Elena Shrestha, Derrick W. Yeo, Vikram Hrishikeshavan, I. Chopra
{"title":"利用机载流量传感改进旋翼无人机阵风容忍度","authors":"Elena Shrestha, Derrick W. Yeo, Vikram Hrishikeshavan, I. Chopra","doi":"10.4050/jahs.68.032011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes the gust rejection study of a twin-cyclocopter micro air vehicle with two cyclorotors and an anti-torque nose rotor. A gust rejection controller relying on velocity feedback and onboard flow sensing was implemented in a closed-loop feedback system. Tethered experiments were conducted with the vehicle mounted on a 6-DOF stand in front of a synthetic gust generation device capable of providing up to 4 m/s step gust input. Planar gusts along the longitudinal and lateral axis of the cyclocopter and crosswinds were systematically studied. Both pitch control (varying nose rotor rpm) and thrust vectoring control strategies were evaluated to counteract perturbation along the longitudinal axis, while the cyclocopter used differential rotational speed of the cyclorotors for lateral gusts. Results showed that thrust vectoring was more effective than pitch control in reducing displacement from gust. Pitch control using the position feedback controller resulted in a maximum gust tolerance of 2.8 m/s with a duration of 3 s. while thrust vector control using the combined flow feedback and position feedback controller was able to withstand 4 m/s step gust input with 1 s duration with only 0.01 m displacement. In addition, flow feedback was more effective than position feedback in minimizing position error. The cyclocopter was also able to mitigate step gusts of 2.8 m/s in magnitude and 3 s duration with crosswind components at 30 deg from the longitudinal axis. The difference in performance can be attributed to the cyclocopter's unique thrust vectoring capability.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved Gust Tolerance of a Cyclocopter UAV Using Onboard Flow Sensing\",\"authors\":\"Elena Shrestha, Derrick W. Yeo, Vikram Hrishikeshavan, I. Chopra\",\"doi\":\"10.4050/jahs.68.032011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper describes the gust rejection study of a twin-cyclocopter micro air vehicle with two cyclorotors and an anti-torque nose rotor. A gust rejection controller relying on velocity feedback and onboard flow sensing was implemented in a closed-loop feedback system. Tethered experiments were conducted with the vehicle mounted on a 6-DOF stand in front of a synthetic gust generation device capable of providing up to 4 m/s step gust input. Planar gusts along the longitudinal and lateral axis of the cyclocopter and crosswinds were systematically studied. Both pitch control (varying nose rotor rpm) and thrust vectoring control strategies were evaluated to counteract perturbation along the longitudinal axis, while the cyclocopter used differential rotational speed of the cyclorotors for lateral gusts. Results showed that thrust vectoring was more effective than pitch control in reducing displacement from gust. Pitch control using the position feedback controller resulted in a maximum gust tolerance of 2.8 m/s with a duration of 3 s. while thrust vector control using the combined flow feedback and position feedback controller was able to withstand 4 m/s step gust input with 1 s duration with only 0.01 m displacement. In addition, flow feedback was more effective than position feedback in minimizing position error. The cyclocopter was also able to mitigate step gusts of 2.8 m/s in magnitude and 3 s duration with crosswind components at 30 deg from the longitudinal axis. The difference in performance can be attributed to the cyclocopter's unique thrust vectoring capability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.68.032011\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.68.032011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improved Gust Tolerance of a Cyclocopter UAV Using Onboard Flow Sensing
This paper describes the gust rejection study of a twin-cyclocopter micro air vehicle with two cyclorotors and an anti-torque nose rotor. A gust rejection controller relying on velocity feedback and onboard flow sensing was implemented in a closed-loop feedback system. Tethered experiments were conducted with the vehicle mounted on a 6-DOF stand in front of a synthetic gust generation device capable of providing up to 4 m/s step gust input. Planar gusts along the longitudinal and lateral axis of the cyclocopter and crosswinds were systematically studied. Both pitch control (varying nose rotor rpm) and thrust vectoring control strategies were evaluated to counteract perturbation along the longitudinal axis, while the cyclocopter used differential rotational speed of the cyclorotors for lateral gusts. Results showed that thrust vectoring was more effective than pitch control in reducing displacement from gust. Pitch control using the position feedback controller resulted in a maximum gust tolerance of 2.8 m/s with a duration of 3 s. while thrust vector control using the combined flow feedback and position feedback controller was able to withstand 4 m/s step gust input with 1 s duration with only 0.01 m displacement. In addition, flow feedback was more effective than position feedback in minimizing position error. The cyclocopter was also able to mitigate step gusts of 2.8 m/s in magnitude and 3 s duration with crosswind components at 30 deg from the longitudinal axis. The difference in performance can be attributed to the cyclocopter's unique thrust vectoring capability.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.