{"title":"分析金砖四国在欧盟14国、日本、美国和挪威的竞争力","authors":"Thannaletchimy Thanagopal","doi":"10.3790/AEQ.61.3.229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Constant Market Shares Analysis is useful in explaining the gain in export market shares of a country through two terms – structural and competitive effect. However, the model fails to define the type of competitiveness – whether a country is competitive in terms of prices (price competitiveness) or in terms of non-price factors such as quality and variety (non-price competitiveness). This article attempts to improve this analysis by estimating individual price and non-price competitive effect using an export share equation. Our article is original in representing product quality with a ‘knowledge’ variable that reflects the technological know-how of the country including knowledge spillovers from other countries and industries. Using a highly disaggregated industrial trade data over a period of 16 years (1996 to 2011), we find evidence of competitive effects in BRIC exports towards major industrialized countries namely EU-14 (excluding Luxembourg), Japan, United States and Norway. We also find that this gain in export market share is largely attributed to better price competition rather than non-price competition. The industrial results, however, indicate the presence of non-price competitiveness in selected homogeneous product sectors during this period, suggesting the beginning of a shift in BRIC export competitiveness.","PeriodicalId":36978,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economics Quarterly","volume":"61 1","pages":"229-260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing BRIC Competitiveness in the EU-14, Japan, US and Norway\",\"authors\":\"Thannaletchimy Thanagopal\",\"doi\":\"10.3790/AEQ.61.3.229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Constant Market Shares Analysis is useful in explaining the gain in export market shares of a country through two terms – structural and competitive effect. However, the model fails to define the type of competitiveness – whether a country is competitive in terms of prices (price competitiveness) or in terms of non-price factors such as quality and variety (non-price competitiveness). This article attempts to improve this analysis by estimating individual price and non-price competitive effect using an export share equation. Our article is original in representing product quality with a ‘knowledge’ variable that reflects the technological know-how of the country including knowledge spillovers from other countries and industries. Using a highly disaggregated industrial trade data over a period of 16 years (1996 to 2011), we find evidence of competitive effects in BRIC exports towards major industrialized countries namely EU-14 (excluding Luxembourg), Japan, United States and Norway. We also find that this gain in export market share is largely attributed to better price competition rather than non-price competition. The industrial results, however, indicate the presence of non-price competitiveness in selected homogeneous product sectors during this period, suggesting the beginning of a shift in BRIC export competitiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Economics Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"229-260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Economics Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3790/AEQ.61.3.229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Economics Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/AEQ.61.3.229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analyzing BRIC Competitiveness in the EU-14, Japan, US and Norway
Constant Market Shares Analysis is useful in explaining the gain in export market shares of a country through two terms – structural and competitive effect. However, the model fails to define the type of competitiveness – whether a country is competitive in terms of prices (price competitiveness) or in terms of non-price factors such as quality and variety (non-price competitiveness). This article attempts to improve this analysis by estimating individual price and non-price competitive effect using an export share equation. Our article is original in representing product quality with a ‘knowledge’ variable that reflects the technological know-how of the country including knowledge spillovers from other countries and industries. Using a highly disaggregated industrial trade data over a period of 16 years (1996 to 2011), we find evidence of competitive effects in BRIC exports towards major industrialized countries namely EU-14 (excluding Luxembourg), Japan, United States and Norway. We also find that this gain in export market share is largely attributed to better price competition rather than non-price competition. The industrial results, however, indicate the presence of non-price competitiveness in selected homogeneous product sectors during this period, suggesting the beginning of a shift in BRIC export competitiveness.