恨是理想。诗歌与思想:跨大西洋争端的更新

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Erika Martínez
{"title":"恨是理想。诗歌与思想:跨大西洋争端的更新","authors":"Erika Martínez","doi":"10.3917/rip.292.0071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The starting point of this essay is the logical and political objection that Plato made against poetry, as well as the lack of distinction that he specified as the origin of its dangerousness, and which modernity converted into the condition of possibility of certain egalitarian forms of sensible experience and material life. I will then look at the function that the historical rearticulation of Platonic idealism has fulfilled from Romanticism to the present day in the age-old dispute between philosophy and poetry, paying particular attention to the different readings of Holderlin and Mallarme carried out by Benjamin, Lacoue-Labarthe, and Agamben as symbols of the disfiguration of poetry. I will analyze the tension between sense and sound as the founder of an irreducible territory that opens a potentiality indicative of its political force. Lastly, I will turn to Michel Foucault’s The Government of Self and Others to analyze the function of messianism and parrhesia in the contemporary characterization of political poetry and its conflicts with the truth-telling of philosophy.","PeriodicalId":44846,"journal":{"name":"REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE PHILOSOPHIE","volume":"1 1","pages":"71-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hate as Ideal. Poetry and Thought: Transatlantic Update of a Dispute\",\"authors\":\"Erika Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.3917/rip.292.0071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The starting point of this essay is the logical and political objection that Plato made against poetry, as well as the lack of distinction that he specified as the origin of its dangerousness, and which modernity converted into the condition of possibility of certain egalitarian forms of sensible experience and material life. I will then look at the function that the historical rearticulation of Platonic idealism has fulfilled from Romanticism to the present day in the age-old dispute between philosophy and poetry, paying particular attention to the different readings of Holderlin and Mallarme carried out by Benjamin, Lacoue-Labarthe, and Agamben as symbols of the disfiguration of poetry. I will analyze the tension between sense and sound as the founder of an irreducible territory that opens a potentiality indicative of its political force. Lastly, I will turn to Michel Foucault’s The Government of Self and Others to analyze the function of messianism and parrhesia in the contemporary characterization of political poetry and its conflicts with the truth-telling of philosophy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE PHILOSOPHIE\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"71-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE PHILOSOPHIE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3917/rip.292.0071\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE PHILOSOPHIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/rip.292.0071","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的出发点是柏拉图对诗歌提出的逻辑和政治上的反对,以及他所指出的诗歌危险的根源,现代性将其转化为某种平等主义形式的感性经验和物质生活的可能性条件。然后,我将看看柏拉图唯心主义的历史重新阐释在从浪漫主义到今天的哲学与诗歌之间的古老争论中所发挥的作用,特别关注本雅明、拉库-拉巴特和阿甘本对荷尔德林和马拉梅的不同解读,作为诗歌变形的象征。我将分析感官和声音之间的张力,作为一个不可缩小的领域的创始人,打开了一个潜在的指示其政治力量。最后,我将转向米歇尔·福柯的《自我与他者的政府》,分析弥赛亚主义和直言在当代政治诗歌特征刻画中的作用,以及它与哲学真理的冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hate as Ideal. Poetry and Thought: Transatlantic Update of a Dispute
The starting point of this essay is the logical and political objection that Plato made against poetry, as well as the lack of distinction that he specified as the origin of its dangerousness, and which modernity converted into the condition of possibility of certain egalitarian forms of sensible experience and material life. I will then look at the function that the historical rearticulation of Platonic idealism has fulfilled from Romanticism to the present day in the age-old dispute between philosophy and poetry, paying particular attention to the different readings of Holderlin and Mallarme carried out by Benjamin, Lacoue-Labarthe, and Agamben as symbols of the disfiguration of poetry. I will analyze the tension between sense and sound as the founder of an irreducible territory that opens a potentiality indicative of its political force. Lastly, I will turn to Michel Foucault’s The Government of Self and Others to analyze the function of messianism and parrhesia in the contemporary characterization of political poetry and its conflicts with the truth-telling of philosophy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信