查询优先DL-Lite知识库下的词典修复

Q4 Multidisciplinary
Telli Abdelmoutia, H. Ghassen, Omri Nazih
{"title":"查询优先DL-Lite知识库下的词典修复","authors":"Telli Abdelmoutia, H. Ghassen, Omri Nazih","doi":"10.37575/B/SCI/0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the issue of inconsistency in responses from various DL-Lite knowledge bases. This inconsistency problem is at the origin of several sources of assertions with different levels of reliability. The various solutions proposed in the literature that have to do with retrieving an exhaustive and coherent list of responses are not satisfactory from the point of view of reliability and performance. The solution that we present to solve this problem is articulated around two phases: the first phase consists of interrogating the different knowledge bases to retrieve all of the possible answers, which may be inconsistent and/or contradictory, and the second phase consists in repairing these inconsistencies and/or contradictions. To do this, we propose an approach based on three algorithms that we developed in this framework: a first algorithm for non-defeat repair, a second algorithm for lexicographic repair and a third algorithm for non-defeat repair based on lexicography of possible inconsistent responses. The experimental study carried out on the different data collections, as well as the analysis of the results obtained, confirm the performance of our approach as well as its efficiency in regards to productivity and complexity in terms of execution time.","PeriodicalId":39024,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Journal of King Faisal University","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lexicographic Repair Under Querying Prioritised DL-Lite Knowledge Bases\",\"authors\":\"Telli Abdelmoutia, H. Ghassen, Omri Nazih\",\"doi\":\"10.37575/B/SCI/0054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses the issue of inconsistency in responses from various DL-Lite knowledge bases. This inconsistency problem is at the origin of several sources of assertions with different levels of reliability. The various solutions proposed in the literature that have to do with retrieving an exhaustive and coherent list of responses are not satisfactory from the point of view of reliability and performance. The solution that we present to solve this problem is articulated around two phases: the first phase consists of interrogating the different knowledge bases to retrieve all of the possible answers, which may be inconsistent and/or contradictory, and the second phase consists in repairing these inconsistencies and/or contradictions. To do this, we propose an approach based on three algorithms that we developed in this framework: a first algorithm for non-defeat repair, a second algorithm for lexicographic repair and a third algorithm for non-defeat repair based on lexicography of possible inconsistent responses. The experimental study carried out on the different data collections, as well as the analysis of the results obtained, confirm the performance of our approach as well as its efficiency in regards to productivity and complexity in terms of execution time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Journal of King Faisal University\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Journal of King Faisal University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37575/B/SCI/0054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Journal of King Faisal University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37575/B/SCI/0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文讨论了来自各种DL-Lite知识库的响应中的不一致问题。这种不一致问题是具有不同可靠性级别的断言的几个来源的根源。从可靠性和性能的角度来看,文献中提出的各种解决方案都与检索详尽和连贯的响应列表有关。我们提出的解决这个问题的方案围绕两个阶段进行阐述:第一阶段包括询问不同的知识库,以检索所有可能的答案,这些答案可能不一致和/或矛盾,第二阶段包括修复这些不一致和/或矛盾。为了做到这一点,我们提出了一种基于我们在这个框架中开发的三种算法的方法:第一种算法用于非失败修复,第二种算法用于字典修复,第三种算法用于基于字典可能不一致响应的非失败修复。对不同的数据收集进行了实验研究,并对所获得的结果进行了分析,证实了我们的方法的性能,以及它在生产力方面的效率和在执行时间方面的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lexicographic Repair Under Querying Prioritised DL-Lite Knowledge Bases
This article discusses the issue of inconsistency in responses from various DL-Lite knowledge bases. This inconsistency problem is at the origin of several sources of assertions with different levels of reliability. The various solutions proposed in the literature that have to do with retrieving an exhaustive and coherent list of responses are not satisfactory from the point of view of reliability and performance. The solution that we present to solve this problem is articulated around two phases: the first phase consists of interrogating the different knowledge bases to retrieve all of the possible answers, which may be inconsistent and/or contradictory, and the second phase consists in repairing these inconsistencies and/or contradictions. To do this, we propose an approach based on three algorithms that we developed in this framework: a first algorithm for non-defeat repair, a second algorithm for lexicographic repair and a third algorithm for non-defeat repair based on lexicography of possible inconsistent responses. The experimental study carried out on the different data collections, as well as the analysis of the results obtained, confirm the performance of our approach as well as its efficiency in regards to productivity and complexity in terms of execution time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Journal of King Faisal University
Scientific Journal of King Faisal University Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The scientific Journal of King Faisal University is a biannual refereed scientific journal issued under the guidance of the University Scientific Council. The journal also publishes special and supplementary issues when needed. The first volume was published on 1420H-2000G. The journal publishes two separate issues: Humanities and Management Sciences issue, classified in the Arab Impact Factor index, and Basic and Applied Sciences issue, on June and December, and indexed in (C​ABI) and (SCOPUS) international databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信