非处方漂白产品的患者满意度和并发症

Cecilia Heinisch, K. Larsson, J. Mattsson, S. Karlsson, T. Alstad, E. Bruzell
{"title":"非处方漂白产品的患者满意度和并发症","authors":"Cecilia Heinisch, K. Larsson, J. Mattsson, S. Karlsson, T. Alstad, E. Bruzell","doi":"10.4172/2332-0702.1000176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare two home-based over-the-counter (OTC) bleaching tray products with similar hydrogen peroxide (HP) concentrations with respect to tooth lightening efficacy and potential to induce negative side effects in tobacco- and non-tobacco users as well as degree of satisfaction with product handling. The HP concentrations were near the regulation limit for bleaching products of 6% set by the European Union in 2011. Materials and Methods: The clinical trial was randomized, single-blind and included 41 patients (93% completed) who were allocated into three bleaching groups: non-tobacco users treated with either 16% (corresponding to 5.8% HP) or 22% (corresponding to 7.9% HP) carbamide peroxide (CP) and tobacco users treated with 22% CP. Total bleaching time was 10.5 hours within 14 days. Tooth shade was visually assessed using a commercial shade guide. Side effects and satisfaction with the bleaching outcome and product handling were reported through a perception scale and a questionnaire. Results: Tooth lightening was similar (p>0.05) and significantly increased (p 31 years) was negatively correlated (p<0.05) and tobacco use was positively correlated (p<0.05) with bleaching efficacy. A percentage of 97% (n=38) of the patients experienced some form and degree of side effect, most frequently tooth hypersensitivity and gingival irritation. Patient satisfaction with the bleaching result was positively correlated with the user-friendliness of the product (p<0.05). Conclusion: A large number of side effects were reported after bleaching treatment with OTC products after a short treatment time. Prior to bleaching, patients should be informed of the major individual differences in both bleaching efficacy and degree and number of side effects.","PeriodicalId":90904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral hygiene & health","volume":"2015 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2332-0702.1000176","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Satisfaction and Complications of Over-the-Counter Bleaching Products\",\"authors\":\"Cecilia Heinisch, K. Larsson, J. Mattsson, S. Karlsson, T. Alstad, E. Bruzell\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2332-0702.1000176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare two home-based over-the-counter (OTC) bleaching tray products with similar hydrogen peroxide (HP) concentrations with respect to tooth lightening efficacy and potential to induce negative side effects in tobacco- and non-tobacco users as well as degree of satisfaction with product handling. The HP concentrations were near the regulation limit for bleaching products of 6% set by the European Union in 2011. Materials and Methods: The clinical trial was randomized, single-blind and included 41 patients (93% completed) who were allocated into three bleaching groups: non-tobacco users treated with either 16% (corresponding to 5.8% HP) or 22% (corresponding to 7.9% HP) carbamide peroxide (CP) and tobacco users treated with 22% CP. Total bleaching time was 10.5 hours within 14 days. Tooth shade was visually assessed using a commercial shade guide. Side effects and satisfaction with the bleaching outcome and product handling were reported through a perception scale and a questionnaire. Results: Tooth lightening was similar (p>0.05) and significantly increased (p 31 years) was negatively correlated (p<0.05) and tobacco use was positively correlated (p<0.05) with bleaching efficacy. A percentage of 97% (n=38) of the patients experienced some form and degree of side effect, most frequently tooth hypersensitivity and gingival irritation. Patient satisfaction with the bleaching result was positively correlated with the user-friendliness of the product (p<0.05). Conclusion: A large number of side effects were reported after bleaching treatment with OTC products after a short treatment time. Prior to bleaching, patients should be informed of the major individual differences in both bleaching efficacy and degree and number of side effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of oral hygiene & health\",\"volume\":\"2015 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2332-0702.1000176\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of oral hygiene & health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2332-0702.1000176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral hygiene & health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2332-0702.1000176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:比较两种过氧化氢(HP)浓度相似的家用非处方(OTC)漂白托盘产品在烟草和非烟草使用者中美白牙齿的功效、潜在的不良反应以及对产品处理的满意度。HP浓度接近欧盟2011年制定的漂白产品6%的规定限值。材料与方法:临床试验采用随机、单盲方法,纳入41例患者(93%完成),分为三组:非吸烟者用16%(对应5.8% HP)或22%(对应7.9% HP)过氧化脲(CP)治疗,吸烟者用22% CP治疗。14天内的总漂白时间为10.5小时。使用商业色度指南对牙齿色度进行视觉评估。通过感知量表和问卷调查报告漂白效果和产品处理的副作用和满意度。结果:牙美白效果与牙美白效果相似(p<0.05)、明显增加(p< 31年)呈负相关(p<0.05),吸烟与牙美白效果呈正相关(p<0.05)。97% (n=38)的患者经历了某种形式和程度的副作用,最常见的是牙齿过敏和牙龈刺激。患者对漂白效果的满意度与产品的用户友好度呈正相关(p<0.05)。结论:OTC产品在短时间内漂白后出现大量不良反应。在进行漂白前,应告知患者在漂白效果和副作用程度及次数方面的主要个体差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient Satisfaction and Complications of Over-the-Counter Bleaching Products
Objective: To compare two home-based over-the-counter (OTC) bleaching tray products with similar hydrogen peroxide (HP) concentrations with respect to tooth lightening efficacy and potential to induce negative side effects in tobacco- and non-tobacco users as well as degree of satisfaction with product handling. The HP concentrations were near the regulation limit for bleaching products of 6% set by the European Union in 2011. Materials and Methods: The clinical trial was randomized, single-blind and included 41 patients (93% completed) who were allocated into three bleaching groups: non-tobacco users treated with either 16% (corresponding to 5.8% HP) or 22% (corresponding to 7.9% HP) carbamide peroxide (CP) and tobacco users treated with 22% CP. Total bleaching time was 10.5 hours within 14 days. Tooth shade was visually assessed using a commercial shade guide. Side effects and satisfaction with the bleaching outcome and product handling were reported through a perception scale and a questionnaire. Results: Tooth lightening was similar (p>0.05) and significantly increased (p 31 years) was negatively correlated (p<0.05) and tobacco use was positively correlated (p<0.05) with bleaching efficacy. A percentage of 97% (n=38) of the patients experienced some form and degree of side effect, most frequently tooth hypersensitivity and gingival irritation. Patient satisfaction with the bleaching result was positively correlated with the user-friendliness of the product (p<0.05). Conclusion: A large number of side effects were reported after bleaching treatment with OTC products after a short treatment time. Prior to bleaching, patients should be informed of the major individual differences in both bleaching efficacy and degree and number of side effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信