贺南洪。， Sat。他的父亲是一名律师，母亲是一名律师。阿恩。II 567-588和或。嗯，嗯。III 5:作者作为编辑的角色

IF 0.1 4区历史学 0 CLASSICS

Emerita Pub Date : 2015-12-30 DOI:10.3989/EMERITA.2015.14.1407

C. Puente

{"title":"贺南洪。， Sat。他的父亲是一名律师，母亲是一名律师。阿恩。II 567-588和或。嗯，嗯。III 5:作者作为编辑的角色","authors":"C. Puente","doi":"10.3989/EMERITA.2015.14.1407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three Latin texts were, according to many scholars, not written by their alleged authors, namely Hor., Sat. I 10.1-8, Verg., Aen. II 567-588 and Ou., Am. III 5. They are, however, still published as authentic, unless in exceptional cases. This paper pays attention to the reasons why they have been treated as falsely ascribed. It also delves into certain some aspects, previously not well taken into account, that may help to confirm, with a variable degree of certainty, the authenticity of these texts, in particular, the role of the author as publisher of his works.","PeriodicalId":11579,"journal":{"name":"Emerita","volume":"83 1","pages":"309-331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hor., Sat . I 10.1-8, Verg., Aen . II 567-588 y Ou., Am . III 5: el papel del autor como editor\",\"authors\":\"C. Puente\",\"doi\":\"10.3989/EMERITA.2015.14.1407\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Three Latin texts were, according to many scholars, not written by their alleged authors, namely Hor., Sat. I 10.1-8, Verg., Aen. II 567-588 and Ou., Am. III 5. They are, however, still published as authentic, unless in exceptional cases. This paper pays attention to the reasons why they have been treated as falsely ascribed. It also delves into certain some aspects, previously not well taken into account, that may help to confirm, with a variable degree of certainty, the authenticity of these texts, in particular, the role of the author as publisher of his works.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emerita\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"309-331\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emerita\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3989/EMERITA.2015.14.1407\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/EMERITA.2015.14.1407","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

根据许多学者的说法，有三篇拉丁文本并非出自所谓的作者之手，即《何》。，周六1月10日-8日，Verg。,为。II 567-588和Ou。,我。三世5。然而，除非在特殊情况下，它们仍然作为真实的出版。本文对其被误归的原因进行了探讨。它还深入研究了某些方面，以前没有很好地考虑到，这可能有助于确认，以不同程度的确定性，这些文本的真实性，特别是作者作为其作品的出版商的角色。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Hor., Sat . I 10.1-8, Verg., Aen . II 567-588 y Ou., Am . III 5: el papel del autor como editor

Three Latin texts were, according to many scholars, not written by their alleged authors, namely Hor., Sat. I 10.1-8, Verg., Aen. II 567-588 and Ou., Am. III 5. They are, however, still published as authentic, unless in exceptional cases. This paper pays attention to the reasons why they have been treated as falsely ascribed. It also delves into certain some aspects, previously not well taken into account, that may help to confirm, with a variable degree of certainty, the authenticity of these texts, in particular, the role of the author as publisher of his works.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Emerita CLASSICS-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

48 weeks

期刊介绍： Founded in 1933 by D. Ramón Menéndez Pidal, EMERITA publishes two issues per year, about 400 pages of articles and reviews concerning Classical Philology, Greek, Latin, Indoeuropean and Iberian Linguistics and Ancient History. EMERITA is, since its foundation, one of the best known and valued high level scientific Journals in its field.