尼日利亚一家教学医院医源性输尿管损伤——近十年的经验

Q4 Medicine
K. Tijani, K. Onwuzurigbo, R. Ojewola, B. Afolabi, N. Akanmu
{"title":"尼日利亚一家教学医院医源性输尿管损伤——近十年的经验","authors":"K. Tijani, K. Onwuzurigbo, R. Ojewola, B. Afolabi, N. Akanmu","doi":"10.4314/EAMJ.V88I9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ureteric injury is one of the most serious complications of any abdominal or pelvic surgery with significant morbidity. The medico-legal consequences are also becoming areas of concern in our environment. Traditionally abdominal hysterectomy was responsible for most cases. While recent reports from the west have however indicated a change in the pattern of these iatrogenic injuries with urological endoscopy being the major source, recent literature from the sub-Saharan Africa is relatively sparse, with the few ones available also indicating a change in pattern however of a different variety with a high incidence of injuries arising from gynaecological, non-hysterectomy causes. Objectives: To determine the incidence, pattern of presentation and outcome managements of iatrogenic ureteric injuries in our centre. Design: A retrospective descriptive study. Setting: Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria. Subjects: Twenty patients managed for iatrogenic ureteric injuries between January 2000 and June 2010. Results: A total of 20 patients were managed for 24 iatrogenic injuries. Total abdominal hysterectomy was responsible for 15 (75%) of the patients. Six patients had the injury from the referring hospital in four of whom the gynaecological operations were performed by general practitioners (GP). Twelve patients developed injury after operation in our centre. Excessive intra-operative bleeding and emergency surgery in critically ill patients referred by the GP or traditional birth attendants were the most common predisposing factors. All but one patient had open surgical intervention. All patients with delayed diagnosis were operated immediately they were fit for anaesthesia irrespective of the time of injury. Outcome was satisfactory in all patients who had surgical intervention. There was one mortality whic h occurred in one patient who presented late and died before surgical intervention. Conclusion: Total abdominal hysterectomy still accounts for most cases of iatrogenic ureteric injuries in our environment. Open surgical intervention gives satisfactory results in all cases. Early surgical intervention is necessary to prevent morbidity and mortality.","PeriodicalId":11399,"journal":{"name":"East African medical journal","volume":"88 1","pages":"304-309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Iatrogenic ureteric injuries in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital- experience in the last decade\",\"authors\":\"K. Tijani, K. Onwuzurigbo, R. Ojewola, B. Afolabi, N. Akanmu\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/EAMJ.V88I9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Ureteric injury is one of the most serious complications of any abdominal or pelvic surgery with significant morbidity. The medico-legal consequences are also becoming areas of concern in our environment. Traditionally abdominal hysterectomy was responsible for most cases. While recent reports from the west have however indicated a change in the pattern of these iatrogenic injuries with urological endoscopy being the major source, recent literature from the sub-Saharan Africa is relatively sparse, with the few ones available also indicating a change in pattern however of a different variety with a high incidence of injuries arising from gynaecological, non-hysterectomy causes. Objectives: To determine the incidence, pattern of presentation and outcome managements of iatrogenic ureteric injuries in our centre. Design: A retrospective descriptive study. Setting: Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria. Subjects: Twenty patients managed for iatrogenic ureteric injuries between January 2000 and June 2010. Results: A total of 20 patients were managed for 24 iatrogenic injuries. Total abdominal hysterectomy was responsible for 15 (75%) of the patients. Six patients had the injury from the referring hospital in four of whom the gynaecological operations were performed by general practitioners (GP). Twelve patients developed injury after operation in our centre. Excessive intra-operative bleeding and emergency surgery in critically ill patients referred by the GP or traditional birth attendants were the most common predisposing factors. All but one patient had open surgical intervention. All patients with delayed diagnosis were operated immediately they were fit for anaesthesia irrespective of the time of injury. Outcome was satisfactory in all patients who had surgical intervention. There was one mortality whic h occurred in one patient who presented late and died before surgical intervention. Conclusion: Total abdominal hysterectomy still accounts for most cases of iatrogenic ureteric injuries in our environment. Open surgical intervention gives satisfactory results in all cases. Early surgical intervention is necessary to prevent morbidity and mortality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East African medical journal\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"304-309\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East African medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/EAMJ.V88I9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East African medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/EAMJ.V88I9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:输尿管损伤是任何腹部或骨盆手术最严重的并发症之一,发病率很高。医疗法律后果也正在成为我们环境中令人关切的领域。传统上,大多数病例是腹部子宫切除术。然而,最近来自西方的报道表明,这些医源性损伤的模式发生了变化,泌尿系统内窥镜检查是主要来源,最近来自撒哈拉以南非洲的文献相对较少,少数文献也表明了模式的变化,然而,不同种类的损伤发生率高,由妇科引起,非子宫切除术原因。目的:了解我院医源性输尿管损伤的发生率、表现形式和结局处理。设计:回顾性描述性研究。地点:尼日利亚拉各斯拉各斯大学教学医院。对象:2000年1月至2010年6月收治的医源性输尿管损伤患者20例。结果:共处理医源性损伤24例,共20例。15例(75%)患者行全腹子宫切除术。6名患者在转诊医院受伤,其中4名患者的妇科手术由全科医生(GP)进行。本组12例患者术后发生损伤。由全科医生或传统接生员转诊的危重患者术中过多出血和急诊手术是最常见的诱发因素。除1例患者外,其余患者均行开放性手术干预。所有延迟诊断的患者均立即手术,无论损伤时间如何,均适合麻醉。所有接受手术干预的患者结果均令人满意。1例患者出现较晚,在手术前死亡。结论:腹式全子宫切除术仍是我国医源性输尿管损伤的主要手术方式。所有病例均获得满意的开放性手术治疗结果。早期手术干预是必要的,以防止发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Iatrogenic ureteric injuries in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital- experience in the last decade
Background: Ureteric injury is one of the most serious complications of any abdominal or pelvic surgery with significant morbidity. The medico-legal consequences are also becoming areas of concern in our environment. Traditionally abdominal hysterectomy was responsible for most cases. While recent reports from the west have however indicated a change in the pattern of these iatrogenic injuries with urological endoscopy being the major source, recent literature from the sub-Saharan Africa is relatively sparse, with the few ones available also indicating a change in pattern however of a different variety with a high incidence of injuries arising from gynaecological, non-hysterectomy causes. Objectives: To determine the incidence, pattern of presentation and outcome managements of iatrogenic ureteric injuries in our centre. Design: A retrospective descriptive study. Setting: Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria. Subjects: Twenty patients managed for iatrogenic ureteric injuries between January 2000 and June 2010. Results: A total of 20 patients were managed for 24 iatrogenic injuries. Total abdominal hysterectomy was responsible for 15 (75%) of the patients. Six patients had the injury from the referring hospital in four of whom the gynaecological operations were performed by general practitioners (GP). Twelve patients developed injury after operation in our centre. Excessive intra-operative bleeding and emergency surgery in critically ill patients referred by the GP or traditional birth attendants were the most common predisposing factors. All but one patient had open surgical intervention. All patients with delayed diagnosis were operated immediately they were fit for anaesthesia irrespective of the time of injury. Outcome was satisfactory in all patients who had surgical intervention. There was one mortality whic h occurred in one patient who presented late and died before surgical intervention. Conclusion: Total abdominal hysterectomy still accounts for most cases of iatrogenic ureteric injuries in our environment. Open surgical intervention gives satisfactory results in all cases. Early surgical intervention is necessary to prevent morbidity and mortality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
East African medical journal
East African medical journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The East African Medical Journal is published every month. It is intended for publication of papers on original work and reviews of all aspects of medicine. Communications bearing on clinical and basic research on problems relevant to East Africa and other African countries will receive special attention. Papers submitted for publication are accepted only on the understanding they will not be published elsewhere without the permission of the Editor-in-Chief
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信