地理教材学习任务研究:回顾性研究

IF 0.5 Q3 GEOGRAPHY
Petr Trahorsch, P. Knecht
{"title":"地理教材学习任务研究:回顾性研究","authors":"Petr Trahorsch, P. Knecht","doi":"10.33542/gc2021-1-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although learning tasks are among the key components of Geography textbooks, they are not adequately addressed in research in Czechia and Slovakia. The aim of this study is to describe methodological approaches to the analysis of learning tasks in Geography textbooks applied in textbooks written in English and to synthesize related research findings. A systematic review study was applied to fulfil the objectives of the study. After gradual selection of the relevant sources, 13 studies were analyzed. The results show that within the methodologies used in the studies predominante the analyses of learning tasks which are focused on the categorization of tasks in terms of their cognitive demands and in terms of their potential to develop spatial thinking. The synthesis of the results showed that most learning tasks in textbooks are characterized by low cognitive intensity or develop the lowest categories of spatial thinking. In the light of research findings, we identify the desired directions of research of learning tasks in textbooks of geography and provide recommendations for authors and publishers of textbooks.","PeriodicalId":42446,"journal":{"name":"Geographia Cassoviensis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Výzkum učebních úloh v učebnicích geografie: přehledová studie\",\"authors\":\"Petr Trahorsch, P. Knecht\",\"doi\":\"10.33542/gc2021-1-04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although learning tasks are among the key components of Geography textbooks, they are not adequately addressed in research in Czechia and Slovakia. The aim of this study is to describe methodological approaches to the analysis of learning tasks in Geography textbooks applied in textbooks written in English and to synthesize related research findings. A systematic review study was applied to fulfil the objectives of the study. After gradual selection of the relevant sources, 13 studies were analyzed. The results show that within the methodologies used in the studies predominante the analyses of learning tasks which are focused on the categorization of tasks in terms of their cognitive demands and in terms of their potential to develop spatial thinking. The synthesis of the results showed that most learning tasks in textbooks are characterized by low cognitive intensity or develop the lowest categories of spatial thinking. In the light of research findings, we identify the desired directions of research of learning tasks in textbooks of geography and provide recommendations for authors and publishers of textbooks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geographia Cassoviensis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geographia Cassoviensis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33542/gc2021-1-04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographia Cassoviensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33542/gc2021-1-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然学习任务是地理教科书的重要组成部分之一,但在捷克和斯洛伐克的研究中没有充分解决这些问题。本研究的目的是描述在英文教科书中应用地理教科书学习任务分析的方法论方法,并综合相关研究成果。为了达到研究的目的,采用了系统回顾研究。在逐步选择相关来源后,对13项研究进行分析。结果表明,在研究中使用的方法中,对学习任务的分析占主导地位,这些任务主要集中在任务的认知需求和发展空间思维的潜力方面。综合研究结果表明,教科书中大多数学习任务的认知强度较低或空间思维类别发展最低。根据研究结果,我们确定了地理教科书学习任务的研究方向,并为教科书的作者和出版商提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Výzkum učebních úloh v učebnicích geografie: přehledová studie
Although learning tasks are among the key components of Geography textbooks, they are not adequately addressed in research in Czechia and Slovakia. The aim of this study is to describe methodological approaches to the analysis of learning tasks in Geography textbooks applied in textbooks written in English and to synthesize related research findings. A systematic review study was applied to fulfil the objectives of the study. After gradual selection of the relevant sources, 13 studies were analyzed. The results show that within the methodologies used in the studies predominante the analyses of learning tasks which are focused on the categorization of tasks in terms of their cognitive demands and in terms of their potential to develop spatial thinking. The synthesis of the results showed that most learning tasks in textbooks are characterized by low cognitive intensity or develop the lowest categories of spatial thinking. In the light of research findings, we identify the desired directions of research of learning tasks in textbooks of geography and provide recommendations for authors and publishers of textbooks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Geographia Cassoviensis is a biannual peer-reviewed journal published by the Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice since 2007. It is available both in print and open-access electronic version. The journal publishes original research articles from Geography and other closely-related research fields. Since 2016 the journal is indexed in SCOPUS and ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for Humanities and Social Sciences, and since 2017 also in Emerging Sources Citation Index by Clarivate Analytics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信