{"title":"图灵测试，或者把精神品质归因于机器时的语言误用","authors":"J. Bremer, M. Flasiński","doi":"10.35765/forphil.2022.2701.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The views on the Turing test of the four influential thinkers who belong to the tradition of analytic philosophy, namely Ludwig Wittgenstein, Noam Chomsky, Hilary Putnam and John R. Searle, are discussed in the paper. Based on various philosophical/linguistic beliefs, they differ in their assessment of both the significance and the suitability of the imitation game for the development of cognitive science and Artificial Intelligence models. At the same time, they share the rejection of treating TT as the test for the “thinking of machines”. It seems to result from the caring for the proper use of language which is the fundamental methodological commitment of analytic philosophy.","PeriodicalId":34385,"journal":{"name":"Forum Philosophicum","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1970-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Turing Test, or a Misuse of Language when Ascribing Mental Qualities to Machines\",\"authors\":\"J. Bremer, M. Flasiński\",\"doi\":\"10.35765/forphil.2022.2701.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The views on the Turing test of the four influential thinkers who belong to the tradition of analytic philosophy, namely Ludwig Wittgenstein, Noam Chomsky, Hilary Putnam and John R. Searle, are discussed in the paper. Based on various philosophical/linguistic beliefs, they differ in their assessment of both the significance and the suitability of the imitation game for the development of cognitive science and Artificial Intelligence models. At the same time, they share the rejection of treating TT as the test for the “thinking of machines”. It seems to result from the caring for the proper use of language which is the fundamental methodological commitment of analytic philosophy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forum Philosophicum\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1970-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forum Philosophicum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35765/forphil.2022.2701.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum Philosophicum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35765/forphil.2022.2701.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Turing Test, or a Misuse of Language when Ascribing Mental Qualities to Machines
The views on the Turing test of the four influential thinkers who belong to the tradition of analytic philosophy, namely Ludwig Wittgenstein, Noam Chomsky, Hilary Putnam and John R. Searle, are discussed in the paper. Based on various philosophical/linguistic beliefs, they differ in their assessment of both the significance and the suitability of the imitation game for the development of cognitive science and Artificial Intelligence models. At the same time, they share the rejection of treating TT as the test for the “thinking of machines”. It seems to result from the caring for the proper use of language which is the fundamental methodological commitment of analytic philosophy.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
