Tamara Hefferon, K. Somers, I. Kass, S. Curtis, Savanah Winner, Aaron B Thomas
{"title":"每日短时间活动和锻炼计划对慢性腰痛患者的影响:一项初步研究","authors":"Tamara Hefferon, K. Somers, I. Kass, S. Curtis, Savanah Winner, Aaron B Thomas","doi":"10.35248/2157-7595.11.S1.317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Low back pain has been a well-researched topic and it is estimated to affect nearly 82% of Americans at some point in their life. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the effects of a daily short duration mobility program produce significantly different results in pain and disability when compared to the same amount of brisk daily walking. Methods: A randomized control trial of 15 participants with a primary complaint of chronic low back pain for at least three months were assigned to a walking group (N=5) or a dynamic stretching group (N=10). All participants received 5 outcome measures: Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Fear Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire (FABQ), Pain Catastrophizing Scale, SF-36 and oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Subjects placed into the walking group were asked to walk at a brisk, self-selected pace for 12 minutes at least 5 days a week. Brisk was defined as at least a 4 on a 0-10 RPE scale. Participants in the mobility group were instructed in a 12 minute stretching program, which they were also asked to perform at least 5 days a week. Mobility group participants were provided a you tube link with the stretching program. Both groups were given accountability logs and were contacted once a week to assure adherence. Subjects performed the walking or mobility programs for 3 weeks after which they were re-evaluated using the same criteria as used in the initial evaluation. Alpha level ≤ 0.05 was selected for significance for all comparisons. Results: The stretching group showed significantly improved scores related to fear avoidance behavior questionnaire (p=0.019) and the pain catastrophizing scale (p=0.026) when compared to the walking group. Additionally, significant differences were noted in the stretching group for Visual Analog Scale (p=0.011), oswestry disability index (p=0.017), SF-36 Energy/Fatigue (p=0.047), SF-36 Pain (p=0.027) and SF-36 General Health (p=0.041). Conclusion: In conclusion, a daily short duration mobility and exercise program was more effective than walking in decreasing fear avoidance behavior and pain catastrophizing in subjects with chronic low back pain. Clinical Relevance: This study is clinically relevant given that it demonstrates prescription of a mobility program may be more beneficial than a walking program for patients with chronic low back pain. Additionally, this study supports the use of a telehealth application in the treatment of chronic low back pain.","PeriodicalId":89697,"journal":{"name":"Journal of yoga & physical therapy","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of a Daily Short Duration Mobility and Exercise Program on Individuals with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study\",\"authors\":\"Tamara Hefferon, K. Somers, I. Kass, S. Curtis, Savanah Winner, Aaron B Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.35248/2157-7595.11.S1.317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Low back pain has been a well-researched topic and it is estimated to affect nearly 82% of Americans at some point in their life. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the effects of a daily short duration mobility program produce significantly different results in pain and disability when compared to the same amount of brisk daily walking. Methods: A randomized control trial of 15 participants with a primary complaint of chronic low back pain for at least three months were assigned to a walking group (N=5) or a dynamic stretching group (N=10). All participants received 5 outcome measures: Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Fear Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire (FABQ), Pain Catastrophizing Scale, SF-36 and oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Subjects placed into the walking group were asked to walk at a brisk, self-selected pace for 12 minutes at least 5 days a week. Brisk was defined as at least a 4 on a 0-10 RPE scale. Participants in the mobility group were instructed in a 12 minute stretching program, which they were also asked to perform at least 5 days a week. Mobility group participants were provided a you tube link with the stretching program. Both groups were given accountability logs and were contacted once a week to assure adherence. Subjects performed the walking or mobility programs for 3 weeks after which they were re-evaluated using the same criteria as used in the initial evaluation. Alpha level ≤ 0.05 was selected for significance for all comparisons. Results: The stretching group showed significantly improved scores related to fear avoidance behavior questionnaire (p=0.019) and the pain catastrophizing scale (p=0.026) when compared to the walking group. Additionally, significant differences were noted in the stretching group for Visual Analog Scale (p=0.011), oswestry disability index (p=0.017), SF-36 Energy/Fatigue (p=0.047), SF-36 Pain (p=0.027) and SF-36 General Health (p=0.041). Conclusion: In conclusion, a daily short duration mobility and exercise program was more effective than walking in decreasing fear avoidance behavior and pain catastrophizing in subjects with chronic low back pain. Clinical Relevance: This study is clinically relevant given that it demonstrates prescription of a mobility program may be more beneficial than a walking program for patients with chronic low back pain. Additionally, this study supports the use of a telehealth application in the treatment of chronic low back pain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of yoga & physical therapy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of yoga & physical therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35248/2157-7595.11.S1.317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of yoga & physical therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2157-7595.11.S1.317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:腰痛一直是一个被充分研究的话题,据估计,近82%的美国人在他们生命中的某个阶段受到了腰痛的影响。本研究的目的是确定与相同量的每日快走相比,每日短时间活动计划对疼痛和残疾的影响是否显著不同。方法:一项随机对照试验,15名主要主诉为慢性腰痛至少3个月的参与者被分配到步行组(N=5)或动态拉伸组(N=10)。所有参与者接受5项结果测量:视觉模拟量表(VAS)、恐惧回避行为问卷(FABQ)、疼痛灾难化量表(Pain disaster - zing Scale)、SF-36和oswestry Disability Index (ODI)。被分到步行组的受试者被要求以轻快的、自我选择的速度步行12分钟,每周至少5天。轻快被定义为在0-10的RPE量表中至少得到4分。活动组的参与者被要求进行12分钟的伸展运动,他们也被要求每周至少进行5天。活动组的参与者被提供了一个与拉伸计划有关的视频链接。两组都有问责日志,并每周联系一次以确保遵守。受试者进行了3周的步行或活动项目,之后使用与初始评估相同的标准对他们进行重新评估。所有比较均以α水平≤0.05为显著性。结果:与步行组相比,拉伸组在恐惧回避行为问卷得分(p=0.019)和疼痛灾难化量表得分(p=0.026)均有显著提高。此外,拉伸组在视觉模拟量表(p=0.011)、睡眠功能障碍指数(p=0.017)、SF-36能量/疲劳(p=0.047)、SF-36疼痛(p=0.027)和SF-36一般健康(p=0.041)方面也有显著差异。结论:在慢性腰痛患者的恐惧回避行为和疼痛灾难化方面,每日短时间活动和锻炼计划比步行更有效。临床相关性:该研究具有临床相关性,因为它证明了对于慢性腰痛患者,活动计划的处方可能比步行计划更有益。此外,本研究支持使用远程医疗应用程序治疗慢性腰痛。
The Effects of a Daily Short Duration Mobility and Exercise Program on Individuals with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study
Purpose: Low back pain has been a well-researched topic and it is estimated to affect nearly 82% of Americans at some point in their life. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the effects of a daily short duration mobility program produce significantly different results in pain and disability when compared to the same amount of brisk daily walking. Methods: A randomized control trial of 15 participants with a primary complaint of chronic low back pain for at least three months were assigned to a walking group (N=5) or a dynamic stretching group (N=10). All participants received 5 outcome measures: Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Fear Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire (FABQ), Pain Catastrophizing Scale, SF-36 and oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Subjects placed into the walking group were asked to walk at a brisk, self-selected pace for 12 minutes at least 5 days a week. Brisk was defined as at least a 4 on a 0-10 RPE scale. Participants in the mobility group were instructed in a 12 minute stretching program, which they were also asked to perform at least 5 days a week. Mobility group participants were provided a you tube link with the stretching program. Both groups were given accountability logs and were contacted once a week to assure adherence. Subjects performed the walking or mobility programs for 3 weeks after which they were re-evaluated using the same criteria as used in the initial evaluation. Alpha level ≤ 0.05 was selected for significance for all comparisons. Results: The stretching group showed significantly improved scores related to fear avoidance behavior questionnaire (p=0.019) and the pain catastrophizing scale (p=0.026) when compared to the walking group. Additionally, significant differences were noted in the stretching group for Visual Analog Scale (p=0.011), oswestry disability index (p=0.017), SF-36 Energy/Fatigue (p=0.047), SF-36 Pain (p=0.027) and SF-36 General Health (p=0.041). Conclusion: In conclusion, a daily short duration mobility and exercise program was more effective than walking in decreasing fear avoidance behavior and pain catastrophizing in subjects with chronic low back pain. Clinical Relevance: This study is clinically relevant given that it demonstrates prescription of a mobility program may be more beneficial than a walking program for patients with chronic low back pain. Additionally, this study supports the use of a telehealth application in the treatment of chronic low back pain.