儿童急性无并发症阑尾炎和脐疝:开放脐阑尾切除术是腹腔镜方法的一种选择

Tembely Samba, D. Silvia, Dieth Atafy Gaudens
{"title":"儿童急性无并发症阑尾炎和脐疝:开放脐阑尾切除术是腹腔镜方法的一种选择","authors":"Tembely Samba, D. Silvia, Dieth Atafy Gaudens","doi":"10.4172/2161-0665.1000351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Due to the lack of popularization of laparoscopy in our context, we performed umbilical appendectomies, when the diagnosis of acute appendicitis was done on patients presenting an umbilical hernia. The aim of our study was to describe this umbilical approach and to report treatment outcomes in comparison with laparoscopic appendectomy in the literature.Patients and method: This was a prospective and analytical study taking place over 18 months. The study took place in two private hospitals in Abidjan (Cote d’Ivoire). Studied parameters were: the size of the umbilical hernia collar, the localization of the appendix, the duration of the intervention, the food recovery, the hospital stay, and the postoperative complications.Results: Mean collar size was 24.2 ± 16.9 mm [extreme 5-65 mm]. The appendix was in the iliac position in (n=57; 80.2%) patients. Umbilical appendectomy (UA) was performed in all patients. All patients had an umbilical hernia cure. The mean duration of the procedure was 46 ± 9.7 minutes [range 34-72 minutes]. Food recovery occurred on day one postoperative in (n=68, 95%). Mean hospital stay was 2 ± 0.2 days [range 1-3 days].Conclusion: Umbilical appendectomy has many advantages. It could thus be an alternative to laparoscopy in our context.","PeriodicalId":91373,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics & therapeutics : current research","volume":"08 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis and Umbilical Hernia in Children: Open Umbilical Appendectomy an Alternative to the Laparoscopic Approach\",\"authors\":\"Tembely Samba, D. Silvia, Dieth Atafy Gaudens\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2161-0665.1000351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Due to the lack of popularization of laparoscopy in our context, we performed umbilical appendectomies, when the diagnosis of acute appendicitis was done on patients presenting an umbilical hernia. The aim of our study was to describe this umbilical approach and to report treatment outcomes in comparison with laparoscopic appendectomy in the literature.Patients and method: This was a prospective and analytical study taking place over 18 months. The study took place in two private hospitals in Abidjan (Cote d’Ivoire). Studied parameters were: the size of the umbilical hernia collar, the localization of the appendix, the duration of the intervention, the food recovery, the hospital stay, and the postoperative complications.Results: Mean collar size was 24.2 ± 16.9 mm [extreme 5-65 mm]. The appendix was in the iliac position in (n=57; 80.2%) patients. Umbilical appendectomy (UA) was performed in all patients. All patients had an umbilical hernia cure. The mean duration of the procedure was 46 ± 9.7 minutes [range 34-72 minutes]. Food recovery occurred on day one postoperative in (n=68, 95%). Mean hospital stay was 2 ± 0.2 days [range 1-3 days].Conclusion: Umbilical appendectomy has many advantages. It could thus be an alternative to laparoscopy in our context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatrics & therapeutics : current research\",\"volume\":\"08 1\",\"pages\":\"1-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatrics & therapeutics : current research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0665.1000351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics & therapeutics : current research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0665.1000351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:由于腹腔镜在我国的普及程度不高,当诊断为急性阑尾炎的患者出现脐疝时,我们进行了脐阑尾切除术。我们研究的目的是描述这种脐带入路,并报告文献中与腹腔镜阑尾切除术比较的治疗结果。患者和方法:这是一项为期18个月的前瞻性分析性研究。这项研究在阿比让(科特迪瓦)的两家私立医院进行。研究参数为:脐疝环的大小、阑尾的定位、干预时间、食物恢复、住院时间、术后并发症。结果:平均领径为24.2±16.9 mm[极值5 ~ 65 mm]。(n=57)阑尾位于髂位;80.2%)患者。所有患者均行脐阑尾切除术(UA)。所有患者脐疝均治愈。手术平均持续时间为46±9.7分钟[范围34-72分钟]。术后第1天出现食物恢复(n=68, 95%)。平均住院时间2±0.2天[范围1 ~ 3天]。结论:脐部阑尾切除术有许多优点。因此,在我们的情况下,它可能是腹腔镜的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis and Umbilical Hernia in Children: Open Umbilical Appendectomy an Alternative to the Laparoscopic Approach
Introduction: Due to the lack of popularization of laparoscopy in our context, we performed umbilical appendectomies, when the diagnosis of acute appendicitis was done on patients presenting an umbilical hernia. The aim of our study was to describe this umbilical approach and to report treatment outcomes in comparison with laparoscopic appendectomy in the literature.Patients and method: This was a prospective and analytical study taking place over 18 months. The study took place in two private hospitals in Abidjan (Cote d’Ivoire). Studied parameters were: the size of the umbilical hernia collar, the localization of the appendix, the duration of the intervention, the food recovery, the hospital stay, and the postoperative complications.Results: Mean collar size was 24.2 ± 16.9 mm [extreme 5-65 mm]. The appendix was in the iliac position in (n=57; 80.2%) patients. Umbilical appendectomy (UA) was performed in all patients. All patients had an umbilical hernia cure. The mean duration of the procedure was 46 ± 9.7 minutes [range 34-72 minutes]. Food recovery occurred on day one postoperative in (n=68, 95%). Mean hospital stay was 2 ± 0.2 days [range 1-3 days].Conclusion: Umbilical appendectomy has many advantages. It could thus be an alternative to laparoscopy in our context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信