陈述与真实性丧失异议

M. Ghins
{"title":"陈述与真实性丧失异议","authors":"M. Ghins","doi":"10.3280/EPIS2012-001004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I will focus on the following central question: how can an abstract entity – a model – possibly represent an existing observable entity, which is phenomenally accessible to us, but which is not abstract? This is what Bas van Fraassen calls “the loss of reality objection.” (van Fraassen B. C. 2008: 258) Instead of proposing a pragmatic dissolution of this objection as van Fraassen does, I will argue that our contact with phenomenal entities is grounded on propositions, dubbed “ontic”, that are true in a correspondence sense. Before we address this issue, a brief presentation of what I believe to be the main features of scientific representing is in order.","PeriodicalId":50506,"journal":{"name":"Epistemologia","volume":"1 1","pages":"47-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Representation and the Loss of Reality Objection\",\"authors\":\"M. Ghins\",\"doi\":\"10.3280/EPIS2012-001004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I will focus on the following central question: how can an abstract entity – a model – possibly represent an existing observable entity, which is phenomenally accessible to us, but which is not abstract? This is what Bas van Fraassen calls “the loss of reality objection.” (van Fraassen B. C. 2008: 258) Instead of proposing a pragmatic dissolution of this objection as van Fraassen does, I will argue that our contact with phenomenal entities is grounded on propositions, dubbed “ontic”, that are true in a correspondence sense. Before we address this issue, a brief presentation of what I believe to be the main features of scientific representing is in order.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epistemologia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"47-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epistemologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3280/EPIS2012-001004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epistemologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/EPIS2012-001004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我将关注以下中心问题:一个抽象实体——一个模型——如何可能代表一个现有的可观察实体,这是我们可以明显地访问,但它不是抽象的?这就是Bas van Fraassen所说的“现实缺失反对”。(van Fraassen b.c. 2008: 258)我不会像van Fraassen那样提出一种实用主义的反驳,而是认为我们与现象实体的接触是建立在命题的基础上的,这些命题被称为“本体”,在对应的意义上是真实的。在我们讨论这个问题之前,有必要简要介绍一下我认为科学表征的主要特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Representation and the Loss of Reality Objection
In this paper, I will focus on the following central question: how can an abstract entity – a model – possibly represent an existing observable entity, which is phenomenally accessible to us, but which is not abstract? This is what Bas van Fraassen calls “the loss of reality objection.” (van Fraassen B. C. 2008: 258) Instead of proposing a pragmatic dissolution of this objection as van Fraassen does, I will argue that our contact with phenomenal entities is grounded on propositions, dubbed “ontic”, that are true in a correspondence sense. Before we address this issue, a brief presentation of what I believe to be the main features of scientific representing is in order.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epistemologia
Epistemologia 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信