药物性血小板减少症的住院医师与重点肝素诱导的血小板减少症

M. Rondina, A. Walker, R. Pendleton
{"title":"药物性血小板减少症的住院医师与重点肝素诱导的血小板减少症","authors":"M. Rondina, A. Walker, R. Pendleton","doi":"10.3810/hp.2010.04.291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Acute thrombocytopenia occurs commonly in hospitalized patients. For most, the etiology of an acutely declining platelet count is obvious and includes sepsis with disseminated intravascular coagulation, large-volume crystalloid infusion, or the administration of cytotoxic therapies, such as chemotherapeutic agents. For others, however, the etiology may be less apparent. In these cases, drug-induced thrombocytopenia (DIT), including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), must be a diagnostic consideration. The approach to the hospitalized patient with thrombocytopenia, without an obvious cause, includes a careful medication history to identify potential culprits, such as glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, vancomycin, linezolid, β-lactam antibiotics, quinine, antiepileptic drugs, or heparin/low-molecular-weight heparin. Usually, discontinuation of the offending medication is all that is necessary for resolution of thrombocytopenia. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, however, is an exception to this general rule given its unique pathogenesis and propensity for thrombotic complications and death. Differentiating between HIT and DIT due to nonheparin medications may prove challenging. Through a careful clinical assessment, consideration of the pre-test probability for HIT, and the thoughtful application of laboratory testing, HIT can be accurately diagnosed. Because patients with HIT have a high risk of thrombosis and bleeding is uncommon, the prompt initiation of an alternative anticoagulant (eg, a direct thrombin inhibitor) is warranted in these patients.","PeriodicalId":75913,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice","volume":"38 1","pages":"19 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug-Induced Thrombocytopenia for the Hospitalist Physician with a Focus on Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia\",\"authors\":\"M. Rondina, A. Walker, R. Pendleton\",\"doi\":\"10.3810/hp.2010.04.291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Acute thrombocytopenia occurs commonly in hospitalized patients. For most, the etiology of an acutely declining platelet count is obvious and includes sepsis with disseminated intravascular coagulation, large-volume crystalloid infusion, or the administration of cytotoxic therapies, such as chemotherapeutic agents. For others, however, the etiology may be less apparent. In these cases, drug-induced thrombocytopenia (DIT), including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), must be a diagnostic consideration. The approach to the hospitalized patient with thrombocytopenia, without an obvious cause, includes a careful medication history to identify potential culprits, such as glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, vancomycin, linezolid, β-lactam antibiotics, quinine, antiepileptic drugs, or heparin/low-molecular-weight heparin. Usually, discontinuation of the offending medication is all that is necessary for resolution of thrombocytopenia. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, however, is an exception to this general rule given its unique pathogenesis and propensity for thrombotic complications and death. Differentiating between HIT and DIT due to nonheparin medications may prove challenging. Through a careful clinical assessment, consideration of the pre-test probability for HIT, and the thoughtful application of laboratory testing, HIT can be accurately diagnosed. Because patients with HIT have a high risk of thrombosis and bleeding is uncommon, the prompt initiation of an alternative anticoagulant (eg, a direct thrombin inhibitor) is warranted in these patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital practice\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"19 - 28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3810/hp.2010.04.291\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3810/hp.2010.04.291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

急性血小板减少症常见于住院患者。对大多数患者来说,急性血小板计数下降的病因是明显的,包括脓毒症伴弥漫性血管内凝血、大容量晶体输注或细胞毒性治疗,如化疗药物。然而,对其他人来说,病因可能不太明显。在这些情况下,药物性血小板减少症(DIT),包括肝素性血小板减少症(HIT),必须作为诊断考虑。对于住院的无明显原因的血小板减少患者,治疗方法包括仔细的用药史,以确定潜在的罪魁祸首,如糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂、万古霉素、利奈唑胺、β-内酰胺类抗生素、奎宁、抗癫痫药物或肝素/低分子量肝素。通常,停止不良药物是解决血小板减少症所必需的。然而,肝素诱发的血小板减少症是这一一般规则的例外,因为它具有独特的发病机制和血栓并发症和死亡的倾向。由于非肝素类药物,区分HIT和DIT可能具有挑战性。通过仔细的临床评估,考虑HIT的预测概率,以及实验室检测的周到应用,可以准确诊断HIT。由于HIT患者有血栓形成的高风险,出血并不常见,因此这些患者需要立即开始使用替代抗凝剂(例如,直接凝血酶抑制剂)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drug-Induced Thrombocytopenia for the Hospitalist Physician with a Focus on Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia
Abstract Acute thrombocytopenia occurs commonly in hospitalized patients. For most, the etiology of an acutely declining platelet count is obvious and includes sepsis with disseminated intravascular coagulation, large-volume crystalloid infusion, or the administration of cytotoxic therapies, such as chemotherapeutic agents. For others, however, the etiology may be less apparent. In these cases, drug-induced thrombocytopenia (DIT), including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), must be a diagnostic consideration. The approach to the hospitalized patient with thrombocytopenia, without an obvious cause, includes a careful medication history to identify potential culprits, such as glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, vancomycin, linezolid, β-lactam antibiotics, quinine, antiepileptic drugs, or heparin/low-molecular-weight heparin. Usually, discontinuation of the offending medication is all that is necessary for resolution of thrombocytopenia. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, however, is an exception to this general rule given its unique pathogenesis and propensity for thrombotic complications and death. Differentiating between HIT and DIT due to nonheparin medications may prove challenging. Through a careful clinical assessment, consideration of the pre-test probability for HIT, and the thoughtful application of laboratory testing, HIT can be accurately diagnosed. Because patients with HIT have a high risk of thrombosis and bleeding is uncommon, the prompt initiation of an alternative anticoagulant (eg, a direct thrombin inhibitor) is warranted in these patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信