5-氟尿嘧啶个体化治疗大肠癌

L. Alnaim
{"title":"5-氟尿嘧啶个体化治疗大肠癌","authors":"L. Alnaim","doi":"10.3814/2010/352491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chemotherapeutic agents are generally characterized by a large inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability. The balance of efficacy and toxicity is critical and the imbalance can have devastating effects on patients. Standard dosing methods are inadequate in optimizing systemic exposure .Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has the potential to improve the clinical use of chemotherapy agents. TDM has been successfully applied to optimize a few anticancer treatments including carboplatin, methotrexate, and 6-mercaptopurine. 5-Flurouracil (5-FU) is considered the backbone in treatments of advanced CRC. Toxic side effects remain a significant problem despite increased safety of newer regimens. Molecular mechanisms that control DPD-activity are complex and have not been fully elucidated and cannot be used effectively to individualize Fluorouracil dosing as there is no established standard genetic test for DPD deficiency. Current phenotypic methods to measure DPD-activity are cumbersome. A reliable relationship between DPD genotype and 5-FU toxicity phenotype has not been established. Standard dosing of 5FU is by body surface area (BSA). Low correlation exists between exposure and BSA. A better predictor of total exposure is the area under the curve (AUC). Toxicity and efficacy have been correlated to AUC with target of 24-30 (mg.h/l). The therapeutic window is very narrow and difficult to attain by clinical follow-up alone. TDM has been shown effective in adjusting the dose based on AUC.","PeriodicalId":90346,"journal":{"name":"SRX pharmacology","volume":"2010 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individualization of 5-Fluorouracil in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer\",\"authors\":\"L. Alnaim\",\"doi\":\"10.3814/2010/352491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chemotherapeutic agents are generally characterized by a large inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability. The balance of efficacy and toxicity is critical and the imbalance can have devastating effects on patients. Standard dosing methods are inadequate in optimizing systemic exposure .Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has the potential to improve the clinical use of chemotherapy agents. TDM has been successfully applied to optimize a few anticancer treatments including carboplatin, methotrexate, and 6-mercaptopurine. 5-Flurouracil (5-FU) is considered the backbone in treatments of advanced CRC. Toxic side effects remain a significant problem despite increased safety of newer regimens. Molecular mechanisms that control DPD-activity are complex and have not been fully elucidated and cannot be used effectively to individualize Fluorouracil dosing as there is no established standard genetic test for DPD deficiency. Current phenotypic methods to measure DPD-activity are cumbersome. A reliable relationship between DPD genotype and 5-FU toxicity phenotype has not been established. Standard dosing of 5FU is by body surface area (BSA). Low correlation exists between exposure and BSA. A better predictor of total exposure is the area under the curve (AUC). Toxicity and efficacy have been correlated to AUC with target of 24-30 (mg.h/l). The therapeutic window is very narrow and difficult to attain by clinical follow-up alone. TDM has been shown effective in adjusting the dose based on AUC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SRX pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"2010 1\",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SRX pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3814/2010/352491\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRX pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3814/2010/352491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

化疗药物通常具有很大的个体间药代动力学变异性。疗效和毒性的平衡是至关重要的,这种不平衡可能对患者造成毁灭性的影响。标准给药方法在优化全身暴露方面是不够的。治疗性药物监测(TDM)有可能改善化疗药物的临床使用。TDM已成功应用于优化一些抗癌治疗,包括卡铂、甲氨蝶呤和6-巯基嘌呤。5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)被认为是晚期结直肠癌治疗的主要药物。尽管新疗法的安全性有所提高,但毒副作用仍然是一个重大问题。控制DPD活性的分子机制是复杂的,尚未完全阐明,不能有效地用于个体化氟尿嘧啶剂量,因为目前还没有DPD缺乏的标准基因检测。目前测量dpd活性的表型方法很繁琐。DPD基因型与5-FU毒性表型之间的可靠关系尚未建立。5FU的标准剂量按体表面积(BSA)计算。暴露与BSA的相关性不高。曲线下面积(AUC)是更好的总暴露预测指标。毒性和药效与AUC相关,靶值为24-30 (mg.h/l)。治疗窗口非常狭窄,仅靠临床随访很难获得。TDM在基于AUC的剂量调节方面已被证明是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Individualization of 5-Fluorouracil in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
Chemotherapeutic agents are generally characterized by a large inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability. The balance of efficacy and toxicity is critical and the imbalance can have devastating effects on patients. Standard dosing methods are inadequate in optimizing systemic exposure .Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has the potential to improve the clinical use of chemotherapy agents. TDM has been successfully applied to optimize a few anticancer treatments including carboplatin, methotrexate, and 6-mercaptopurine. 5-Flurouracil (5-FU) is considered the backbone in treatments of advanced CRC. Toxic side effects remain a significant problem despite increased safety of newer regimens. Molecular mechanisms that control DPD-activity are complex and have not been fully elucidated and cannot be used effectively to individualize Fluorouracil dosing as there is no established standard genetic test for DPD deficiency. Current phenotypic methods to measure DPD-activity are cumbersome. A reliable relationship between DPD genotype and 5-FU toxicity phenotype has not been established. Standard dosing of 5FU is by body surface area (BSA). Low correlation exists between exposure and BSA. A better predictor of total exposure is the area under the curve (AUC). Toxicity and efficacy have been correlated to AUC with target of 24-30 (mg.h/l). The therapeutic window is very narrow and difficult to attain by clinical follow-up alone. TDM has been shown effective in adjusting the dose based on AUC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信