基于肌电图和主观方法的室内消防最大水压的人机工程学评价

Sandra Groos, K. Kluth
{"title":"基于肌电图和主观方法的室内消防最大水压的人机工程学评价","authors":"Sandra Groos, K. Kluth","doi":"10.3233/OER-150218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: So far, there exists no internationally uniform regulation about the pressure limits of water used for putting out fires in multi-story buildings and large properties. OBJECTIVE: In this ergonomic study, the optimum and maximum pressure for the fire water supply was tested with respect to physically feasible and safe indoor fire-fighting. METHODS: In order to prove whether the nozzles work most efficient and a fire can be extinguished safely and precisely, 12 professional fire-fighters carried out simulated fire-fighting procedures under nearly realistic conditions. Throughout the entire test, the electromyographic activity (EA) from 7 muscles of the right hand-arm-shoulder system and one muscle of the left arm was recorded. Additionally, a special questionnaire had to be filled in to evaluate the subjective experiences when handling the nozzles. RESULTS: The EA – standardized through MVCs (Maximum Voluntary Contractions) – exceeded the limit for short-term static work for 3 muscles, especially when the pressure was 0.8 MPa and higher. The subjective ratings confirmed the measured physiological responses. CONCLUSIONS: The operating pressure for the fire water supply should not exceed 0.6 MPa (as compromise 0.7 MPa), in order to ensure safe and precise fire-fighting, and that the nozzles work most efficient.","PeriodicalId":91780,"journal":{"name":"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety","volume":"12 1","pages":"19-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/OER-150218","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ergonomic evaluation of the maximum water pressure for indoor fire-fighting via electromyographic and subjective methods\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Groos, K. Kluth\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/OER-150218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: So far, there exists no internationally uniform regulation about the pressure limits of water used for putting out fires in multi-story buildings and large properties. OBJECTIVE: In this ergonomic study, the optimum and maximum pressure for the fire water supply was tested with respect to physically feasible and safe indoor fire-fighting. METHODS: In order to prove whether the nozzles work most efficient and a fire can be extinguished safely and precisely, 12 professional fire-fighters carried out simulated fire-fighting procedures under nearly realistic conditions. Throughout the entire test, the electromyographic activity (EA) from 7 muscles of the right hand-arm-shoulder system and one muscle of the left arm was recorded. Additionally, a special questionnaire had to be filled in to evaluate the subjective experiences when handling the nozzles. RESULTS: The EA – standardized through MVCs (Maximum Voluntary Contractions) – exceeded the limit for short-term static work for 3 muscles, especially when the pressure was 0.8 MPa and higher. The subjective ratings confirmed the measured physiological responses. CONCLUSIONS: The operating pressure for the fire water supply should not exceed 0.6 MPa (as compromise 0.7 MPa), in order to ensure safe and precise fire-fighting, and that the nozzles work most efficient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"19-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/OER-150218\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/OER-150218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/OER-150218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:到目前为止,国际上还没有关于多层建筑和大型物业灭火用水压力限制的统一规定。目的:在本人体工程学研究中,从物理可行和安全的室内消防角度,测试消防给水的最佳和最大压力。方法:12名专业消防队员在近乎真实的条件下进行了模拟灭火,以验证喷头是否能最有效地工作,是否能安全准确地扑灭火灾。在整个测试过程中,记录了右臂-肩系统7块肌肉和左臂1块肌肉的肌电活动(EA)。此外,还必须填写一份特殊的问卷来评估处理喷嘴时的主观体验。结果:通过MVCs(最大自愿收缩)标准化的EA超过了3块肌肉短期静态工作的极限,特别是当压力为0.8 MPa及更高时。主观评分证实了测量到的生理反应。结论:消防给水操作压力不应超过0.6 MPa(以0.7 MPa为宜),以保证安全、精确灭火,使消防喷头工作效率最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ergonomic evaluation of the maximum water pressure for indoor fire-fighting via electromyographic and subjective methods
BACKGROUND: So far, there exists no internationally uniform regulation about the pressure limits of water used for putting out fires in multi-story buildings and large properties. OBJECTIVE: In this ergonomic study, the optimum and maximum pressure for the fire water supply was tested with respect to physically feasible and safe indoor fire-fighting. METHODS: In order to prove whether the nozzles work most efficient and a fire can be extinguished safely and precisely, 12 professional fire-fighters carried out simulated fire-fighting procedures under nearly realistic conditions. Throughout the entire test, the electromyographic activity (EA) from 7 muscles of the right hand-arm-shoulder system and one muscle of the left arm was recorded. Additionally, a special questionnaire had to be filled in to evaluate the subjective experiences when handling the nozzles. RESULTS: The EA – standardized through MVCs (Maximum Voluntary Contractions) – exceeded the limit for short-term static work for 3 muscles, especially when the pressure was 0.8 MPa and higher. The subjective ratings confirmed the measured physiological responses. CONCLUSIONS: The operating pressure for the fire water supply should not exceed 0.6 MPa (as compromise 0.7 MPa), in order to ensure safe and precise fire-fighting, and that the nozzles work most efficient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信