信息传递方式及其与老年人记忆和理解的关系

Y. Imamura, Yuki Murakami, Yoshihide Kimura, O. Maeda, M. Tsujii, Keiji Konishi, Tomoko Nakano, Yoriko Nagai, S. Mitani
{"title":"信息传递方式及其与老年人记忆和理解的关系","authors":"Y. Imamura, Yuki Murakami, Yoshihide Kimura, O. Maeda, M. Tsujii, Keiji Konishi, Tomoko Nakano, Yoriko Nagai, S. Mitani","doi":"10.35248/2329-8847.19.07.207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The global population is aging. As people age, they typically experience gradual changes in hearing, vision, coordination, balance, working memory, and cognitive function. Products, communication materials, and information provision are often accommodated for older adults. In this study, we examined various information delivery methods and their association with older adults’ working memory and cognitive function (N=18; 10 women). Participants completed tests or followed instructions that consisted of either only figures, only words, or a combination of both figures and words. First, concerning working memory, six well-known information symbols were shown to participants in one of three patterns. Each pattern was displayed on a screen for 20 sec, and working memory was measured as the number of correct items participants recalled. Cognitive function was assessed by participants’ ability to construct three different objects (giraffe, flower, and tulip) using blocks. Participants were presented with various forms of instruction concerning how to build the objects-pictures only, words only, or both pictures and words. Results revealed that the total number of items recalled were 4.3 ± 1.4, 3.1 ± 1.1, and 3.9 ± 0.8 for figures only, words only, and both figures and words, respectively (χ2=10.13, p=0.006). Higher working memory scores were associated with “figure only” and “figures and words” as compared with the “words only” method. Regarding comprehension, higher scores were associated with “figures and words” instructions as compared to the “figures only” and “words only” instructions. In conclusion, information provision for older adults should be simple and easy, visuals should be employed, and supplemental information should be explained in words to avoid any misunderstandings.","PeriodicalId":90884,"journal":{"name":"Journal of aging science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information Delivery Methods and their Association with Older Adults Memory and Comprehension\",\"authors\":\"Y. Imamura, Yuki Murakami, Yoshihide Kimura, O. Maeda, M. Tsujii, Keiji Konishi, Tomoko Nakano, Yoriko Nagai, S. Mitani\",\"doi\":\"10.35248/2329-8847.19.07.207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The global population is aging. As people age, they typically experience gradual changes in hearing, vision, coordination, balance, working memory, and cognitive function. Products, communication materials, and information provision are often accommodated for older adults. In this study, we examined various information delivery methods and their association with older adults’ working memory and cognitive function (N=18; 10 women). Participants completed tests or followed instructions that consisted of either only figures, only words, or a combination of both figures and words. First, concerning working memory, six well-known information symbols were shown to participants in one of three patterns. Each pattern was displayed on a screen for 20 sec, and working memory was measured as the number of correct items participants recalled. Cognitive function was assessed by participants’ ability to construct three different objects (giraffe, flower, and tulip) using blocks. Participants were presented with various forms of instruction concerning how to build the objects-pictures only, words only, or both pictures and words. Results revealed that the total number of items recalled were 4.3 ± 1.4, 3.1 ± 1.1, and 3.9 ± 0.8 for figures only, words only, and both figures and words, respectively (χ2=10.13, p=0.006). Higher working memory scores were associated with “figure only” and “figures and words” as compared with the “words only” method. Regarding comprehension, higher scores were associated with “figures and words” instructions as compared to the “figures only” and “words only” instructions. In conclusion, information provision for older adults should be simple and easy, visuals should be employed, and supplemental information should be explained in words to avoid any misunderstandings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of aging science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of aging science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35248/2329-8847.19.07.207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of aging science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2329-8847.19.07.207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

全球人口正在老龄化。随着年龄的增长,人们通常会在听觉、视觉、协调、平衡、工作记忆和认知功能方面经历逐渐的变化。产品、通讯材料和信息的提供通常是为老年人提供的。在本研究中,我们考察了各种信息传递方式及其与老年人工作记忆和认知功能的关系(N=18;10个女性)。参与者要么完成测试,要么遵循指令,要么只包含数字,要么只包含单词,要么同时包含数字和单词。首先,在工作记忆方面,研究人员以三种模式中的一种向参与者展示了六个众所周知的信息符号。每个模式都在屏幕上显示20秒,工作记忆以参与者回忆起的正确项目的数量来衡量。认知功能是通过参与者用积木构建三种不同物体(长颈鹿、花和郁金香)的能力来评估的。研究人员向参与者提供了关于如何构建物体的各种形式的指导——只有图片,只有文字,或者既有图片又有文字。结果显示,全图、全词、全图、全词分别为4.3±1.4、3.1±1.1、3.9±0.8项(χ2=10.13, p=0.006)。与“只有文字”的方法相比,“只有数字”和“有数字和文字”的方法的工作记忆得分更高。在理解方面,与“只有数字”和“只有单词”的指令相比,“数字和单词”的指令得分更高。总之,为老年人提供的信息应该简单易懂,使用视觉效果,补充信息应该用文字解释,避免误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Information Delivery Methods and their Association with Older Adults Memory and Comprehension
The global population is aging. As people age, they typically experience gradual changes in hearing, vision, coordination, balance, working memory, and cognitive function. Products, communication materials, and information provision are often accommodated for older adults. In this study, we examined various information delivery methods and their association with older adults’ working memory and cognitive function (N=18; 10 women). Participants completed tests or followed instructions that consisted of either only figures, only words, or a combination of both figures and words. First, concerning working memory, six well-known information symbols were shown to participants in one of three patterns. Each pattern was displayed on a screen for 20 sec, and working memory was measured as the number of correct items participants recalled. Cognitive function was assessed by participants’ ability to construct three different objects (giraffe, flower, and tulip) using blocks. Participants were presented with various forms of instruction concerning how to build the objects-pictures only, words only, or both pictures and words. Results revealed that the total number of items recalled were 4.3 ± 1.4, 3.1 ± 1.1, and 3.9 ± 0.8 for figures only, words only, and both figures and words, respectively (χ2=10.13, p=0.006). Higher working memory scores were associated with “figure only” and “figures and words” as compared with the “words only” method. Regarding comprehension, higher scores were associated with “figures and words” instructions as compared to the “figures only” and “words only” instructions. In conclusion, information provision for older adults should be simple and easy, visuals should be employed, and supplemental information should be explained in words to avoid any misunderstandings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信