{"title":"贵格会游说团及其对爱尔兰立法的影响,1692-1705","authors":"J. Bergin","doi":"10.3828/eci.2004.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"largely unexamined. The year 1692 opened a phase of Irish parliamentary history characterised by frequent sessions and an unprecedented scale of legislative activity affecting many interests. Poynings' Law dictated a convoluted procedure that brought proposed Irish legislation, not only before the two houses of the Irish parliament, but also before the privy councils of Ireland and England. The attempts to reshape Irish bills being reviewed in London by English commercial interests' and Irish Catholics and their friends2 have received some attention. The evidence for lobbying at the parliament and privy council in Dublin from the 1690s onwards remains however to be investigated.' This article is based largely on materials in the Historical Library of the Religious Society of Friends in Ireland (in Dublin and I am very grateful to the Library's Curator and her colleagues for the assistance and courtesy they have afforded me during my researches. I am currently, by permission of the Historical Committee of the Society of Friends, preparing an edition of the minute-book of the Quaker lobbying committee, for publication by the Irish Manuscripts Commission. I am indebted to Charles Ivar McGrath and James McGuire for commenting on earlier versions of this article, in turn based on a paper read before the Early Modern Ireland and","PeriodicalId":34938,"journal":{"name":"Eighteenth-Century Ireland","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Quaker Lobby and its Influence on Irish Legislation, 1692–1705\",\"authors\":\"J. Bergin\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/eci.2004.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"largely unexamined. The year 1692 opened a phase of Irish parliamentary history characterised by frequent sessions and an unprecedented scale of legislative activity affecting many interests. Poynings' Law dictated a convoluted procedure that brought proposed Irish legislation, not only before the two houses of the Irish parliament, but also before the privy councils of Ireland and England. The attempts to reshape Irish bills being reviewed in London by English commercial interests' and Irish Catholics and their friends2 have received some attention. The evidence for lobbying at the parliament and privy council in Dublin from the 1690s onwards remains however to be investigated.' This article is based largely on materials in the Historical Library of the Religious Society of Friends in Ireland (in Dublin and I am very grateful to the Library's Curator and her colleagues for the assistance and courtesy they have afforded me during my researches. I am currently, by permission of the Historical Committee of the Society of Friends, preparing an edition of the minute-book of the Quaker lobbying committee, for publication by the Irish Manuscripts Commission. I am indebted to Charles Ivar McGrath and James McGuire for commenting on earlier versions of this article, in turn based on a paper read before the Early Modern Ireland and\",\"PeriodicalId\":34938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eighteenth-Century Ireland\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eighteenth-Century Ireland\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/eci.2004.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eighteenth-Century Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/eci.2004.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
很大程度上未经检验的。1692年开启了爱尔兰议会历史的一个阶段,其特点是会议频繁,立法活动规模空前,影响了许多利益。《波因宁斯法》规定了一个复杂的程序,不仅要在爱尔兰议会两院之前,还要在爱尔兰和英格兰枢密院之前提出爱尔兰立法提案。在伦敦,英国商业利益集团和爱尔兰天主教徒及其朋友正在审查重塑爱尔兰法案的尝试,这引起了一些关注。然而,从17世纪90年代起,在都柏林议会和枢密院进行游说的证据仍有待调查。”这篇文章主要基于爱尔兰宗教之友协会历史图书馆(位于都柏林)的资料,我非常感谢图书馆馆长和她的同事们在我的研究过程中给予我的帮助和礼貌。目前,经友会历史委员会许可,我正在准备贵格会游说委员会会议纪要的一个版本,准备由爱尔兰手稿委员会出版。我要感谢Charles Ivar McGrath和James McGuire对这篇文章早期版本的评论,而这篇文章是基于早期现代爱尔兰和
The Quaker Lobby and its Influence on Irish Legislation, 1692–1705
largely unexamined. The year 1692 opened a phase of Irish parliamentary history characterised by frequent sessions and an unprecedented scale of legislative activity affecting many interests. Poynings' Law dictated a convoluted procedure that brought proposed Irish legislation, not only before the two houses of the Irish parliament, but also before the privy councils of Ireland and England. The attempts to reshape Irish bills being reviewed in London by English commercial interests' and Irish Catholics and their friends2 have received some attention. The evidence for lobbying at the parliament and privy council in Dublin from the 1690s onwards remains however to be investigated.' This article is based largely on materials in the Historical Library of the Religious Society of Friends in Ireland (in Dublin and I am very grateful to the Library's Curator and her colleagues for the assistance and courtesy they have afforded me during my researches. I am currently, by permission of the Historical Committee of the Society of Friends, preparing an edition of the minute-book of the Quaker lobbying committee, for publication by the Irish Manuscripts Commission. I am indebted to Charles Ivar McGrath and James McGuire for commenting on earlier versions of this article, in turn based on a paper read before the Early Modern Ireland and