碳税下的澳大利亚农业和资源部门:CGE视角

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Xianming Meng
{"title":"碳税下的澳大利亚农业和资源部门:CGE视角","authors":"Xianming Meng","doi":"10.3790/AEQ.60.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The agricultural and resources sectors are key contributors to the Australian economy, but the carbon tax policy introduced in July 2012 has triggered substantial fear in these sectors. By employing a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model and an environmentally-extended Social Accounting Matrix (SAM), this paper simulates the effects of the Australian carbon tax on the agricultural and resources sectors. The modelling results show that a carbon tax of $23 per tonne can cut carbon emission effectively by 70.3 megatonnes or 12% of the emission base. The impact on the macro economy is mild but significant. At macro level, it will cause a 0.57% decrease in real GDP, and a 0.84% decrease in employment. At sector level, all agricultural and resources sectors will be affected negatively but to different degrees. The brown coal sector will be hit most with 25.74% decrease in output, 52.94% decrease in employment and 89.37% decrease in profitability. Conversely, the other resources sectors are only mildly affected. The impact on the agricultural sector is comparable to that on the non-energy mineral sector.","PeriodicalId":36978,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economics Quarterly","volume":"60 1","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Australian Agricultural and Resources Sectors under the Carbon Tax: A CGE Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Xianming Meng\",\"doi\":\"10.3790/AEQ.60.1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The agricultural and resources sectors are key contributors to the Australian economy, but the carbon tax policy introduced in July 2012 has triggered substantial fear in these sectors. By employing a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model and an environmentally-extended Social Accounting Matrix (SAM), this paper simulates the effects of the Australian carbon tax on the agricultural and resources sectors. The modelling results show that a carbon tax of $23 per tonne can cut carbon emission effectively by 70.3 megatonnes or 12% of the emission base. The impact on the macro economy is mild but significant. At macro level, it will cause a 0.57% decrease in real GDP, and a 0.84% decrease in employment. At sector level, all agricultural and resources sectors will be affected negatively but to different degrees. The brown coal sector will be hit most with 25.74% decrease in output, 52.94% decrease in employment and 89.37% decrease in profitability. Conversely, the other resources sectors are only mildly affected. The impact on the agricultural sector is comparable to that on the non-energy mineral sector.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Economics Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Economics Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3790/AEQ.60.1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Economics Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/AEQ.60.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农业和资源部门是澳大利亚经济的主要贡献者,但2012年7月出台的碳税政策引发了这些部门的严重担忧。通过采用可计算的一般均衡(CGE)模型和环境扩展的社会会计矩阵(SAM),本文模拟了澳大利亚碳税对农业和资源部门的影响。模型结果显示,每吨23美元的碳税可以有效减少7030万吨碳排放,即碳排放基数的12%。这对宏观经济的影响不大,但意义重大。宏观上看,实际GDP下降0.57%,就业下降0.84%。在部门一级,所有农业和资源部门都将受到不利影响,但程度不同。褐煤行业将受到最严重的打击,产量下降25.74%,就业减少52.94%,盈利能力下降89.37%。相反,其他资源部门只受到轻微影响。对农业部门的影响与对非能源矿物部门的影响相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Australian Agricultural and Resources Sectors under the Carbon Tax: A CGE Perspective
The agricultural and resources sectors are key contributors to the Australian economy, but the carbon tax policy introduced in July 2012 has triggered substantial fear in these sectors. By employing a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model and an environmentally-extended Social Accounting Matrix (SAM), this paper simulates the effects of the Australian carbon tax on the agricultural and resources sectors. The modelling results show that a carbon tax of $23 per tonne can cut carbon emission effectively by 70.3 megatonnes or 12% of the emission base. The impact on the macro economy is mild but significant. At macro level, it will cause a 0.57% decrease in real GDP, and a 0.84% decrease in employment. At sector level, all agricultural and resources sectors will be affected negatively but to different degrees. The brown coal sector will be hit most with 25.74% decrease in output, 52.94% decrease in employment and 89.37% decrease in profitability. Conversely, the other resources sectors are only mildly affected. The impact on the agricultural sector is comparable to that on the non-energy mineral sector.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Economics Quarterly
Applied Economics Quarterly Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信