{"title":"斯洛文尼亚文学语言中不可撤销的人称代词的重音和靠背形式的使用16。几个世纪","authors":"Alenka Jelovšek","doi":"10.3986/JZ.22.2.6971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the use of independent and clitic forms of non-reflexive personal pronouns in sixteenth-century standard Slovenian. It presents phrases in which the use of one or the other was fxed, and other examples highlighting the differences between individual authors and, within their works, also between individual pronouns and clitics. In addition, the situation in Old Church Slavic and in older preserved Slovenian manuscripts is comparatively described. The conclusion evaluates possible explanations for such use in the sixteenth century.","PeriodicalId":38399,"journal":{"name":"Jezikoslovni Zapiski","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Raba naglasnih in naslonskih oblik nepovratnih osebnih zaimkov v slovenskem knjižnem jeziku 16. Stoletja\",\"authors\":\"Alenka Jelovšek\",\"doi\":\"10.3986/JZ.22.2.6971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents the use of independent and clitic forms of non-reflexive personal pronouns in sixteenth-century standard Slovenian. It presents phrases in which the use of one or the other was fxed, and other examples highlighting the differences between individual authors and, within their works, also between individual pronouns and clitics. In addition, the situation in Old Church Slavic and in older preserved Slovenian manuscripts is comparatively described. The conclusion evaluates possible explanations for such use in the sixteenth century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jezikoslovni Zapiski\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jezikoslovni Zapiski\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3986/JZ.22.2.6971\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jezikoslovni Zapiski","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3986/JZ.22.2.6971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Raba naglasnih in naslonskih oblik nepovratnih osebnih zaimkov v slovenskem knjižnem jeziku 16. Stoletja
This article presents the use of independent and clitic forms of non-reflexive personal pronouns in sixteenth-century standard Slovenian. It presents phrases in which the use of one or the other was fxed, and other examples highlighting the differences between individual authors and, within their works, also between individual pronouns and clitics. In addition, the situation in Old Church Slavic and in older preserved Slovenian manuscripts is comparatively described. The conclusion evaluates possible explanations for such use in the sixteenth century.