Hong-ming Zheng, Jun-Ying Sun, Sheng-jie Dong, Ye Jin, Qiang Wang
{"title":"后路稳定型与后路交叉关节保留型全膝关节置换术中期疗效比较","authors":"Hong-ming Zheng, Jun-Ying Sun, Sheng-jie Dong, Ye Jin, Qiang Wang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-4904.2012.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To evaluate the intermediate term efficacy of posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty(TKA) and posterior cruciate-retaining(CR) TKA and explore the clinical related problem.Methods The clinical data of 84 patients (87 knees) who treated with primary TKA from May 1992 to May 2006 were analyzed retrospectively.The intermediate term efficacy was compared between PS TKA (PS group,41 cases with 43 knees) and CR TKA (CR group,43 cases with 44 knees).Results All the patients were followed up for 5-10(7.6 ± 1.5 ) years,no infection,dislocation or neurovascular injury occurred in both groups.But 1 knee occurred intraoperative posterolateral femoral condyle fracture in PS group.The lateral retinacular release rate was 2.3% ( 1/43 ) and 2.3% (1/44) in PS group and CR group,respectively.The incidence of anterior knee pain was 4.7%(2/43 ) and 4.5%(2/44) after 6 months surgery in PS group and CR group.The incidence of anterior knee pain was 0 at the end of follow-up in both groups.There was no significant difference in the lateral retinacular release rate and the incidence of anterior knee pain between two groups (P >0.05).The range of motion and American knee society score (KSS) was similar and no statistical difference was found between two groups(P > 0.05 ).The incidence of patellar tilt or subluxation in X-ray was 2.3% (1/43) and 2.3% (1/44) at the end of follow-up in PS group and CR group.There was no significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05 ).At the end of follow-up,no osteolysis,X-ray radiolucent zone and prosthesis loosening were found in both groups.There was no revision owing to loosening or other reasons.Conclusions The intermediate term efficacy of PS TKA and CR TKA is near a tie.However,the future efficacy still need further follow-up. \n \nKey words: \nArthroplasty,replacement,knee; Treatment outcome","PeriodicalId":10229,"journal":{"name":"中国医师进修杂志","volume":"35 1","pages":"6-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of intermediate term efficacy between posterior stabilized and posterior cruciateretaining total knee arthroplasty\",\"authors\":\"Hong-ming Zheng, Jun-Ying Sun, Sheng-jie Dong, Ye Jin, Qiang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-4904.2012.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective To evaluate the intermediate term efficacy of posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty(TKA) and posterior cruciate-retaining(CR) TKA and explore the clinical related problem.Methods The clinical data of 84 patients (87 knees) who treated with primary TKA from May 1992 to May 2006 were analyzed retrospectively.The intermediate term efficacy was compared between PS TKA (PS group,41 cases with 43 knees) and CR TKA (CR group,43 cases with 44 knees).Results All the patients were followed up for 5-10(7.6 ± 1.5 ) years,no infection,dislocation or neurovascular injury occurred in both groups.But 1 knee occurred intraoperative posterolateral femoral condyle fracture in PS group.The lateral retinacular release rate was 2.3% ( 1/43 ) and 2.3% (1/44) in PS group and CR group,respectively.The incidence of anterior knee pain was 4.7%(2/43 ) and 4.5%(2/44) after 6 months surgery in PS group and CR group.The incidence of anterior knee pain was 0 at the end of follow-up in both groups.There was no significant difference in the lateral retinacular release rate and the incidence of anterior knee pain between two groups (P >0.05).The range of motion and American knee society score (KSS) was similar and no statistical difference was found between two groups(P > 0.05 ).The incidence of patellar tilt or subluxation in X-ray was 2.3% (1/43) and 2.3% (1/44) at the end of follow-up in PS group and CR group.There was no significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05 ).At the end of follow-up,no osteolysis,X-ray radiolucent zone and prosthesis loosening were found in both groups.There was no revision owing to loosening or other reasons.Conclusions The intermediate term efficacy of PS TKA and CR TKA is near a tie.However,the future efficacy still need further follow-up. \\n \\nKey words: \\nArthroplasty,replacement,knee; Treatment outcome\",\"PeriodicalId\":10229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国医师进修杂志\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"6-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国医师进修杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-4904.2012.05.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国医师进修杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-4904.2012.05.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of intermediate term efficacy between posterior stabilized and posterior cruciateretaining total knee arthroplasty
Objective To evaluate the intermediate term efficacy of posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty(TKA) and posterior cruciate-retaining(CR) TKA and explore the clinical related problem.Methods The clinical data of 84 patients (87 knees) who treated with primary TKA from May 1992 to May 2006 were analyzed retrospectively.The intermediate term efficacy was compared between PS TKA (PS group,41 cases with 43 knees) and CR TKA (CR group,43 cases with 44 knees).Results All the patients were followed up for 5-10(7.6 ± 1.5 ) years,no infection,dislocation or neurovascular injury occurred in both groups.But 1 knee occurred intraoperative posterolateral femoral condyle fracture in PS group.The lateral retinacular release rate was 2.3% ( 1/43 ) and 2.3% (1/44) in PS group and CR group,respectively.The incidence of anterior knee pain was 4.7%(2/43 ) and 4.5%(2/44) after 6 months surgery in PS group and CR group.The incidence of anterior knee pain was 0 at the end of follow-up in both groups.There was no significant difference in the lateral retinacular release rate and the incidence of anterior knee pain between two groups (P >0.05).The range of motion and American knee society score (KSS) was similar and no statistical difference was found between two groups(P > 0.05 ).The incidence of patellar tilt or subluxation in X-ray was 2.3% (1/43) and 2.3% (1/44) at the end of follow-up in PS group and CR group.There was no significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05 ).At the end of follow-up,no osteolysis,X-ray radiolucent zone and prosthesis loosening were found in both groups.There was no revision owing to loosening or other reasons.Conclusions The intermediate term efficacy of PS TKA and CR TKA is near a tie.However,the future efficacy still need further follow-up.
Key words:
Arthroplasty,replacement,knee; Treatment outcome
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine (founded in 1978, monthly) is one of the series of journals of the Chinese Medical Association (CMA) under the supervision of the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association (CMA) and Dalian Institute of Theoretical Medicine (DITM). It is a core journal of Chinese science and technology, a statistical source journal of Chinese scientific and technical papers, and a statistical source journal of China Academic Journal Impact Factor Annual Report. The journal adheres to the purpose of using continuing medical education and post training, highlights new theories, new knowledge, new methods and new technologies, and focuses on the combination of theory and practice, and the combination of popularisation and improvement.
Main columns: Special tutorials, expert forums, clinical treatises, clinical experience, reviews and lectures, continuing medical education, teaching and research, advanced training forum, drugs and clinics, overview of progress, introduction of new technologies, imaging and clinics, lessons learnt, discussions and evaluations, case reports, discussions of clinical cases, conference proceedings, and domestic and international academic developments.
The main target readers are clinical medical personnel in internal medicine, surgery, gynaecology, paediatrics and ophthalmology.