危重外科患者接受机械通气静息能量消耗的评价

Hong Chen, Jia Sun, L. Fei, Jian-gua Jia
{"title":"危重外科患者接受机械通气静息能量消耗的评价","authors":"Hong Chen, Jia Sun, L. Fei, Jian-gua Jia","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2011.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To compare the indirect calorimetry(IC) measured resting energy expenditure(MREE) with adjusted Harris-Benedict formula calculating resting energy expenditure(CREE) in the mechanically ventilated surgical critically ill patients and to evaluate the relationship between the resting energy expenditure(REE) with the severity of illness.Methods Twenty-one patients undergonging mechanical ventilation for critical illness in the intensive care unit of general surgery between August 2008 and February 2010 were included in this study.Data during the study period of nutrition support were collected for computation of the severity of critical illness by acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ scores(APACHE Ⅱ scores) and organ dysfunction scores(Marshall scores).MREE was measured by using IC of the MedGraphics CCM/D System within the first 7 d after nutrition therapy.CREE was calculated by using the HarrisBenedict formula adjusted with correction factors for illness at the same time.According to APACHE Ⅱ scores on admission,the enrolled patients were divided into two groups: APACHEⅡ score ≥20 scores group(n=8) and APACHE Ⅱ score 20 scores group(n=13),and the differences between MREE and CREE of patients in two groups were determined.Results The reduction of variation tendency in CREE other than MREE in the enrolled patients within the first week of nutritional support was statistical significance(P0.001).The CREE of patients((1 984.49±461.83) kcal/d) was significantly higher than the MREE((1 563.88±496.93) kcal/d) during the first week of nutritional support(P0.001).The MREE on the 0,1,2,and 4 d after nutrition therapy were statistically significant lower than CREE at the same time interval in these patients(P0.01),and the differences at the other time points were not significant(P0.05).There was a trend towards a reduction in APACHE Ⅱ and Marshall scores within the first week of nutrition therapy that reached statistical significance(P0.001).During the first week of nutrition therapy,APACHEⅡ and Marshall scores of patients in ≥20 scores group were significantly higher than those in 20 scores group,respectively(P0.05 or P0.01),and the reductions of APACHE Ⅱ scores and Marshall scores were significant in patients of two groups(P0.001).A significant positive correlation was found between CREE with APACHE Ⅱ scores(r=0.656,P0.001) and Marshall scores(r=0.608,P0.001) in patients within the first week after nutrition support.Although no statistically significant correlation was observed between MREE and APACHEⅡ scores(r=-0.045,P=0.563),a significant positive correlation was observed between MREE and Marshall scores(r=0.263,P=0.001) within the first week after nutrition therapy.There was no correlation between MREE and CREE(r=0.064,P=0.408) in patients at the same time interval.The reduction of MREE of patients in ≥20 scores group other than in 20 scores group was statistically significant within the first week after nutrition therapy(P=0.034).In addition,the MREE of patients in ≥20 scores group were not significantly different from those in 20 scores group(P0.05),and the mean CREE was not different in two groups patients within the first week of nutritional therapy((1 999.55±372.73) kcal/d vs.(1 918.39±375.27) kcal/d,P=0.887).CREE was significantly higher than MREE of patients in ≥20 scores group within the first week except the 3 d and 5 d after nutrition therapy(P0.05),while in 20 scores group CREE was significantly higher than MREE in patients only within the first 3 d after nutrition therapy(P0.05 or P0.01).MREE and CREE of patients in ≥20 scores group were not different from those in 20 scores group,respectively(P0.05).Conclusions The Harris-Benedict formula adjusted with correction factors for severity of illness systematically overestimates the REE,especially in patients with APACHEⅡ scores ≥20 scores on admission.Indirect calorimetry is the criterion method of choice for determining resting metabolic rate and caloric need for nutrition support in the mechanical ventilated critically ill patients.","PeriodicalId":58876,"journal":{"name":"中国普外基础与临床杂志","volume":"19 1","pages":"312-315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of resting energy expenditure in critically ill surgical patients receiving mechanical ventilation\",\"authors\":\"Hong Chen, Jia Sun, L. Fei, Jian-gua Jia\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2011.05.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective To compare the indirect calorimetry(IC) measured resting energy expenditure(MREE) with adjusted Harris-Benedict formula calculating resting energy expenditure(CREE) in the mechanically ventilated surgical critically ill patients and to evaluate the relationship between the resting energy expenditure(REE) with the severity of illness.Methods Twenty-one patients undergonging mechanical ventilation for critical illness in the intensive care unit of general surgery between August 2008 and February 2010 were included in this study.Data during the study period of nutrition support were collected for computation of the severity of critical illness by acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ scores(APACHE Ⅱ scores) and organ dysfunction scores(Marshall scores).MREE was measured by using IC of the MedGraphics CCM/D System within the first 7 d after nutrition therapy.CREE was calculated by using the HarrisBenedict formula adjusted with correction factors for illness at the same time.According to APACHE Ⅱ scores on admission,the enrolled patients were divided into two groups: APACHEⅡ score ≥20 scores group(n=8) and APACHE Ⅱ score 20 scores group(n=13),and the differences between MREE and CREE of patients in two groups were determined.Results The reduction of variation tendency in CREE other than MREE in the enrolled patients within the first week of nutritional support was statistical significance(P0.001).The CREE of patients((1 984.49±461.83) kcal/d) was significantly higher than the MREE((1 563.88±496.93) kcal/d) during the first week of nutritional support(P0.001).The MREE on the 0,1,2,and 4 d after nutrition therapy were statistically significant lower than CREE at the same time interval in these patients(P0.01),and the differences at the other time points were not significant(P0.05).There was a trend towards a reduction in APACHE Ⅱ and Marshall scores within the first week of nutrition therapy that reached statistical significance(P0.001).During the first week of nutrition therapy,APACHEⅡ and Marshall scores of patients in ≥20 scores group were significantly higher than those in 20 scores group,respectively(P0.05 or P0.01),and the reductions of APACHE Ⅱ scores and Marshall scores were significant in patients of two groups(P0.001).A significant positive correlation was found between CREE with APACHE Ⅱ scores(r=0.656,P0.001) and Marshall scores(r=0.608,P0.001) in patients within the first week after nutrition support.Although no statistically significant correlation was observed between MREE and APACHEⅡ scores(r=-0.045,P=0.563),a significant positive correlation was observed between MREE and Marshall scores(r=0.263,P=0.001) within the first week after nutrition therapy.There was no correlation between MREE and CREE(r=0.064,P=0.408) in patients at the same time interval.The reduction of MREE of patients in ≥20 scores group other than in 20 scores group was statistically significant within the first week after nutrition therapy(P=0.034).In addition,the MREE of patients in ≥20 scores group were not significantly different from those in 20 scores group(P0.05),and the mean CREE was not different in two groups patients within the first week of nutritional therapy((1 999.55±372.73) kcal/d vs.(1 918.39±375.27) kcal/d,P=0.887).CREE was significantly higher than MREE of patients in ≥20 scores group within the first week except the 3 d and 5 d after nutrition therapy(P0.05),while in 20 scores group CREE was significantly higher than MREE in patients only within the first 3 d after nutrition therapy(P0.05 or P0.01).MREE and CREE of patients in ≥20 scores group were not different from those in 20 scores group,respectively(P0.05).Conclusions The Harris-Benedict formula adjusted with correction factors for severity of illness systematically overestimates the REE,especially in patients with APACHEⅡ scores ≥20 scores on admission.Indirect calorimetry is the criterion method of choice for determining resting metabolic rate and caloric need for nutrition support in the mechanical ventilated critically ill patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":58876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国普外基础与临床杂志\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"312-315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国普外基础与临床杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2011.05.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国普外基础与临床杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2011.05.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较间接量热法(IC)测量的外科机械通气危重患者静息能量消耗(MREE)与调整后的Harris-Benedict公式计算的静息能量消耗(CREE),并评价静息能量消耗(REE)与病情严重程度的关系。方法选取2008年8月至2010年2月在普通外科重症监护病房接受机械通气治疗的危重症患者21例。收集营养支持研究期间的数据,通过急性生理和慢性健康评估Ⅱ评分(APACHEⅡ评分)和器官功能障碍评分(Marshall评分)计算危重疾病的严重程度。在营养治疗后的前7天内,使用MedGraphics CCM/D系统的IC测量MREE。CREE的计算采用HarrisBenedict公式,同时对疾病校正因子进行调整。根据入院时APACHEⅡ评分,将入组患者分为APACHEⅡ评分≥20分组(n=8)和APACHEⅡ评分≥20分组(n=13),比较两组患者MREE和CREE的差异。结果在营养支持的第一周内,受试者的CREE变化趋势比MREE变化趋势降低有统计学意义(P0.001)。患者在营养支持第一周的CREE(1 984.49±461.83)kcal/d)显著高于MREE(1 563.88±496.93)kcal/d (P0.001)。这些患者在营养治疗后0、1、2、4 d的MREE低于同一时间间隔的CREE,差异均有统计学意义(P0.01),其他时间点差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。在营养治疗的第一周内,APACHEⅡ和Marshall评分有降低的趋势,达到统计学意义(P0.001)。营养治疗第1周,≥20分组患者APACHEⅡ和Marshall评分分别显著高于20分组(P0.05或P0.01),两组患者APACHEⅡ评分和Marshall评分均显著降低(P0.001)。营养支持后1周内患者的CREE评分与APACHEⅡ评分(r=0.656,P0.001)和Marshall评分(r=0.608,P0.001)呈显著正相关。虽然MREE与APACHEⅡ评分之间无统计学意义的相关(r=-0.045,P=0.563),但在营养治疗后的第一周内,MREE与Marshall评分之间存在显著的正相关(r=0.263,P=0.001)。同一时间间隔患者的MREE与CREE无相关性(r=0.064,P=0.408)。营养治疗后第1周内,评分≥20分组患者MREE的降低与评分为20分组患者相比有统计学意义(P=0.034)。≥20分组患者的MREE与20分组患者比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05),两组患者在营养治疗第一周内的平均CREE比较差异无统计学意义((1 999.55±372.73)kcal/d vs(1 918.39±375.27)kcal/d,P=0.887)。≥20分组患者除营养治疗后第3、5天CREE均显著高于MREE (P0.05),而20分组患者仅在营养治疗后第3天CREE均显著高于MREE (P0.05或P0.01)。≥20分组患者的MREE、CREE与20分组比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。经疾病严重程度校正因子调整后的Harris-Benedict公式系统性地高估了REE,尤其是入院时APACHEⅡ评分≥20分的患者。间接量热法是测定机械通气危重病人静息代谢率和营养支持所需热量的标准方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of resting energy expenditure in critically ill surgical patients receiving mechanical ventilation
Objective To compare the indirect calorimetry(IC) measured resting energy expenditure(MREE) with adjusted Harris-Benedict formula calculating resting energy expenditure(CREE) in the mechanically ventilated surgical critically ill patients and to evaluate the relationship between the resting energy expenditure(REE) with the severity of illness.Methods Twenty-one patients undergonging mechanical ventilation for critical illness in the intensive care unit of general surgery between August 2008 and February 2010 were included in this study.Data during the study period of nutrition support were collected for computation of the severity of critical illness by acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ scores(APACHE Ⅱ scores) and organ dysfunction scores(Marshall scores).MREE was measured by using IC of the MedGraphics CCM/D System within the first 7 d after nutrition therapy.CREE was calculated by using the HarrisBenedict formula adjusted with correction factors for illness at the same time.According to APACHE Ⅱ scores on admission,the enrolled patients were divided into two groups: APACHEⅡ score ≥20 scores group(n=8) and APACHE Ⅱ score 20 scores group(n=13),and the differences between MREE and CREE of patients in two groups were determined.Results The reduction of variation tendency in CREE other than MREE in the enrolled patients within the first week of nutritional support was statistical significance(P0.001).The CREE of patients((1 984.49±461.83) kcal/d) was significantly higher than the MREE((1 563.88±496.93) kcal/d) during the first week of nutritional support(P0.001).The MREE on the 0,1,2,and 4 d after nutrition therapy were statistically significant lower than CREE at the same time interval in these patients(P0.01),and the differences at the other time points were not significant(P0.05).There was a trend towards a reduction in APACHE Ⅱ and Marshall scores within the first week of nutrition therapy that reached statistical significance(P0.001).During the first week of nutrition therapy,APACHEⅡ and Marshall scores of patients in ≥20 scores group were significantly higher than those in 20 scores group,respectively(P0.05 or P0.01),and the reductions of APACHE Ⅱ scores and Marshall scores were significant in patients of two groups(P0.001).A significant positive correlation was found between CREE with APACHE Ⅱ scores(r=0.656,P0.001) and Marshall scores(r=0.608,P0.001) in patients within the first week after nutrition support.Although no statistically significant correlation was observed between MREE and APACHEⅡ scores(r=-0.045,P=0.563),a significant positive correlation was observed between MREE and Marshall scores(r=0.263,P=0.001) within the first week after nutrition therapy.There was no correlation between MREE and CREE(r=0.064,P=0.408) in patients at the same time interval.The reduction of MREE of patients in ≥20 scores group other than in 20 scores group was statistically significant within the first week after nutrition therapy(P=0.034).In addition,the MREE of patients in ≥20 scores group were not significantly different from those in 20 scores group(P0.05),and the mean CREE was not different in two groups patients within the first week of nutritional therapy((1 999.55±372.73) kcal/d vs.(1 918.39±375.27) kcal/d,P=0.887).CREE was significantly higher than MREE of patients in ≥20 scores group within the first week except the 3 d and 5 d after nutrition therapy(P0.05),while in 20 scores group CREE was significantly higher than MREE in patients only within the first 3 d after nutrition therapy(P0.05 or P0.01).MREE and CREE of patients in ≥20 scores group were not different from those in 20 scores group,respectively(P0.05).Conclusions The Harris-Benedict formula adjusted with correction factors for severity of illness systematically overestimates the REE,especially in patients with APACHEⅡ scores ≥20 scores on admission.Indirect calorimetry is the criterion method of choice for determining resting metabolic rate and caloric need for nutrition support in the mechanical ventilated critically ill patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9008
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信