rTMS和CIMT对慢性脑卒中患者神经功能恢复的影响

N. Kuthiala, A. Bhasin, Rahul Sharma, M. Srivastava, S. S. Kumran, Sakshi Sharma, Kumar
{"title":"rTMS和CIMT对慢性脑卒中患者神经功能恢复的影响","authors":"N. Kuthiala, A. Bhasin, Rahul Sharma, M. Srivastava, S. S. Kumran, Sakshi Sharma, Kumar","doi":"10.37421/2376-0281.2020.7.378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of high frequency rTMS with constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT) on Upper extremity motor function. Clinical Stroke Assessment Scales and fMRI was used to assess the response of CIMT with rTMS on blood oxygenation-level dependent (BOLD) sequence component. Methodology: RCT was conducted at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, on chronic stroke patients (N=60) between 12 to 36 months of index event with atleast 10° of wrist extension, 10° of thumb abduction, Brunnstorm stage 2-4; NIHSS 4–20. Patients were randomized to CIMT alone (Group A n=30) & rTMS with CIMT (Group B n=30). rTMS (10 Hz, 750 pulses with 110%RMT) was administered for 3 weeks (5days/week). Radiological Assessment of the patients was done with fMRI (BOLD) along with assessment of Fugl Meyer (FM), Barthel Index, and modified Rankin Scales (MRS) at baseline, 3 weeks (Post intervention) & 3 month (follow up) Results: FM showed statistically significant improvement in group B as compared to group A at 3 weeks (95%CI: -12.4 to -9.3, p=0.003) and 3months (95%CI: 7.4 to 4.2, p=0.01). Repeated measure ANOVA showed that the mean groups were different at all-time points indicating some degree of improvement in all the subjects (F=3.4, p=0.01; F=5.4, p=0.002). The BOLD cluster activation was compared between two groups; there was increase in the number of clusters found in Group B. Conclusion: Both the groups showed improvement, increased cluster count showing alterations in cortical activations (fMRI-BOLD) after CIMT with rTMS in patients with chronic stroke indicated more degree of clinical improvement in upper extremity function.","PeriodicalId":91292,"journal":{"name":"International journal of neurorehabilitation","volume":"7 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"rTMS and CIMT for Neurofunctional Recovery in Chronic Stroke\",\"authors\":\"N. Kuthiala, A. Bhasin, Rahul Sharma, M. Srivastava, S. S. Kumran, Sakshi Sharma, Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.37421/2376-0281.2020.7.378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of high frequency rTMS with constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT) on Upper extremity motor function. Clinical Stroke Assessment Scales and fMRI was used to assess the response of CIMT with rTMS on blood oxygenation-level dependent (BOLD) sequence component. Methodology: RCT was conducted at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, on chronic stroke patients (N=60) between 12 to 36 months of index event with atleast 10° of wrist extension, 10° of thumb abduction, Brunnstorm stage 2-4; NIHSS 4–20. Patients were randomized to CIMT alone (Group A n=30) & rTMS with CIMT (Group B n=30). rTMS (10 Hz, 750 pulses with 110%RMT) was administered for 3 weeks (5days/week). Radiological Assessment of the patients was done with fMRI (BOLD) along with assessment of Fugl Meyer (FM), Barthel Index, and modified Rankin Scales (MRS) at baseline, 3 weeks (Post intervention) & 3 month (follow up) Results: FM showed statistically significant improvement in group B as compared to group A at 3 weeks (95%CI: -12.4 to -9.3, p=0.003) and 3months (95%CI: 7.4 to 4.2, p=0.01). Repeated measure ANOVA showed that the mean groups were different at all-time points indicating some degree of improvement in all the subjects (F=3.4, p=0.01; F=5.4, p=0.002). The BOLD cluster activation was compared between two groups; there was increase in the number of clusters found in Group B. Conclusion: Both the groups showed improvement, increased cluster count showing alterations in cortical activations (fMRI-BOLD) after CIMT with rTMS in patients with chronic stroke indicated more degree of clinical improvement in upper extremity function.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of neurorehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of neurorehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37421/2376-0281.2020.7.378\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of neurorehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37421/2376-0281.2020.7.378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:本研究旨在探讨高频rTMS联合约束诱导运动疗法(CIMT)对上肢运动功能的影响。采用临床卒中评估量表和功能磁共振成像(fMRI)评估CIMT联合rTMS对血氧水平依赖(BOLD)序列分量的反应。方法:在新德里全印度医学科学研究所对慢性中风患者(N=60)进行随机对照试验,这些患者在12至36个月的指数事件中腕关节至少伸展10°,拇指外展10°,Brunnstorm期2-4;署4。患者随机分为单独CIMT组(A组n=30)和联合CIMT的rTMS组(B组n=30)。rTMS (10 Hz, 750次脉冲,110%RMT)治疗3周(5天/周)。在基线、3周(干预后)和3个月(随访)时,采用功能磁共振成像(BOLD)对患者进行放射学评估,同时评估Fugl Meyer (FM)、Barthel指数和改良Rankin量表(MRS)。结果:与A组相比,B组在3周(95%CI: -12.4至-9.3,p=0.003)和3个月(95%CI: 7.4至4.2,p=0.01)时FM有统计学显著改善。重复测量方差分析显示,在所有时间点上,平均组的差异表明所有受试者都有一定程度的改善(F=3.4, p=0.01;F = 5.4, p = 0.002)。比较两组间BOLD细胞的激活情况;结论:两组均有改善,簇数增加表明慢性脑卒中患者合并rTMS CIMT后皮质激活(fMRI-BOLD)发生改变,表明上肢功能的临床改善程度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
rTMS and CIMT for Neurofunctional Recovery in Chronic Stroke
Background: The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of high frequency rTMS with constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT) on Upper extremity motor function. Clinical Stroke Assessment Scales and fMRI was used to assess the response of CIMT with rTMS on blood oxygenation-level dependent (BOLD) sequence component. Methodology: RCT was conducted at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, on chronic stroke patients (N=60) between 12 to 36 months of index event with atleast 10° of wrist extension, 10° of thumb abduction, Brunnstorm stage 2-4; NIHSS 4–20. Patients were randomized to CIMT alone (Group A n=30) & rTMS with CIMT (Group B n=30). rTMS (10 Hz, 750 pulses with 110%RMT) was administered for 3 weeks (5days/week). Radiological Assessment of the patients was done with fMRI (BOLD) along with assessment of Fugl Meyer (FM), Barthel Index, and modified Rankin Scales (MRS) at baseline, 3 weeks (Post intervention) & 3 month (follow up) Results: FM showed statistically significant improvement in group B as compared to group A at 3 weeks (95%CI: -12.4 to -9.3, p=0.003) and 3months (95%CI: 7.4 to 4.2, p=0.01). Repeated measure ANOVA showed that the mean groups were different at all-time points indicating some degree of improvement in all the subjects (F=3.4, p=0.01; F=5.4, p=0.002). The BOLD cluster activation was compared between two groups; there was increase in the number of clusters found in Group B. Conclusion: Both the groups showed improvement, increased cluster count showing alterations in cortical activations (fMRI-BOLD) after CIMT with rTMS in patients with chronic stroke indicated more degree of clinical improvement in upper extremity function.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信