of the most prevalent diseases among women. Early diagnosis and stage-directed treatment are vital in reducing morbidity and mortality associated with it. The Kenya National Cancer Guidelines (KNCG) was developed in 2013. Utility of the guidelines is expected to improve early detection, timely diagnosis, harmonize and standardize treatment of cancer. This study sought to assess whether health care providers at Kenyatta National Hospital are utilizing the guidelines in diagnosis and staging of breast cancer. Study objective : To evaluate adherence to KNCG on diagnosis and staging of breast cancer. Study design : Retrospective descriptive study was conducted within five months. Study subjects : Two hundred and fifty (250) patients’ records with diagnosis of breast cancer between September 2013 and September 2015. Results : Most patients were female 95.6 % with mean age of 47.5±15.5 years. Duration from referral point to index breast clinic review was 10.9±11.1 days. Duration from index breast clinic review to surgery was 64.0 ±114.4 days. Documentation on findings from clinical assessment varied between 24.8 to 86.4%. Documentation on radiological assessment of the breast varied between 3.6 to 35.2% whereas for metastatic assessment varied between 3.6 to 64.0 %. Laboratory investigations documentation varied between 8.4 to 94.8% whereas pathologic diagnosis and tumour biology documentation varied between 3.6-62.4%. American joint cancer committee- tumour, node and metastasis (AJCC-TNM) staging was documented in 16 % of the records reviewed. Conclusion : From this study, triple assessment for breast cancer was incomplete and inconsistent which could result in negatively impacting management of these patients. Every effort should be put in place to track as well as prioritize patients with breast cancer in terms of investigations and surgical interventions in a timely manner. Clinical, radiologic and pathologic assessment must adhere to KNCG and be accurately documented. Clinician should undergo knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) survey on KNCG so as to identify possible gaps and institute measures aimed at compliance which ultimately could improve care of patients with breast cancer at KNH.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East African medical journal\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"553-560\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East African medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/EAMJ.V94I7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East African medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/EAMJ.V94I7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:在肯尼亚,乳腺癌是妇女中最普遍的疾病之一。早期诊断和分阶段治疗对于降低与之相关的发病率和死亡率至关重要。肯尼亚国家癌症指南(KNCG)于2013年制定。该指南的应用有望提高癌症的早期发现、及时诊断、协调和标准化治疗。本研究旨在评估肯雅塔国家医院的卫生保健提供者是否在乳腺癌的诊断和分期中使用了该指南。研究目的:评价KNCG对乳腺癌诊断和分期的依从性。研究设计:在5个月内进行回顾性描述性研究。研究对象:250例2013年9月至2015年9月诊断为乳腺癌的患者。结果:患者以女性居多,占95.6%,平均年龄47.5±15.5岁。从转诊点到指标乳腺临床复查的时间为10.9±11.1天。从指数乳房临床复查到手术时间为64.0±114.4天。临床评估结果的文献记录在24.8%到86.4%之间。乳房放射学评估的记录在3.6%至35.2%之间,而转移性评估的记录在3.6%至64.0%之间。实验室调查文件的差异在8.4 - 94.8%之间,而病理诊断和肿瘤生物学文件的差异在3.6-62.4%之间。美国联合癌症委员会-肿瘤,淋巴结和转移(AJCC-TNM)分期在16%的记录中被记录。结论:从本研究来看,乳腺癌的三重评估是不完整和不一致的,这可能会对这些患者的管理产生负面影响。应该尽一切努力跟踪乳腺癌患者,并对其进行优先排序及时进行调查和手术干预。临床、放射学和病理学评估必须遵循KNCG并准确记录。临床医生应接受KNCG的知识、态度和实践(KAP)调查,以发现可能存在的差距,并制定措施,最终改善KNH乳腺癌患者的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating compliance to Kenya national cancer guidelines on diagnosis and staging of breast cancer at Kenyatta national hospital
Background : In Kenya, breast cancer is one of the most prevalent diseases among women. Early diagnosis and stage-directed treatment are vital in reducing morbidity and mortality associated with it. The Kenya National Cancer Guidelines (KNCG) was developed in 2013. Utility of the guidelines is expected to improve early detection, timely diagnosis, harmonize and standardize treatment of cancer. This study sought to assess whether health care providers at Kenyatta National Hospital are utilizing the guidelines in diagnosis and staging of breast cancer. Study objective : To evaluate adherence to KNCG on diagnosis and staging of breast cancer. Study design : Retrospective descriptive study was conducted within five months. Study subjects : Two hundred and fifty (250) patients’ records with diagnosis of breast cancer between September 2013 and September 2015. Results : Most patients were female 95.6 % with mean age of 47.5±15.5 years. Duration from referral point to index breast clinic review was 10.9±11.1 days. Duration from index breast clinic review to surgery was 64.0 ±114.4 days. Documentation on findings from clinical assessment varied between 24.8 to 86.4%. Documentation on radiological assessment of the breast varied between 3.6 to 35.2% whereas for metastatic assessment varied between 3.6 to 64.0 %. Laboratory investigations documentation varied between 8.4 to 94.8% whereas pathologic diagnosis and tumour biology documentation varied between 3.6-62.4%. American joint cancer committee- tumour, node and metastasis (AJCC-TNM) staging was documented in 16 % of the records reviewed. Conclusion : From this study, triple assessment for breast cancer was incomplete and inconsistent which could result in negatively impacting management of these patients. Every effort should be put in place to track as well as prioritize patients with breast cancer in terms of investigations and surgical interventions in a timely manner. Clinical, radiologic and pathologic assessment must adhere to KNCG and be accurately documented. Clinician should undergo knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) survey on KNCG so as to identify possible gaps and institute measures aimed at compliance which ultimately could improve care of patients with breast cancer at KNH.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
East African medical journal
East African medical journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The East African Medical Journal is published every month. It is intended for publication of papers on original work and reviews of all aspects of medicine. Communications bearing on clinical and basic research on problems relevant to East Africa and other African countries will receive special attention. Papers submitted for publication are accepted only on the understanding they will not be published elsewhere without the permission of the Editor-in-Chief
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信