足部矫形研究:评论

A. Rosner
{"title":"足部矫形研究:评论","authors":"A. Rosner","doi":"10.4172/2157-7595.1000255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A recent study was designed to assess the effect of orthotics upon both manual muscle testing and the duration of effects produced by the chiropractic manipulation of the spine [1]. It accomplished this by challenging the manipulation with daily activities (including walking and standing) and determining whether the use of custom foot orthotics prolongs the effects of manipulation which are presumably diminished over time by these activities. Using a means of testing several muscles bilaterally (gluteus maximus, popliteus, lower trapezius, middle deltoid, and neck extensors) in what is known as an applied kinesiology technique, it followed the natural history of indicator muscles of back pain upon their testing with or without orthotics and correlated these results with those of pain and disability, determining whether manual muscle testing results might be predictive indicators of pain and disability as well. The design of the investigation was a randomized controlled trial, in which one group received a custom fitted orthotic sole and the other a contoured sham device. The effects of manipulation were assessed by two primary outcome measures: (1) the Quadruple Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and (2) the Roland-Morris Disability Scale (RMS), and two secondary measures: (1) the determination of the number and location of vertebral fixations [FIX] as determined by palpation and challenge, (2) the determination of the number of weak muscles [WkMus] by a qualified AK clinician, the muscles having been considered relevant by the tenets of applied kinesiology (AK).","PeriodicalId":89697,"journal":{"name":"Journal of yoga & physical therapy","volume":"66 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Foot Orthotics Study: Commentary\",\"authors\":\"A. Rosner\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2157-7595.1000255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A recent study was designed to assess the effect of orthotics upon both manual muscle testing and the duration of effects produced by the chiropractic manipulation of the spine [1]. It accomplished this by challenging the manipulation with daily activities (including walking and standing) and determining whether the use of custom foot orthotics prolongs the effects of manipulation which are presumably diminished over time by these activities. Using a means of testing several muscles bilaterally (gluteus maximus, popliteus, lower trapezius, middle deltoid, and neck extensors) in what is known as an applied kinesiology technique, it followed the natural history of indicator muscles of back pain upon their testing with or without orthotics and correlated these results with those of pain and disability, determining whether manual muscle testing results might be predictive indicators of pain and disability as well. The design of the investigation was a randomized controlled trial, in which one group received a custom fitted orthotic sole and the other a contoured sham device. The effects of manipulation were assessed by two primary outcome measures: (1) the Quadruple Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and (2) the Roland-Morris Disability Scale (RMS), and two secondary measures: (1) the determination of the number and location of vertebral fixations [FIX] as determined by palpation and challenge, (2) the determination of the number of weak muscles [WkMus] by a qualified AK clinician, the muscles having been considered relevant by the tenets of applied kinesiology (AK).\",\"PeriodicalId\":89697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of yoga & physical therapy\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"1-2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of yoga & physical therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7595.1000255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of yoga & physical therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7595.1000255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的一项研究旨在评估矫形器对手动肌肉测试的影响以及脊椎推拿操作产生的影响持续时间。它通过日常活动(包括行走和站立)来挑战操作,并确定使用定制的足部矫形器是否会延长操作的效果,这些效果可能会随着时间的推移而减少。使用一种被称为应用运动学技术的方法测试双侧几块肌肉(臀大肌、腘肌、下斜方肌、中三角肌和颈伸肌),在使用或不使用矫形器的情况下,跟踪背部疼痛指标肌肉的自然历史,并将这些结果与疼痛和残疾的结果相关联,确定人工肌肉测试结果是否也可能是疼痛和残疾的预测指标。研究的设计是一项随机对照试验,其中一组接受定制的矫正鞋底,另一组接受轮廓假装置。通过两个主要结果测量来评估操作的效果:(1)四重视觉模拟量表(VAS)和(2)Roland-Morris残疾量表(RMS),以及两个次要测量:(1)通过触诊和挑战确定椎体固定物的数量和位置[FIX],(2)由合格的AK临床医生确定虚弱肌肉的数量[WkMus],这些肌肉被认为与应用运动学(AK)的原则相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Foot Orthotics Study: Commentary
A recent study was designed to assess the effect of orthotics upon both manual muscle testing and the duration of effects produced by the chiropractic manipulation of the spine [1]. It accomplished this by challenging the manipulation with daily activities (including walking and standing) and determining whether the use of custom foot orthotics prolongs the effects of manipulation which are presumably diminished over time by these activities. Using a means of testing several muscles bilaterally (gluteus maximus, popliteus, lower trapezius, middle deltoid, and neck extensors) in what is known as an applied kinesiology technique, it followed the natural history of indicator muscles of back pain upon their testing with or without orthotics and correlated these results with those of pain and disability, determining whether manual muscle testing results might be predictive indicators of pain and disability as well. The design of the investigation was a randomized controlled trial, in which one group received a custom fitted orthotic sole and the other a contoured sham device. The effects of manipulation were assessed by two primary outcome measures: (1) the Quadruple Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and (2) the Roland-Morris Disability Scale (RMS), and two secondary measures: (1) the determination of the number and location of vertebral fixations [FIX] as determined by palpation and challenge, (2) the determination of the number of weak muscles [WkMus] by a qualified AK clinician, the muscles having been considered relevant by the tenets of applied kinesiology (AK).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信