骨质流失或认错人的案例

J. Borges, Lewiecki Em, L. Pavlik
{"title":"骨质流失或认错人的案例","authors":"J. Borges, Lewiecki Em, L. Pavlik","doi":"10.4172/2329-9509.1000172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The diagnosis of osteoporosis and monitoring of treatment is a challenge due to the use of different technologies for measuring bone mineral density (BMD), with many instrument manufacturers, instrument models, and software versions. Interpreters of bone density tests must be aware of these complexities when evaluating the results, with care to examine the images as well as the numerical data. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the \"goldstandard\" technology for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and monitoring the skeletal effects of treatment. However, BMD results can sometimes be misleading due to lack of technologist training leading to errors in patient positioning, incorrect analysis, or invalid data. This is a case presentation that illustrates an easily avoidable BMD testing error that could lead to inappropriate treatment decisions, highlighting the importance of quality BMD testing and reporting.","PeriodicalId":92253,"journal":{"name":"Journal of osteoporosis and physical activity","volume":"27 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2329-9509.1000172","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bone Loss or a Case of Mistaken Identity\",\"authors\":\"J. Borges, Lewiecki Em, L. Pavlik\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2329-9509.1000172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The diagnosis of osteoporosis and monitoring of treatment is a challenge due to the use of different technologies for measuring bone mineral density (BMD), with many instrument manufacturers, instrument models, and software versions. Interpreters of bone density tests must be aware of these complexities when evaluating the results, with care to examine the images as well as the numerical data. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the \\\"goldstandard\\\" technology for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and monitoring the skeletal effects of treatment. However, BMD results can sometimes be misleading due to lack of technologist training leading to errors in patient positioning, incorrect analysis, or invalid data. This is a case presentation that illustrates an easily avoidable BMD testing error that could lead to inappropriate treatment decisions, highlighting the importance of quality BMD testing and reporting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of osteoporosis and physical activity\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"1-2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2329-9509.1000172\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of osteoporosis and physical activity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-9509.1000172\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of osteoporosis and physical activity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-9509.1000172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

骨质疏松症的诊断和治疗监测是一个挑战,因为使用不同的技术来测量骨密度(BMD),有许多仪器制造商,仪器型号和软件版本。当评估结果时,骨密度测试的解释者必须意识到这些复杂性,要仔细检查图像和数值数据。双能x线吸收仪(DXA)是诊断骨质疏松症和监测治疗对骨骼影响的“金标准”技术。然而,由于缺乏技术人员培训,导致患者定位错误、分析不正确或数据无效,BMD结果有时会产生误导。这是一个很容易避免的骨密度测试错误,它可能导致不适当的治疗决策,强调了高质量骨密度测试和报告的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bone Loss or a Case of Mistaken Identity
The diagnosis of osteoporosis and monitoring of treatment is a challenge due to the use of different technologies for measuring bone mineral density (BMD), with many instrument manufacturers, instrument models, and software versions. Interpreters of bone density tests must be aware of these complexities when evaluating the results, with care to examine the images as well as the numerical data. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the "goldstandard" technology for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and monitoring the skeletal effects of treatment. However, BMD results can sometimes be misleading due to lack of technologist training leading to errors in patient positioning, incorrect analysis, or invalid data. This is a case presentation that illustrates an easily avoidable BMD testing error that could lead to inappropriate treatment decisions, highlighting the importance of quality BMD testing and reporting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信