Stefan Platzer, M. Hajek, P. Mortimer, J. Sirohi, Juergen Rauleder
{"title":"悬停时同轴同向和反向旋翼流场的测量和仿真研究","authors":"Stefan Platzer, M. Hajek, P. Mortimer, J. Sirohi, Juergen Rauleder","doi":"10.4050/jahs.68.042008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The flow fields of a 2-m diameter two-bladed single rotor, a 2×2-bladed coaxial corotating (stacked) rotor, and a 2×2-bladed coaxial counterrotating (CCR) rotor in hover were measured using particle image velocimetry and computed using a finite-volume unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) CFD model. Phase-resolved measurements were performed on the stacked rotor at nine azimuthal locations, and time-resolved measurements were performed on the CCR rotor at 64/rev with at least 500 flow realizations per azimuth for each operating condition. The goal of this study was to compare the flow features of these rotor configurations and explore the interactions between the rotors. Overall, there was good correlation between the measurements and simulations. In particular, the effect of index angle on the upper and lower rotor thrust sharing for the stacked rotor was predicted well by the simulation. The slipstream boundary for the stacked rotor was found to vary with the index angle. The slipstream boundary and vortex trajectories for the CCR rotor were found to vary with azimuthal location, indicating the effect of blade passage on the wake geometry. Simulations indicated a stronger dependence of the tip vortex trajectory on the index angle and thrust for the stacked rotor compared to the CCR rotor. The radial thrust distribution along the upper blades was found to depend on the index angle for the stacked rotor and showed small variation due to blade passage for the CCR rotor. A larger azimuthal dependence was seen for the radial thrust distribution on the lower rotor blades, primarily due to the proximity of the upper rotor tip vortices. The lower rotor radial thrust distribution was biased towards the blade tip, outside the upper rotor slipstream.","PeriodicalId":50017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Helicopter Society","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of the Flow Fields of Coaxial Co-Rotating and Counter-Rotating Rotors in Hover Using Measurements and Simulations\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Platzer, M. Hajek, P. Mortimer, J. Sirohi, Juergen Rauleder\",\"doi\":\"10.4050/jahs.68.042008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The flow fields of a 2-m diameter two-bladed single rotor, a 2×2-bladed coaxial corotating (stacked) rotor, and a 2×2-bladed coaxial counterrotating (CCR) rotor in hover were measured using particle image velocimetry and computed using a finite-volume unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) CFD model. Phase-resolved measurements were performed on the stacked rotor at nine azimuthal locations, and time-resolved measurements were performed on the CCR rotor at 64/rev with at least 500 flow realizations per azimuth for each operating condition. The goal of this study was to compare the flow features of these rotor configurations and explore the interactions between the rotors. Overall, there was good correlation between the measurements and simulations. In particular, the effect of index angle on the upper and lower rotor thrust sharing for the stacked rotor was predicted well by the simulation. The slipstream boundary for the stacked rotor was found to vary with the index angle. The slipstream boundary and vortex trajectories for the CCR rotor were found to vary with azimuthal location, indicating the effect of blade passage on the wake geometry. Simulations indicated a stronger dependence of the tip vortex trajectory on the index angle and thrust for the stacked rotor compared to the CCR rotor. The radial thrust distribution along the upper blades was found to depend on the index angle for the stacked rotor and showed small variation due to blade passage for the CCR rotor. A larger azimuthal dependence was seen for the radial thrust distribution on the lower rotor blades, primarily due to the proximity of the upper rotor tip vortices. The lower rotor radial thrust distribution was biased towards the blade tip, outside the upper rotor slipstream.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Helicopter Society\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Helicopter Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.68.042008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Helicopter Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.68.042008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigation of the Flow Fields of Coaxial Co-Rotating and Counter-Rotating Rotors in Hover Using Measurements and Simulations
The flow fields of a 2-m diameter two-bladed single rotor, a 2×2-bladed coaxial corotating (stacked) rotor, and a 2×2-bladed coaxial counterrotating (CCR) rotor in hover were measured using particle image velocimetry and computed using a finite-volume unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) CFD model. Phase-resolved measurements were performed on the stacked rotor at nine azimuthal locations, and time-resolved measurements were performed on the CCR rotor at 64/rev with at least 500 flow realizations per azimuth for each operating condition. The goal of this study was to compare the flow features of these rotor configurations and explore the interactions between the rotors. Overall, there was good correlation between the measurements and simulations. In particular, the effect of index angle on the upper and lower rotor thrust sharing for the stacked rotor was predicted well by the simulation. The slipstream boundary for the stacked rotor was found to vary with the index angle. The slipstream boundary and vortex trajectories for the CCR rotor were found to vary with azimuthal location, indicating the effect of blade passage on the wake geometry. Simulations indicated a stronger dependence of the tip vortex trajectory on the index angle and thrust for the stacked rotor compared to the CCR rotor. The radial thrust distribution along the upper blades was found to depend on the index angle for the stacked rotor and showed small variation due to blade passage for the CCR rotor. A larger azimuthal dependence was seen for the radial thrust distribution on the lower rotor blades, primarily due to the proximity of the upper rotor tip vortices. The lower rotor radial thrust distribution was biased towards the blade tip, outside the upper rotor slipstream.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Helicopter Society is a peer-reviewed technical journal published quarterly (January, April, July and October) by AHS — The Vertical Flight Society. It is the world''s only scientific journal dedicated to vertical flight technology and is available in print and online.
The Journal publishes original technical papers dealing with theory and practice of vertical flight. The Journal seeks to foster the exchange of significant new ideas and information about helicopters and V/STOL aircraft. The scope of the Journal covers the full range of research, analysis, design, manufacturing, test, operations, and support. A constantly growing list of specialty areas is included within that scope. These range from the classical specialties like aerodynamic, dynamics and structures to more recent priorities such as acoustics, materials and signature reduction and to operational issues such as design criteria, safety and reliability. (Note: semi- and nontechnical articles of more general interest reporting current events or experiences should be sent to the VFS magazine