食欲素A和B对两种固定反应及镇痛作用的影响

Q4 Immunology and Microbiology
Abraham Miranda-Páez, Priscila Vázquez-León, L. Martínez-Mota, Vicente Sandoval-Herrera, Ivan Villanueva-Becerril, S. Zamudio
{"title":"食欲素A和B对两种固定反应及镇痛作用的影响","authors":"Abraham Miranda-Páez, Priscila Vázquez-León, L. Martínez-Mota, Vicente Sandoval-Herrera, Ivan Villanueva-Becerril, S. Zamudio","doi":"10.3233/NIB-140092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The orexins are important for the regulation of several behavioral patterns, including feeding, arousal state, drug seeking, voluntary locomotion and nociception. Two orexins (A and B), and two different orexin receptors are known, which have differential distribution. This suggests that orexins and distinct orexin receptors may regulate specific behaviors such as immobility associated analgesia. The periaqueductal gray (PAG) is considered to be the main center for the analgesia and immobility responses in the central nervous system (CNS). Here we compared the effect of orexin A (OX-A) and orexin B (OX-B) after intracerebroventricular (ICV) or the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vl-PAG) injection. Two forms of immobility responses were studied: cataleptic (CAT) and tonic (TI) responses. The latter was associated with analgesia as part of a defensive response in several species. We observed that OX-A was more effective than OX-B to reduce CAT; OX-B was slightly more potent than OX-A to decrease TI and neither orexins were able to induce analgesia when orexins were injected ICV. After microinjection into vl-PAG CAT was unaffected by orexins and both orexins significantly decrease TI. Microinjected OX-A did not show analgesic activity but OX-B produced significant analgesic effect assessed by tail-flick test.","PeriodicalId":38645,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Neuroimmune Biology","volume":"5 1","pages":"235-242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/NIB-140092","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Orexin A and B on Two Forms of Immobility Responses and on Analgesia\",\"authors\":\"Abraham Miranda-Páez, Priscila Vázquez-León, L. Martínez-Mota, Vicente Sandoval-Herrera, Ivan Villanueva-Becerril, S. Zamudio\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/NIB-140092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The orexins are important for the regulation of several behavioral patterns, including feeding, arousal state, drug seeking, voluntary locomotion and nociception. Two orexins (A and B), and two different orexin receptors are known, which have differential distribution. This suggests that orexins and distinct orexin receptors may regulate specific behaviors such as immobility associated analgesia. The periaqueductal gray (PAG) is considered to be the main center for the analgesia and immobility responses in the central nervous system (CNS). Here we compared the effect of orexin A (OX-A) and orexin B (OX-B) after intracerebroventricular (ICV) or the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vl-PAG) injection. Two forms of immobility responses were studied: cataleptic (CAT) and tonic (TI) responses. The latter was associated with analgesia as part of a defensive response in several species. We observed that OX-A was more effective than OX-B to reduce CAT; OX-B was slightly more potent than OX-A to decrease TI and neither orexins were able to induce analgesia when orexins were injected ICV. After microinjection into vl-PAG CAT was unaffected by orexins and both orexins significantly decrease TI. Microinjected OX-A did not show analgesic activity but OX-B produced significant analgesic effect assessed by tail-flick test.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Neuroimmune Biology\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"235-242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/NIB-140092\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Neuroimmune Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/NIB-140092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Immunology and Microbiology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Neuroimmune Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/NIB-140092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Immunology and Microbiology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

食欲素对几种行为模式的调节很重要,包括进食、觉醒状态、药物寻求、自主运动和伤害感受。已知两种食欲素(A和B)和两种不同的食欲素受体,它们具有不同的分布。这表明食欲素和不同的食欲素受体可能调节特定的行为,如静止相关的镇痛。导水管周围灰质(PAG)被认为是中枢神经系统(CNS)镇痛和静止反应的主要中枢。本研究比较了脑室内(ICV)和腹外侧导尿管周围灰质(vl-PAG)注射后食欲素A (OX-A)和食欲素B (OX-B)的作用。研究了两种形式的静止反应:cataleptic (CAT)和tonic (TI)反应。后者与镇痛有关,是一些物种防御反应的一部分。我们观察到OX-A比OX-B更有效地降低CAT;OX-B对TI的抑制作用略强于OX-A,两种促食欲素均不能诱导体外注射促食欲素时的镇痛作用。微量注射到vl-PAG后,食欲素对CAT无影响,两种食欲素均显著降低TI。微注射OX-A无镇痛活性,但摇尾试验评价OX-B有明显的镇痛作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effects of Orexin A and B on Two Forms of Immobility Responses and on Analgesia
The orexins are important for the regulation of several behavioral patterns, including feeding, arousal state, drug seeking, voluntary locomotion and nociception. Two orexins (A and B), and two different orexin receptors are known, which have differential distribution. This suggests that orexins and distinct orexin receptors may regulate specific behaviors such as immobility associated analgesia. The periaqueductal gray (PAG) is considered to be the main center for the analgesia and immobility responses in the central nervous system (CNS). Here we compared the effect of orexin A (OX-A) and orexin B (OX-B) after intracerebroventricular (ICV) or the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vl-PAG) injection. Two forms of immobility responses were studied: cataleptic (CAT) and tonic (TI) responses. The latter was associated with analgesia as part of a defensive response in several species. We observed that OX-A was more effective than OX-B to reduce CAT; OX-B was slightly more potent than OX-A to decrease TI and neither orexins were able to induce analgesia when orexins were injected ICV. After microinjection into vl-PAG CAT was unaffected by orexins and both orexins significantly decrease TI. Microinjected OX-A did not show analgesic activity but OX-B produced significant analgesic effect assessed by tail-flick test.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Neuroimmune Biology
Advances in Neuroimmune Biology Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信