韩国发展援助的部门决定因素:相似还是不同?

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Hanmee Na Kim, Jinhwan Oh
{"title":"韩国发展援助的部门决定因素:相似还是不同?","authors":"Hanmee Na Kim, Jinhwan Oh","doi":"10.35866/CAUJED.2021.46.1.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Are South Korean official development assistance (ODA) disbursement determinants different by sectors? The majority of existing studies have focused on either aggregate total ODA flows or regional distribution, although motivations for ODA allocation could differ by sector. Using a panel data set of 127 recipient countries over 16 years, this study investigates the determinants of Korea’s ODA allocation, especially grants, across five main sectors - specifically, education, health, public administration, technology, and agriculture. We find that the sectoral ODA allocation is generally determined by various factors and their impacts vary across sectors. It should be noted, however, that ‘the total ODA volume’ and ‘the status of Korea’s priority country’ show consistently positive coefficients regardless of sectors. Moreover, it was found that this effect continues to have a powerful impact even after Korea became an OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) member. The finding implies that political and strategic factors play a key role in determining the sectoral ODA allocation of Korea. For sectoral ODA disbursement to be further concentrated toward a smaller number of recipient countries, this study suggests that the number of priority countries should be reduced than the status of quo.","PeriodicalId":15602,"journal":{"name":"Journal of economic development","volume":"46 1","pages":"85-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sectoral Determinants of Korean Development Assistance: Similar, yet Different?\",\"authors\":\"Hanmee Na Kim, Jinhwan Oh\",\"doi\":\"10.35866/CAUJED.2021.46.1.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Are South Korean official development assistance (ODA) disbursement determinants different by sectors? The majority of existing studies have focused on either aggregate total ODA flows or regional distribution, although motivations for ODA allocation could differ by sector. Using a panel data set of 127 recipient countries over 16 years, this study investigates the determinants of Korea’s ODA allocation, especially grants, across five main sectors - specifically, education, health, public administration, technology, and agriculture. We find that the sectoral ODA allocation is generally determined by various factors and their impacts vary across sectors. It should be noted, however, that ‘the total ODA volume’ and ‘the status of Korea’s priority country’ show consistently positive coefficients regardless of sectors. Moreover, it was found that this effect continues to have a powerful impact even after Korea became an OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) member. The finding implies that political and strategic factors play a key role in determining the sectoral ODA allocation of Korea. For sectoral ODA disbursement to be further concentrated toward a smaller number of recipient countries, this study suggests that the number of priority countries should be reduced than the status of quo.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of economic development\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"85-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of economic development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35866/CAUJED.2021.46.1.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of economic development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35866/CAUJED.2021.46.1.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

韩国官方发展援助(ODA)支出决定因素是否因部门而异?虽然官方发展援助分配的动机可能因部门而异,但现有的大多数研究都集中于官方发展援助总流量或区域分配。本研究利用16年来127个受援国的面板数据集,调查了韩国在五个主要部门(具体而言,教育、卫生、公共行政、技术和农业)分配官方发展援助(特别是赠款)的决定因素。我们发现,部门官方发展援助分配通常由各种因素决定,其影响因部门而异。然而,应该指出的是,“官方发展援助总额”和“韩国优先国家的地位”无论在哪个部门都显示出一贯的正系数。而且,即使韩国成为经合组织(OECD)发展援助委员会(DAC)的成员国,这种效果仍在继续。这一调查结果表明,政治和战略因素在决定对朝鲜的部门性官方发展援助分配方面起着关键作用。为了使部门性官方发展援助的支付进一步集中于少数受援国,这项研究建议优先国家的数目应比现状减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sectoral Determinants of Korean Development Assistance: Similar, yet Different?
Are South Korean official development assistance (ODA) disbursement determinants different by sectors? The majority of existing studies have focused on either aggregate total ODA flows or regional distribution, although motivations for ODA allocation could differ by sector. Using a panel data set of 127 recipient countries over 16 years, this study investigates the determinants of Korea’s ODA allocation, especially grants, across five main sectors - specifically, education, health, public administration, technology, and agriculture. We find that the sectoral ODA allocation is generally determined by various factors and their impacts vary across sectors. It should be noted, however, that ‘the total ODA volume’ and ‘the status of Korea’s priority country’ show consistently positive coefficients regardless of sectors. Moreover, it was found that this effect continues to have a powerful impact even after Korea became an OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) member. The finding implies that political and strategic factors play a key role in determining the sectoral ODA allocation of Korea. For sectoral ODA disbursement to be further concentrated toward a smaller number of recipient countries, this study suggests that the number of priority countries should be reduced than the status of quo.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of economic development
Journal of economic development Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Development (JED) promotes and encourages research that aim at economic development and growth by publishing papers of great scholarly merit on a wide range of topics and employing a wide range of approaches. JED welcomes both theoretical and empirical papers in the fields of economic development, economic growth, international trade and finance, labor economics, IO, social choice and political economics. JED also invites the economic analysis on the experiences of economic development in various dimensions from all the countries of the globe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信