欧洲的现金限制:国内经济不稳定的原因

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
E. Beretta
{"title":"欧洲的现金限制:国内经济不稳定的原因","authors":"E. Beretta","doi":"10.3790/AEQ.61.4.373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Are cash payments, in any post-industrial economy, only a barbarous relic of the past? And should they be replaced by dematerialized payment methods? According to our analysis, cash represents a natural drive towards economic dynamism and growth. From a behavioural standpoint, resources hold in cash entail reassuring components, which have ancestral origins and cannot be eliminated by law. That notwithstanding, in several European countries a clear tendency has emerged towards imposing a limit to the use of cash, based on the supposition that it may reduce capital flight and tax fraud. Not only are these cash acceptance thresholds – mostly introduced around the crisis year 2012 – likely to have detrimental repercussions on consumption as well as GDP growth levels, but they may also cause panic waves in times of economic uncertainty. These outcomes seem particularly probable given the imperfect replaceability of cash by other payment alternatives. In addition, inadequate communication by policymakers combined with the (growing) taxation of intangible financial assets and the menace, albeit infrequent, of haircuts on bank accounts are the opposite of any coherent marketing strategy in support of cashless economies.","PeriodicalId":36978,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economics Quarterly","volume":"61 1","pages":"373-390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Europe’s Cash Restrictions: A Recipe for Home-Made Economic Instability\",\"authors\":\"E. Beretta\",\"doi\":\"10.3790/AEQ.61.4.373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Are cash payments, in any post-industrial economy, only a barbarous relic of the past? And should they be replaced by dematerialized payment methods? According to our analysis, cash represents a natural drive towards economic dynamism and growth. From a behavioural standpoint, resources hold in cash entail reassuring components, which have ancestral origins and cannot be eliminated by law. That notwithstanding, in several European countries a clear tendency has emerged towards imposing a limit to the use of cash, based on the supposition that it may reduce capital flight and tax fraud. Not only are these cash acceptance thresholds – mostly introduced around the crisis year 2012 – likely to have detrimental repercussions on consumption as well as GDP growth levels, but they may also cause panic waves in times of economic uncertainty. These outcomes seem particularly probable given the imperfect replaceability of cash by other payment alternatives. In addition, inadequate communication by policymakers combined with the (growing) taxation of intangible financial assets and the menace, albeit infrequent, of haircuts on bank accounts are the opposite of any coherent marketing strategy in support of cashless economies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Economics Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"373-390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Economics Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3790/AEQ.61.4.373\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Economics Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/AEQ.61.4.373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在任何后工业经济中,现金支付都只是过去野蛮的遗迹吗?它们是否应该被非物质化的支付方式所取代?根据我们的分析,现金代表着经济活力和增长的自然动力。从行为的角度来看,以现金形式持有的资源包含令人放心的成分,这些成分具有祖先的起源,不能被法律消除。尽管如此,在几个欧洲国家出现了一种明显的趋势,即根据现金可能减少资本外逃和税务欺诈的假设,对现金的使用施加限制。这些现金接受门槛——大多是在2012年危机前后引入的——不仅可能对消费和GDP增长水平产生不利影响,而且还可能在经济不确定时期引发恐慌。鉴于其他支付方式无法完全替代现金,上述结果似乎尤其有可能出现。此外,政策制定者的沟通不足,加上对无形金融资产(日益增加)征税,以及银行账户扣减(尽管并不常见)的威胁,与支持无现金经济的任何连贯营销策略都是背道而驰的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Europe’s Cash Restrictions: A Recipe for Home-Made Economic Instability
Are cash payments, in any post-industrial economy, only a barbarous relic of the past? And should they be replaced by dematerialized payment methods? According to our analysis, cash represents a natural drive towards economic dynamism and growth. From a behavioural standpoint, resources hold in cash entail reassuring components, which have ancestral origins and cannot be eliminated by law. That notwithstanding, in several European countries a clear tendency has emerged towards imposing a limit to the use of cash, based on the supposition that it may reduce capital flight and tax fraud. Not only are these cash acceptance thresholds – mostly introduced around the crisis year 2012 – likely to have detrimental repercussions on consumption as well as GDP growth levels, but they may also cause panic waves in times of economic uncertainty. These outcomes seem particularly probable given the imperfect replaceability of cash by other payment alternatives. In addition, inadequate communication by policymakers combined with the (growing) taxation of intangible financial assets and the menace, albeit infrequent, of haircuts on bank accounts are the opposite of any coherent marketing strategy in support of cashless economies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Economics Quarterly
Applied Economics Quarterly Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信