{"title":"津巴布韦的国家建设和恩德贝勒特殊主义的挑战","authors":"S. Ndlovu-Gatsheni","doi":"10.4314/AJCR.V8I3.39430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deploys a politico-sociological historical analysis in the interrogation of the origins, tenacity and resilience of Ndebele particularism across pre-colonial, colonial and post-colonial epochs in Zimbabwe. While the issue of Ndebele particularism is currently overshadowed by the recent political and economic crisis that has seen Zimbabwe becoming a pariah state, it has continued to haunt both the project of nationalism that ended up unravelling along the fault-lines of Ndebele-Shona ethnicities and the post-colonial nation-building process that became marred by ethnic tensions and violence of the 1980s. In this article, Ndebele particularism is described at two main levels. Firstly, successive pre-colonial, colonial and post-colonial historical processes contributed to the construction and consolidation of Ndebele particularism. Secondly, this particularism is a product of coalescence of grievance and resentment to Shona triumphalism. The politico-sociological historical analysis is intertwined with a social constructivist perspective of understanding complex politics of identities in general. The discussion is taken up to the current reverberation of Ndebele particularistic politics on the internet including the creation of a virtual community known as United Mthwakazi Republic (UMR) that symbolises the desire for a restored pre-colonial Ndebele nation in the mould of Swaziland and Lesotho. African Journal on Conflict Resolution Vol. 8 (3) 2008: pp. 27-56","PeriodicalId":43186,"journal":{"name":"African Journal on Conflict Resolution","volume":"14 1","pages":"27-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4314/AJCR.V8I3.39430","citationCount":"57","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nation Building in Zimbabwe and the Challenges of Ndebele Particularism\",\"authors\":\"S. Ndlovu-Gatsheni\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/AJCR.V8I3.39430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article deploys a politico-sociological historical analysis in the interrogation of the origins, tenacity and resilience of Ndebele particularism across pre-colonial, colonial and post-colonial epochs in Zimbabwe. While the issue of Ndebele particularism is currently overshadowed by the recent political and economic crisis that has seen Zimbabwe becoming a pariah state, it has continued to haunt both the project of nationalism that ended up unravelling along the fault-lines of Ndebele-Shona ethnicities and the post-colonial nation-building process that became marred by ethnic tensions and violence of the 1980s. In this article, Ndebele particularism is described at two main levels. Firstly, successive pre-colonial, colonial and post-colonial historical processes contributed to the construction and consolidation of Ndebele particularism. Secondly, this particularism is a product of coalescence of grievance and resentment to Shona triumphalism. The politico-sociological historical analysis is intertwined with a social constructivist perspective of understanding complex politics of identities in general. The discussion is taken up to the current reverberation of Ndebele particularistic politics on the internet including the creation of a virtual community known as United Mthwakazi Republic (UMR) that symbolises the desire for a restored pre-colonial Ndebele nation in the mould of Swaziland and Lesotho. African Journal on Conflict Resolution Vol. 8 (3) 2008: pp. 27-56\",\"PeriodicalId\":43186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal on Conflict Resolution\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"27-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4314/AJCR.V8I3.39430\",\"citationCount\":\"57\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal on Conflict Resolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/AJCR.V8I3.39430\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal on Conflict Resolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/AJCR.V8I3.39430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 57
摘要
本文运用政治社会学历史分析的方法,对津巴布韦前殖民时期、殖民时期和后殖民时期恩德贝勒特殊主义的起源、坚韧性和恢复力进行了探究。虽然恩德贝勒特殊主义的问题目前被最近的政治和经济危机所掩盖,这使得津巴布韦成为一个贱民国家,但它继续困扰着民族主义项目,最终沿着恩德贝勒-肖纳种族的断层线瓦解,以及后殖民国家建设进程,这一进程被1980年代的种族紧张局势和暴力所破坏。在这篇文章中,恩德贝勒的特殊主义主要在两个层面上进行描述。首先,连续的前殖民、殖民和后殖民历史进程促进了恩德贝勒特殊主义的建构和巩固。其次,这种特殊主义是对修那必胜主义的不满和怨恨的产物。政治社会学历史分析与理解复杂的身份政治的社会建构主义观点交织在一起。讨论讨论了目前恩德贝勒特殊政治在互联网上的反响,包括创建一个名为联合姆斯瓦卡兹共和国(UMR)的虚拟社区,象征着恢复前殖民时期恩德贝勒国家的愿望,就像斯威士兰和莱索托一样。《非洲问题研究》,Vol. 8 (3), 2008: pp. 27-56
Nation Building in Zimbabwe and the Challenges of Ndebele Particularism
This article deploys a politico-sociological historical analysis in the interrogation of the origins, tenacity and resilience of Ndebele particularism across pre-colonial, colonial and post-colonial epochs in Zimbabwe. While the issue of Ndebele particularism is currently overshadowed by the recent political and economic crisis that has seen Zimbabwe becoming a pariah state, it has continued to haunt both the project of nationalism that ended up unravelling along the fault-lines of Ndebele-Shona ethnicities and the post-colonial nation-building process that became marred by ethnic tensions and violence of the 1980s. In this article, Ndebele particularism is described at two main levels. Firstly, successive pre-colonial, colonial and post-colonial historical processes contributed to the construction and consolidation of Ndebele particularism. Secondly, this particularism is a product of coalescence of grievance and resentment to Shona triumphalism. The politico-sociological historical analysis is intertwined with a social constructivist perspective of understanding complex politics of identities in general. The discussion is taken up to the current reverberation of Ndebele particularistic politics on the internet including the creation of a virtual community known as United Mthwakazi Republic (UMR) that symbolises the desire for a restored pre-colonial Ndebele nation in the mould of Swaziland and Lesotho. African Journal on Conflict Resolution Vol. 8 (3) 2008: pp. 27-56