{"title":"深度图分类中神经网络与特征提取方法的比较","authors":"Sykora, Kamencay, Hudec, Benco, Sinko","doi":"10.3849/aimt.01326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a comparison between feature extraction methods (Radon Cosine Method, Canny Contour Method, Fourier Transform, SIFT descriptor, and Hough Lines Method) and Convolutional Neural Networks (proposed CNN and pre-trained AlexNet) is presented. For the evaluation of these methods, depth maps were used. The tested data were obtained by Microsoft Kinect camera (IR depth sensor). The feature vectors were classified by the Support Vector Machine (SVM). The confusion matrix for the evaluation of experimental results was used. The row of confusion matrix represents target class of tested data and the column represents predicted class. From the experimental results, it is evident that the best results were achieved by proposed CNN (97.4%). On the other hand, the pre-trained AlexNet scored 93.7%.","PeriodicalId":39125,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Military Technology","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Neural Networks with Feature Extraction Methods for Depth Map Classification\",\"authors\":\"Sykora, Kamencay, Hudec, Benco, Sinko\",\"doi\":\"10.3849/aimt.01326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, a comparison between feature extraction methods (Radon Cosine Method, Canny Contour Method, Fourier Transform, SIFT descriptor, and Hough Lines Method) and Convolutional Neural Networks (proposed CNN and pre-trained AlexNet) is presented. For the evaluation of these methods, depth maps were used. The tested data were obtained by Microsoft Kinect camera (IR depth sensor). The feature vectors were classified by the Support Vector Machine (SVM). The confusion matrix for the evaluation of experimental results was used. The row of confusion matrix represents target class of tested data and the column represents predicted class. From the experimental results, it is evident that the best results were achieved by proposed CNN (97.4%). On the other hand, the pre-trained AlexNet scored 93.7%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Military Technology\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Military Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3849/aimt.01326\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Military Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3849/aimt.01326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Neural Networks with Feature Extraction Methods for Depth Map Classification
In this paper, a comparison between feature extraction methods (Radon Cosine Method, Canny Contour Method, Fourier Transform, SIFT descriptor, and Hough Lines Method) and Convolutional Neural Networks (proposed CNN and pre-trained AlexNet) is presented. For the evaluation of these methods, depth maps were used. The tested data were obtained by Microsoft Kinect camera (IR depth sensor). The feature vectors were classified by the Support Vector Machine (SVM). The confusion matrix for the evaluation of experimental results was used. The row of confusion matrix represents target class of tested data and the column represents predicted class. From the experimental results, it is evident that the best results were achieved by proposed CNN (97.4%). On the other hand, the pre-trained AlexNet scored 93.7%.