{"title":"动物能识别3D物体的图片吗","authors":"M. Jitsumori","doi":"10.3819/CCBR.2010.50008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A picture is something in which objects can be recognized, even though the objects themselves are not actually present when it is observed. For observers to recognize objects in a picture, visual inputs have to be matched to the representations of the visual objects in memory. Patients who suffer from visual agnosia often exhibit greater impairments in recognizing line-drawings and photographs than real objects, while leaving abilities of perceiving 2D features intact. Hiraoka, Suzuki, Hirayama, and Mori (2009) reported a patient who does not show apparent impairment with real objects and even their photographs, but has difficulties in recognizing line-drawings and silhouettes (i.e., the stimuli are missing much of 2D features of the real objects). In contrast, Turnbull, Driver, and McCarthy (2004) reported the performance of a patient on a variety of experimental tasks that investigated the patient’s ability to extract 2D and 3D information from 2D stimuli. His performance was relatively intact on the 2D tasks (e.g., picture-matching across rotations in the picture plane), but was greatly impaired on the 3D tasks (mental rotation in depth, relative depth judgments within line-drawings and shaded photographs, and the discrimination of line-drawings depicting “possible” and “impossible” 3D objects). The finding suggested that his difficulties in recognizing visually presented objects was due to the deficit in deriving 3D structure from the pictorial depth-cues within 2D images. It has also been reported that patients with agnosic deficits often show a greater impairment in the recognition of visually presented living things (e.g., animals) as compared to non-living things (e.g., tools). Wolk, Coslett, and Glosser (2005) argued that such category-specific visual agnosia suggests that information about an object’s form, as well as sensory-motor information specifying the manner of manipulation, may contribute to object recognition. Generally, visual agnosia is assumed to be derived from impairments in the processes by which visual information contacts stored knowledge of objects or representations of 3D objects in memory.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3819/CCBR.2010.50008","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do animals recognize pictures as representations of 3D objects\",\"authors\":\"M. Jitsumori\",\"doi\":\"10.3819/CCBR.2010.50008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A picture is something in which objects can be recognized, even though the objects themselves are not actually present when it is observed. For observers to recognize objects in a picture, visual inputs have to be matched to the representations of the visual objects in memory. Patients who suffer from visual agnosia often exhibit greater impairments in recognizing line-drawings and photographs than real objects, while leaving abilities of perceiving 2D features intact. Hiraoka, Suzuki, Hirayama, and Mori (2009) reported a patient who does not show apparent impairment with real objects and even their photographs, but has difficulties in recognizing line-drawings and silhouettes (i.e., the stimuli are missing much of 2D features of the real objects). In contrast, Turnbull, Driver, and McCarthy (2004) reported the performance of a patient on a variety of experimental tasks that investigated the patient’s ability to extract 2D and 3D information from 2D stimuli. His performance was relatively intact on the 2D tasks (e.g., picture-matching across rotations in the picture plane), but was greatly impaired on the 3D tasks (mental rotation in depth, relative depth judgments within line-drawings and shaded photographs, and the discrimination of line-drawings depicting “possible” and “impossible” 3D objects). The finding suggested that his difficulties in recognizing visually presented objects was due to the deficit in deriving 3D structure from the pictorial depth-cues within 2D images. It has also been reported that patients with agnosic deficits often show a greater impairment in the recognition of visually presented living things (e.g., animals) as compared to non-living things (e.g., tools). Wolk, Coslett, and Glosser (2005) argued that such category-specific visual agnosia suggests that information about an object’s form, as well as sensory-motor information specifying the manner of manipulation, may contribute to object recognition. Generally, visual agnosia is assumed to be derived from impairments in the processes by which visual information contacts stored knowledge of objects or representations of 3D objects in memory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3819/CCBR.2010.50008\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3819/CCBR.2010.50008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3819/CCBR.2010.50008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
在一幅画中,物体是可以被识别出来的,即使在观察它的时候,物体本身并不存在。为了让观察者识别图片中的物体,视觉输入必须与记忆中视觉物体的表示相匹配。患有视觉失认症的患者通常在识别线条画和照片方面表现出比真实物体更大的障碍,而感知二维特征的能力却完好无损。Hiraoka, Suzuki, Hirayama, and Mori(2009)报道了一名患者,该患者对真实物体甚至照片都没有表现出明显的损伤,但在识别线条画和轮廓方面存在困难(即,刺激缺失了真实物体的许多二维特征)。相比之下,Turnbull, Driver和McCarthy(2004)报道了患者在各种实验任务中的表现,这些实验任务调查了患者从2D刺激中提取2D和3D信息的能力。他在2D任务中的表现相对完好(例如,在画面平面的旋转中进行图片匹配),但在3D任务中(深度的心理旋转,线条图和阴影照片中的相对深度判断,以及描绘“可能”和“不可能”3D物体的线条图的区分),他的表现大大受损。这一发现表明,他在识别视觉上呈现的物体方面的困难是由于在从2D图像的图像深度线索中导出3D结构方面的缺陷。也有报道称,与非生物(如工具)相比,患有失认症的患者在识别视觉上呈现的生物(如动物)方面往往表现出更大的障碍。Wolk, Coslett和Glosser(2005)认为,这种类别特异性视觉失认症表明,关于物体形状的信息,以及指定操作方式的感觉运动信息,可能有助于物体识别。一般来说,视觉失认症被认为是由于视觉信息接触过程的障碍,存储的物体知识或三维物体的表征在记忆中。
Do animals recognize pictures as representations of 3D objects
A picture is something in which objects can be recognized, even though the objects themselves are not actually present when it is observed. For observers to recognize objects in a picture, visual inputs have to be matched to the representations of the visual objects in memory. Patients who suffer from visual agnosia often exhibit greater impairments in recognizing line-drawings and photographs than real objects, while leaving abilities of perceiving 2D features intact. Hiraoka, Suzuki, Hirayama, and Mori (2009) reported a patient who does not show apparent impairment with real objects and even their photographs, but has difficulties in recognizing line-drawings and silhouettes (i.e., the stimuli are missing much of 2D features of the real objects). In contrast, Turnbull, Driver, and McCarthy (2004) reported the performance of a patient on a variety of experimental tasks that investigated the patient’s ability to extract 2D and 3D information from 2D stimuli. His performance was relatively intact on the 2D tasks (e.g., picture-matching across rotations in the picture plane), but was greatly impaired on the 3D tasks (mental rotation in depth, relative depth judgments within line-drawings and shaded photographs, and the discrimination of line-drawings depicting “possible” and “impossible” 3D objects). The finding suggested that his difficulties in recognizing visually presented objects was due to the deficit in deriving 3D structure from the pictorial depth-cues within 2D images. It has also been reported that patients with agnosic deficits often show a greater impairment in the recognition of visually presented living things (e.g., animals) as compared to non-living things (e.g., tools). Wolk, Coslett, and Glosser (2005) argued that such category-specific visual agnosia suggests that information about an object’s form, as well as sensory-motor information specifying the manner of manipulation, may contribute to object recognition. Generally, visual agnosia is assumed to be derived from impairments in the processes by which visual information contacts stored knowledge of objects or representations of 3D objects in memory.