{"title":"大脑与心灵","authors":"M. Itokawa","doi":"10.4216/JPSSJ.47.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently there has been noticeable, in the writings of some philosophers (and sometimes of psychologists), efforts to proclaim the psychophysiological problem to be a vestige of the old Naturphilosophie. Such tendencies are in conflict with those branches of natural science that concentrate their efforts upon investigating the functions of the brain. Therefore one has to subject such trends to detailed critical examination.","PeriodicalId":85576,"journal":{"name":"Soviet studies in philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brain and Mind\",\"authors\":\"M. Itokawa\",\"doi\":\"10.4216/JPSSJ.47.53\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently there has been noticeable, in the writings of some philosophers (and sometimes of psychologists), efforts to proclaim the psychophysiological problem to be a vestige of the old Naturphilosophie. Such tendencies are in conflict with those branches of natural science that concentrate their efforts upon investigating the functions of the brain. Therefore one has to subject such trends to detailed critical examination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soviet studies in philosophy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soviet studies in philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4216/JPSSJ.47.53\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soviet studies in philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4216/JPSSJ.47.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Recently there has been noticeable, in the writings of some philosophers (and sometimes of psychologists), efforts to proclaim the psychophysiological problem to be a vestige of the old Naturphilosophie. Such tendencies are in conflict with those branches of natural science that concentrate their efforts upon investigating the functions of the brain. Therefore one has to subject such trends to detailed critical examination.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
