急诊行头盔CPAP治疗的COVID-19患者PaCO2变化趋势评价

IF 0.4 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
N. Capsoni, D. Privitera, C. Airoldi, S. Gheda, A. Mazzone, Gianluca Terranova, Filippo Galbiati, A. Bellone
{"title":"急诊行头盔CPAP治疗的COVID-19患者PaCO2变化趋势评价","authors":"N. Capsoni, D. Privitera, C. Airoldi, S. Gheda, A. Mazzone, Gianluca Terranova, Filippo Galbiati, A. Bellone","doi":"10.4081/ecj.2023.11274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in COVID-19 hypoxemic respiratory failure (h-ARF) under a strict protocol has been described to be highly efficient. However, early prediction of failure is crucial to avoid delayed intubation. Lower PaCO2 values may represent a higher inspiratory effort and, therefore, may help identify patients at greatest risk of CPAP failure. Aim of this study was to observe the PaCO2 trend of COVID-19 patients with h-ARF before and after the initial treatment with helmet-CPAP. A case series study was conducted from November 2020 to March 2021. All adult patients with h-ARF secondary to COVID-19 treated with helmet-CPAP and eligible for endotracheal intubation were observed. Of a total of 54 patients, 32 (59.3%) underwent intubation. Seven (12.9%) patients died in the ETI group, and none in the non-ETI group. Median PaO2/FiO2 ratio on admission was 91mmHg [IQR 68-185] vs. 104mmHg [IQR 85-215] (p=0.137) in the ETI e non-ETI group, respectively. No differences were found either for PaCO2 values on admission (31.5mmHg [IQR 27-35] vs. 29.3mmHg [IQR 27.7-40]) and for PaCO2 variations after 120 minutes of CPAP (+2.38mmHg ± 3.65 vs. +2.73mmHg ± 3.96). Changes in PaCO2 values were observed during an initial helmet-CPAP trial, but no differences were found in those undergoing endotracheal intubation as compared to the others.","PeriodicalId":51984,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Care Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of PaCO2 trend in COVID-19 patients undergoing helmet CPAP in the emergency department\",\"authors\":\"N. Capsoni, D. Privitera, C. Airoldi, S. Gheda, A. Mazzone, Gianluca Terranova, Filippo Galbiati, A. Bellone\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/ecj.2023.11274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in COVID-19 hypoxemic respiratory failure (h-ARF) under a strict protocol has been described to be highly efficient. However, early prediction of failure is crucial to avoid delayed intubation. Lower PaCO2 values may represent a higher inspiratory effort and, therefore, may help identify patients at greatest risk of CPAP failure. Aim of this study was to observe the PaCO2 trend of COVID-19 patients with h-ARF before and after the initial treatment with helmet-CPAP. A case series study was conducted from November 2020 to March 2021. All adult patients with h-ARF secondary to COVID-19 treated with helmet-CPAP and eligible for endotracheal intubation were observed. Of a total of 54 patients, 32 (59.3%) underwent intubation. Seven (12.9%) patients died in the ETI group, and none in the non-ETI group. Median PaO2/FiO2 ratio on admission was 91mmHg [IQR 68-185] vs. 104mmHg [IQR 85-215] (p=0.137) in the ETI e non-ETI group, respectively. No differences were found either for PaCO2 values on admission (31.5mmHg [IQR 27-35] vs. 29.3mmHg [IQR 27.7-40]) and for PaCO2 variations after 120 minutes of CPAP (+2.38mmHg ± 3.65 vs. +2.73mmHg ± 3.96). Changes in PaCO2 values were observed during an initial helmet-CPAP trial, but no differences were found in those undergoing endotracheal intubation as compared to the others.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Care Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Care Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2023.11274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Care Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2023.11274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在严格的方案下使用持续气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗COVID-19低氧性呼吸衰竭(h-ARF)被认为是高效的。然而,早期预测失败对于避免延迟插管至关重要。较低的PaCO2值可能代表较高的吸气力,因此可以帮助识别CPAP失败风险最大的患者。本研究的目的是观察COVID-19 h-ARF患者在头盔- cpap初始治疗前后的PaCO2变化趋势。从2020年11月至2021年3月进行了一系列案例研究。观察所有接受头盔- cpap治疗并符合气管插管条件的成人COVID-19继发h-ARF患者。54例患者中,32例(59.3%)行插管。ETI组有7例(12.9%)患者死亡,非ETI组无患者死亡。入院时,ETI组和非ETI组中位PaO2/FiO2比值分别为91mmHg [IQR 68-185]和104mmHg [IQR 85-215] (p=0.137)。入院时PaCO2值(31.5mmHg [IQR 27-35]对29.3mmHg [IQR 27.7-40])和CPAP 120分钟后PaCO2变化(+2.38mmHg±3.65对+2.73mmHg±3.96)均无差异。在最初的头盔- cpap试验中观察到PaCO2值的变化,但气管插管组与其他组相比没有发现差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of PaCO2 trend in COVID-19 patients undergoing helmet CPAP in the emergency department
The use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in COVID-19 hypoxemic respiratory failure (h-ARF) under a strict protocol has been described to be highly efficient. However, early prediction of failure is crucial to avoid delayed intubation. Lower PaCO2 values may represent a higher inspiratory effort and, therefore, may help identify patients at greatest risk of CPAP failure. Aim of this study was to observe the PaCO2 trend of COVID-19 patients with h-ARF before and after the initial treatment with helmet-CPAP. A case series study was conducted from November 2020 to March 2021. All adult patients with h-ARF secondary to COVID-19 treated with helmet-CPAP and eligible for endotracheal intubation were observed. Of a total of 54 patients, 32 (59.3%) underwent intubation. Seven (12.9%) patients died in the ETI group, and none in the non-ETI group. Median PaO2/FiO2 ratio on admission was 91mmHg [IQR 68-185] vs. 104mmHg [IQR 85-215] (p=0.137) in the ETI e non-ETI group, respectively. No differences were found either for PaCO2 values on admission (31.5mmHg [IQR 27-35] vs. 29.3mmHg [IQR 27.7-40]) and for PaCO2 variations after 120 minutes of CPAP (+2.38mmHg ± 3.65 vs. +2.73mmHg ± 3.96). Changes in PaCO2 values were observed during an initial helmet-CPAP trial, but no differences were found in those undergoing endotracheal intubation as compared to the others.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Care Journal
Emergency Care Journal EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
60.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信