心室辅助装置植入术后的生存分析及术后并发症INTERMACS量表的预后价值

Ahmed Ahmed, Pizanis Nikolaus, Koch Achim, Carstens Henning, Rassaf Tienush, Ludike Peter, Kamler Markus
{"title":"心室辅助装置植入术后的生存分析及术后并发症INTERMACS量表的预后价值","authors":"Ahmed Ahmed, Pizanis Nikolaus, Koch Achim, Carstens Henning, Rassaf Tienush, Ludike Peter, Kamler Markus","doi":"10.35841/cardiovascular-surgery.1.1.15-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ventricular assist devices (VADs) improve survival and quality of life in patients with refractory heart failure. This study retrospectively evaluates patients’ profiles, clinical outcome in patients who underwent LVAD implantation in regard to their INTERMACS level. Methods: In a single center analysis, data of 104 patients after LVAD implantation between August 2010 and March 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. According to INTERMACS level, 3 groups were compared: Group A (INTERMCAS level 1, n=27 patients), group B (INTERMACS level 2/3, n=47) and group C (INTERMACS level 4-6, n=30). Preoperative parameters and postoperative outcome were compared between groups. Results: Mortality was higher in group A compared to group B (p=0.017) and group C (p=0.017). Sepsis was the most common post-operative complication after LVAD implantation. Conclusion: INTERMACS level was related to outcome after LVAD implantation. Optimization of preoperative volume status, preload and sepsis management are recommended to lower mortality in these patients.","PeriodicalId":79324,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular surgery (London, England)","volume":"01 1","pages":"15-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival analysis and postoperative complications after ventricular assist device implantation; prognostic value of INTERMACS scale\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Ahmed, Pizanis Nikolaus, Koch Achim, Carstens Henning, Rassaf Tienush, Ludike Peter, Kamler Markus\",\"doi\":\"10.35841/cardiovascular-surgery.1.1.15-23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Ventricular assist devices (VADs) improve survival and quality of life in patients with refractory heart failure. This study retrospectively evaluates patients’ profiles, clinical outcome in patients who underwent LVAD implantation in regard to their INTERMACS level. Methods: In a single center analysis, data of 104 patients after LVAD implantation between August 2010 and March 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. According to INTERMACS level, 3 groups were compared: Group A (INTERMCAS level 1, n=27 patients), group B (INTERMACS level 2/3, n=47) and group C (INTERMACS level 4-6, n=30). Preoperative parameters and postoperative outcome were compared between groups. Results: Mortality was higher in group A compared to group B (p=0.017) and group C (p=0.017). Sepsis was the most common post-operative complication after LVAD implantation. Conclusion: INTERMACS level was related to outcome after LVAD implantation. Optimization of preoperative volume status, preload and sepsis management are recommended to lower mortality in these patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular surgery (London, England)\",\"volume\":\"01 1\",\"pages\":\"15-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular surgery (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35841/cardiovascular-surgery.1.1.15-23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular surgery (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35841/cardiovascular-surgery.1.1.15-23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:心室辅助装置(VADs)改善难治性心力衰竭患者的生存和生活质量。本研究回顾性评估了LVAD植入患者的临床结果和INTERMACS水平。方法:采用单中心分析方法,对2010年8月至2015年3月104例LVAD植入术患者的资料进行回顾性分析。根据INTERMACS水平比较3组:A组(INTERMACS水平1,n=27例)、B组(INTERMACS水平2/3,n=47例)和C组(INTERMACS水平4-6,n=30例)。比较两组术前参数及术后结果。结果:A组死亡率高于B组(p=0.017)和C组(p=0.017)。脓毒症是LVAD植入后最常见的术后并发症。结论:INTERMACS水平与LVAD植入后的预后有关。建议优化术前容量状态、预负荷和脓毒症管理,以降低这些患者的死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survival analysis and postoperative complications after ventricular assist device implantation; prognostic value of INTERMACS scale
Background: Ventricular assist devices (VADs) improve survival and quality of life in patients with refractory heart failure. This study retrospectively evaluates patients’ profiles, clinical outcome in patients who underwent LVAD implantation in regard to their INTERMACS level. Methods: In a single center analysis, data of 104 patients after LVAD implantation between August 2010 and March 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. According to INTERMACS level, 3 groups were compared: Group A (INTERMCAS level 1, n=27 patients), group B (INTERMACS level 2/3, n=47) and group C (INTERMACS level 4-6, n=30). Preoperative parameters and postoperative outcome were compared between groups. Results: Mortality was higher in group A compared to group B (p=0.017) and group C (p=0.017). Sepsis was the most common post-operative complication after LVAD implantation. Conclusion: INTERMACS level was related to outcome after LVAD implantation. Optimization of preoperative volume status, preload and sepsis management are recommended to lower mortality in these patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信