尼日利亚哈科特港HIV-1和2抗体诊断常用快速检测试剂盒和血清学系列检测算法的评价

Matthew Osaro, Frank-Peterside, Okonko Io, E. Ughala, Obike-Martins
{"title":"尼日利亚哈科特港HIV-1和2抗体诊断常用快速检测试剂盒和血清学系列检测算法的评价","authors":"Matthew Osaro, Frank-Peterside, Okonko Io, E. Ughala, Obike-Martins","doi":"10.4172/2161-0517.1000146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three diagnostic rapid test kits (Chembio HIV-1/2 Stat-Pak, Alere DetermineTM HIV-1/2, and Core HIV-1/2) for human immunodeficiency virus types 1 and 2 (HIV-1/2) antibodies detection were evaluated against a gold standard fourth generation ELISA (Dia-Pro). Hundred and seventy two serum samples were collected from Lulubriggs Health Center, University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State. All samples were tested for HIV-1/2 using the three rapid test (parallel algorithm and serial algorithm), and retested using the 4th generation ELISA. The results obtained were compared with those from the ELISA. The DetermineTM rapid strips had sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 89.4% and total agreement of 91.3%. Stat-pak and Core HIV-1/2 rapid strips both had sensitivity of 71.7%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 90.7% and total agreement of 92.4%. Determine was mostly used by the participant laboratories 18 of 30 (60%). The performance evaluation of the testing algorithm showed that parallel algorithm is more accurate in comparison to serial algorithm. The result of this study reveals that most rapid test are less sensitive and the accuracy of serial testing algorithm is low, this implies that most acute HIV infection will be missed with rapid assay and false negative results will be reported as actual negative with serial algorithm.","PeriodicalId":91631,"journal":{"name":"Virology & mycology : infectious diseases","volume":"4 1","pages":"0-0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Commonly Used Rapid Test Kits and Serological Serial TestingAlgorithm for Diagnosis of HIV-1 and 2 Antibodies in Port Harcourt, Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Osaro, Frank-Peterside, Okonko Io, E. Ughala, Obike-Martins\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2161-0517.1000146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Three diagnostic rapid test kits (Chembio HIV-1/2 Stat-Pak, Alere DetermineTM HIV-1/2, and Core HIV-1/2) for human immunodeficiency virus types 1 and 2 (HIV-1/2) antibodies detection were evaluated against a gold standard fourth generation ELISA (Dia-Pro). Hundred and seventy two serum samples were collected from Lulubriggs Health Center, University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State. All samples were tested for HIV-1/2 using the three rapid test (parallel algorithm and serial algorithm), and retested using the 4th generation ELISA. The results obtained were compared with those from the ELISA. The DetermineTM rapid strips had sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 89.4% and total agreement of 91.3%. Stat-pak and Core HIV-1/2 rapid strips both had sensitivity of 71.7%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 90.7% and total agreement of 92.4%. Determine was mostly used by the participant laboratories 18 of 30 (60%). The performance evaluation of the testing algorithm showed that parallel algorithm is more accurate in comparison to serial algorithm. The result of this study reveals that most rapid test are less sensitive and the accuracy of serial testing algorithm is low, this implies that most acute HIV infection will be missed with rapid assay and false negative results will be reported as actual negative with serial algorithm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virology & mycology : infectious diseases\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0-0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virology & mycology : infectious diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0517.1000146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virology & mycology : infectious diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0517.1000146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

采用金标准第四代ELISA (Dia-Pro)对三种人类免疫缺陷病毒1型和2型(HIV-1/2)抗体检测快速诊断试剂盒(Chembio HIV-1/2 Stat-Pak、Alere DetermineTM HIV-1/2和Core HIV-1/2)进行了评估。从河州哈科特港大学Lulubriggs健康中心收集了172份血清样本。所有样本均采用三种快速检测方法(并行算法和串行算法)检测HIV-1/2,并采用第4代ELISA重新检测。并将所得结果与ELISA法进行比较。快速试纸的敏感性为66.7%,特异性为100%,阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为89.4%,总符合率为91.3%。Stat-pak和Core HIV-1/2快速试条的敏感性为71.7%,特异性为100%,阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为90.7%,总一致性为92.4%。30个参与实验室中有18个(60%)采用了测定法。测试算法的性能评估表明,并行算法比串行算法更精确。本研究结果表明,大多数快速检测灵敏度较低,串行检测算法的准确性较低,这意味着快速检测将错过大多数急性HIV感染,串行算法将报告假阴性结果为实际阴性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Commonly Used Rapid Test Kits and Serological Serial TestingAlgorithm for Diagnosis of HIV-1 and 2 Antibodies in Port Harcourt, Nigeria
Three diagnostic rapid test kits (Chembio HIV-1/2 Stat-Pak, Alere DetermineTM HIV-1/2, and Core HIV-1/2) for human immunodeficiency virus types 1 and 2 (HIV-1/2) antibodies detection were evaluated against a gold standard fourth generation ELISA (Dia-Pro). Hundred and seventy two serum samples were collected from Lulubriggs Health Center, University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State. All samples were tested for HIV-1/2 using the three rapid test (parallel algorithm and serial algorithm), and retested using the 4th generation ELISA. The results obtained were compared with those from the ELISA. The DetermineTM rapid strips had sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 89.4% and total agreement of 91.3%. Stat-pak and Core HIV-1/2 rapid strips both had sensitivity of 71.7%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 90.7% and total agreement of 92.4%. Determine was mostly used by the participant laboratories 18 of 30 (60%). The performance evaluation of the testing algorithm showed that parallel algorithm is more accurate in comparison to serial algorithm. The result of this study reveals that most rapid test are less sensitive and the accuracy of serial testing algorithm is low, this implies that most acute HIV infection will be missed with rapid assay and false negative results will be reported as actual negative with serial algorithm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信