J. PerezStachowski, Gonzalez Domenech Cm, C. GarciaVallecillos, I. PérezCamacho, D. VinuesaGarcia, M. Omar, J. Olalla, R. Palacios, A. delArco, C. HidalgoTenorio, Jesús Santos, J. L. Prada, J. Delatorre
{"title":"一线抗逆转录病毒治疗方案在hiv感染患者队列中的持久性","authors":"J. PerezStachowski, Gonzalez Domenech Cm, C. GarciaVallecillos, I. PérezCamacho, D. VinuesaGarcia, M. Omar, J. Olalla, R. Palacios, A. delArco, C. HidalgoTenorio, Jesús Santos, J. L. Prada, J. Delatorre","doi":"10.4172/2155-6113.1000773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: In recent years, increasing numbers of studies have been made of the durability of antiretroviral treatments (ART) and reasons for changing this medication, but few have evaluated the most recent therapeutic approaches. In this paper, we analyse the durability of the first-line ART regimen currently employed for patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and examine the reasons for treatment modification. Method: A retrospective multicentre observational study was conducted of patients with HIV infection who started first-line ART between January 2012 and December 2013 in the provinces of Málaga, Granada, Jaén and Almería (Spain). The main study variable is the durability of the first-line ART regimen until its modification, the reasons for which are described. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves to evaluate durability, and a Cox multiple regression model was constructed to identify associated factors. Results: A total of 664 patients started first-line ART. The average durability was 20 months (95% CI: 17-22); at one year, 29% had abandoned this regimen, while 57% maintained it until the end of follow-up. The greatest durability was achieved with regimens based on rilpivirine (RPV), darunavir (DRV) and raltegravir (RAL). The main reason for change was toxicity (20%), mainly gastrointestinal, associated with the use of protease inhibitors (PI), and neuropsychiatric, associated with the use of efavirenz (EFV). HCV coinfection, AIDS diagnosis and type of ART regimen were all associated with reduced durability. Conclusion: With the regimens currently applied, the durability of first-line ART is 20 months. At one year of treatment, this first-line regimen had been modified for 29% of patients, with toxicity being the main reason for change. Regimens based on RPV, DRV and RAL present greater durability, mainly due to their lower toxicity. Citation: Perez Stachowski J, Gonzalez-Domenech CM, García Vallecillos C, Perez-Camacho I, Vinuesa Garcia D, et al. (2018) Durability of FirstLine Antiretroviral Treatment Regimens in a Cohort of HIV-Infected Patients. J AIDS Clin Res 9: 773. doi: 10.4172/2155-6113.1000773","PeriodicalId":89166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of AIDS & clinical research","volume":"09 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Durability of First-Line Antiretroviral Treatment Regimens in a Cohort of HIV-Infected Patients\",\"authors\":\"J. PerezStachowski, Gonzalez Domenech Cm, C. GarciaVallecillos, I. PérezCamacho, D. VinuesaGarcia, M. Omar, J. Olalla, R. Palacios, A. delArco, C. HidalgoTenorio, Jesús Santos, J. L. Prada, J. Delatorre\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2155-6113.1000773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims: In recent years, increasing numbers of studies have been made of the durability of antiretroviral treatments (ART) and reasons for changing this medication, but few have evaluated the most recent therapeutic approaches. In this paper, we analyse the durability of the first-line ART regimen currently employed for patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and examine the reasons for treatment modification. Method: A retrospective multicentre observational study was conducted of patients with HIV infection who started first-line ART between January 2012 and December 2013 in the provinces of Málaga, Granada, Jaén and Almería (Spain). The main study variable is the durability of the first-line ART regimen until its modification, the reasons for which are described. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves to evaluate durability, and a Cox multiple regression model was constructed to identify associated factors. Results: A total of 664 patients started first-line ART. The average durability was 20 months (95% CI: 17-22); at one year, 29% had abandoned this regimen, while 57% maintained it until the end of follow-up. The greatest durability was achieved with regimens based on rilpivirine (RPV), darunavir (DRV) and raltegravir (RAL). The main reason for change was toxicity (20%), mainly gastrointestinal, associated with the use of protease inhibitors (PI), and neuropsychiatric, associated with the use of efavirenz (EFV). HCV coinfection, AIDS diagnosis and type of ART regimen were all associated with reduced durability. Conclusion: With the regimens currently applied, the durability of first-line ART is 20 months. At one year of treatment, this first-line regimen had been modified for 29% of patients, with toxicity being the main reason for change. Regimens based on RPV, DRV and RAL present greater durability, mainly due to their lower toxicity. Citation: Perez Stachowski J, Gonzalez-Domenech CM, García Vallecillos C, Perez-Camacho I, Vinuesa Garcia D, et al. (2018) Durability of FirstLine Antiretroviral Treatment Regimens in a Cohort of HIV-Infected Patients. J AIDS Clin Res 9: 773. doi: 10.4172/2155-6113.1000773\",\"PeriodicalId\":89166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of AIDS & clinical research\",\"volume\":\"09 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of AIDS & clinical research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6113.1000773\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of AIDS & clinical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6113.1000773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:近年来,越来越多的研究对抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的持久性和改变这种药物的原因进行了研究,但很少有研究对最新的治疗方法进行评估。在本文中,我们分析了目前用于人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染者的一线抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的持久性,并检查了治疗修改的原因。方法:对2012年1月至2013年12月在Málaga、格拉纳达、贾文森和Almería(西班牙)等省接受一线抗逆转录病毒治疗的HIV感染者进行回顾性多中心观察研究。主要的研究变量是一线抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的持久性,直到其修改,其原因被描述。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier曲线评估耐久度,构建Cox多元回归模型确定相关因素。结果:664例患者开始一线抗逆转录病毒治疗。平均持续时间为20个月(95% CI: 17-22);一年后,29%的患者放弃了该方案,57%的患者坚持到随访结束。以利匹韦林(RPV)、达那韦(DRV)和雷替格拉韦(RAL)为基础的方案获得了最大的持久性。改变的主要原因是毒性(20%),主要是胃肠道毒性,与蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)的使用有关,以及神经精神毒性,与依非韦伦(EFV)的使用有关。丙型肝炎病毒合并感染、艾滋病诊断和抗逆转录病毒治疗方案类型均与持久性降低有关。结论:按照目前的方案,一线抗逆转录病毒治疗的持续时间为20个月。治疗一年后,29%的患者改变了一线治疗方案,毒性是改变的主要原因。基于RPV, DRV和RAL的方案具有更大的持久性,主要是由于它们的毒性较低。引用本文:Perez Stachowski J, Gonzalez-Domenech CM, García Vallecillos C, Perez- camacho I, Vinuesa Garcia D,等(2018)一线抗逆转录病毒治疗方案在hiv感染者队列中的持久性。[J]艾滋病临床杂志,9:773。doi: 10.4172 / 2155 - 6113.1000773
Durability of First-Line Antiretroviral Treatment Regimens in a Cohort of HIV-Infected Patients
Aims: In recent years, increasing numbers of studies have been made of the durability of antiretroviral treatments (ART) and reasons for changing this medication, but few have evaluated the most recent therapeutic approaches. In this paper, we analyse the durability of the first-line ART regimen currently employed for patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and examine the reasons for treatment modification. Method: A retrospective multicentre observational study was conducted of patients with HIV infection who started first-line ART between January 2012 and December 2013 in the provinces of Málaga, Granada, Jaén and Almería (Spain). The main study variable is the durability of the first-line ART regimen until its modification, the reasons for which are described. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves to evaluate durability, and a Cox multiple regression model was constructed to identify associated factors. Results: A total of 664 patients started first-line ART. The average durability was 20 months (95% CI: 17-22); at one year, 29% had abandoned this regimen, while 57% maintained it until the end of follow-up. The greatest durability was achieved with regimens based on rilpivirine (RPV), darunavir (DRV) and raltegravir (RAL). The main reason for change was toxicity (20%), mainly gastrointestinal, associated with the use of protease inhibitors (PI), and neuropsychiatric, associated with the use of efavirenz (EFV). HCV coinfection, AIDS diagnosis and type of ART regimen were all associated with reduced durability. Conclusion: With the regimens currently applied, the durability of first-line ART is 20 months. At one year of treatment, this first-line regimen had been modified for 29% of patients, with toxicity being the main reason for change. Regimens based on RPV, DRV and RAL present greater durability, mainly due to their lower toxicity. Citation: Perez Stachowski J, Gonzalez-Domenech CM, García Vallecillos C, Perez-Camacho I, Vinuesa Garcia D, et al. (2018) Durability of FirstLine Antiretroviral Treatment Regimens in a Cohort of HIV-Infected Patients. J AIDS Clin Res 9: 773. doi: 10.4172/2155-6113.1000773