德国股市的风险因素:情绪能改善传统多因素模型的表现吗?

Q3 Decision Sciences
Emile David Hövel, Matthias Gehrke
{"title":"德国股市的风险因素:情绪能改善传统多因素模型的表现吗?","authors":"Emile David Hövel, Matthias Gehrke","doi":"10.35944/jofrp.2022.11.1.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Capital market research usually focuses on the investment decision of a risk-averse investor, who determines the relationship between risky assets and risk-free investment. Furthermore, numerous capital market models assume normally distributed security returns and rational investors. In this framework, ex-ante investment decisions depend solely on the expected return, risk of investment opportunities, and investor risk affinity. For decades, empirical research findings have criticized this idealized framework. New risk factors were empirically confirmed and established. This study attempts to shed light on this issue. A comparative analysis considers the Fama-French and Carhart factors and a principal component analysis based sentiment-risk factor considering 76 sentiment indicators to examine the possible explanatory contribution to German stock market returns.","PeriodicalId":37351,"journal":{"name":"ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors in the German Stock Market: Can Sentiment Improve the Performance of Traditional Multifactor Models?\",\"authors\":\"Emile David Hövel, Matthias Gehrke\",\"doi\":\"10.35944/jofrp.2022.11.1.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Capital market research usually focuses on the investment decision of a risk-averse investor, who determines the relationship between risky assets and risk-free investment. Furthermore, numerous capital market models assume normally distributed security returns and rational investors. In this framework, ex-ante investment decisions depend solely on the expected return, risk of investment opportunities, and investor risk affinity. For decades, empirical research findings have criticized this idealized framework. New risk factors were empirically confirmed and established. This study attempts to shed light on this issue. A comparative analysis considers the Fama-French and Carhart factors and a principal component analysis based sentiment-risk factor considering 76 sentiment indicators to examine the possible explanatory contribution to German stock market returns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35944/jofrp.2022.11.1.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Decision Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35944/jofrp.2022.11.1.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

资本市场研究通常关注风险厌恶型投资者的投资决策,他们决定了风险资产和无风险投资之间的关系。此外,许多资本市场模型假设证券收益正态分布,投资者理性。在此框架中,事前投资决策仅取决于预期收益、投资机会风险和投资者风险亲和力。几十年来,实证研究结果对这种理想化的框架提出了批评。新的危险因素被经验证实和确立。这项研究试图阐明这个问题。比较分析考虑了Fama-French和Carhart因素和基于主成分分析的情绪风险因素,考虑了76个情绪指标,以检查可能对德国股市回报的解释贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk Factors in the German Stock Market: Can Sentiment Improve the Performance of Traditional Multifactor Models?
Capital market research usually focuses on the investment decision of a risk-averse investor, who determines the relationship between risky assets and risk-free investment. Furthermore, numerous capital market models assume normally distributed security returns and rational investors. In this framework, ex-ante investment decisions depend solely on the expected return, risk of investment opportunities, and investor risk affinity. For decades, empirical research findings have criticized this idealized framework. New risk factors were empirically confirmed and established. This study attempts to shed light on this issue. A comparative analysis considers the Fama-French and Carhart factors and a principal component analysis based sentiment-risk factor considering 76 sentiment indicators to examine the possible explanatory contribution to German stock market returns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives
ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal is special because it aims to provide an outlet for inter-disciplinary and more in-depth research papers with various methodological approaches from the broad fields of Finance, Risk and Accounting. The target group of this journal are academics who want to get a better understanding of the interconnectedness of their fields by acknowledging the methods and theories used in closely related areas. The JOFRP thus aims to overcome the self-imposed paradigmatic boundaries and reflexive isomorphisms of the individual, typically rather narrow fields and invites new and combined perspectives from the fields of Finance, Risk and Accounting. Despite its methodological, topical and disciplinary openness - it does so with a strong focus on academic rigour and robustness. Articles can vary in size and approaches but all articles will be strictly double-blind peer reviewed and authors are frequently invited to discuss the ramifications of their articles in the global FRAP and SSFII conferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信