{"title":"将信息系统研究与实践联系起来的挑战","authors":"J. Senn","doi":"10.4018/IRMJ.1998010103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"The academic IS community is following slowly.\" \"The work is not relevant, reachable, or readable.\" \"If they've never personally done it, how can they possibly advise someone?\" \"If I want to know what works or what's being tried, I'll pick up the phone and get a hold of my counterpart in other companies...With few exceptions, the academic IS community doesn't have a clue.\" These, and a substantial number of other highly critical comments, made by chief information officers in major corporations, were captured during the course of structured interviews conducted with information technology professionals participating in a research program currently in process 1 Senn, 1997. They are representative of many similar expressions concerning university-based information systems research. Moreover, they appear to be consistent with assessments and impressions sensed by many persons conducting information systems research from an academic home base. Judging from the apparent frequency and consistency of these judgments, it is evident that a sizeable portion of the practitioner community does not value the research conducted by information systems IS scholars. This paper explores the challenge of relating IS research to practice. It suggests alternatives for researchers to consider if they seek an impact on practice and an ongoing communication link with practitioners.","PeriodicalId":44735,"journal":{"name":"Information Resources Management Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"23-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"68","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The challenge of relating IS research to practice\",\"authors\":\"J. Senn\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/IRMJ.1998010103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"The academic IS community is following slowly.\\\" \\\"The work is not relevant, reachable, or readable.\\\" \\\"If they've never personally done it, how can they possibly advise someone?\\\" \\\"If I want to know what works or what's being tried, I'll pick up the phone and get a hold of my counterpart in other companies...With few exceptions, the academic IS community doesn't have a clue.\\\" These, and a substantial number of other highly critical comments, made by chief information officers in major corporations, were captured during the course of structured interviews conducted with information technology professionals participating in a research program currently in process 1 Senn, 1997. They are representative of many similar expressions concerning university-based information systems research. Moreover, they appear to be consistent with assessments and impressions sensed by many persons conducting information systems research from an academic home base. Judging from the apparent frequency and consistency of these judgments, it is evident that a sizeable portion of the practitioner community does not value the research conducted by information systems IS scholars. This paper explores the challenge of relating IS research to practice. It suggests alternatives for researchers to consider if they seek an impact on practice and an ongoing communication link with practitioners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Resources Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"23-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"68\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Resources Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/IRMJ.1998010103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Resources Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IRMJ.1998010103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
"The academic IS community is following slowly." "The work is not relevant, reachable, or readable." "If they've never personally done it, how can they possibly advise someone?" "If I want to know what works or what's being tried, I'll pick up the phone and get a hold of my counterpart in other companies...With few exceptions, the academic IS community doesn't have a clue." These, and a substantial number of other highly critical comments, made by chief information officers in major corporations, were captured during the course of structured interviews conducted with information technology professionals participating in a research program currently in process 1 Senn, 1997. They are representative of many similar expressions concerning university-based information systems research. Moreover, they appear to be consistent with assessments and impressions sensed by many persons conducting information systems research from an academic home base. Judging from the apparent frequency and consistency of these judgments, it is evident that a sizeable portion of the practitioner community does not value the research conducted by information systems IS scholars. This paper explores the challenge of relating IS research to practice. It suggests alternatives for researchers to consider if they seek an impact on practice and an ongoing communication link with practitioners.
期刊介绍:
Topics should be drawn from, but not limited to, the following areas, with major emphasis on the managerial and organizational aspects of information resource and technology management: •Application of IT to operation •Artificial intelligence and expert systems technologies and issues •Business process management and modeling •Data warehousing and mining •Database management technologies and issues •Decision support and group decision support systems •Distance learning technologies and issues •Distributed software development •E-collaboration •Electronic commerce technologies and issues •Electronic government •Emerging technologies management