沉船该怪谁?阿奎那论神圣的善、恶与自由

IF 0.7 0 RELIGION
P. Roszak
{"title":"沉船该怪谁?阿奎那论神圣的善、恶与自由","authors":"P. Roszak","doi":"10.34291/bv2022/02/roszak","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This paper presents the basic features of Aquinas’ theodicy, first indicating some difficulties regarding the problem of evil—or even attempts to implicate God in evil —that have emerged in the wake of scientific achievements, especially in the field of evolutionary biology. What is needed in response to these challenges is an appropriate view of God’s causality, which is analogous in character and does not constitute one of many causalities in the world. A correct understanding of the relationship between the First Cause and secondary causes sheds new light on the debate about the Creator’s responsibility for evil in the world. For Aquinas, God’s action is focused on the good of the whole, which is why the notion of integrity or rectitude, which was already present in Paradise, explains the accidental—not intentional—presence of evil in the world. Against that background, the paper explains God’s manner of re-sponding to evil as interpreted by Thomas Aquinas, which consists in conque-ring evil with the greater good, its paradigm being the Incarnation. For a Christian, this is a model example of how a man can conquer evil by strengthening good and persisting in it through cooperation with grace.","PeriodicalId":45019,"journal":{"name":"Bogoslovni Vestnik-Theological Quarterly-Ephemerides Theologicae","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who Is to Blame for the Sinking Ship? Aquinas on Divine Goodness, Evil and Freedom\",\"authors\":\"P. Roszak\",\"doi\":\"10.34291/bv2022/02/roszak\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": This paper presents the basic features of Aquinas’ theodicy, first indicating some difficulties regarding the problem of evil—or even attempts to implicate God in evil —that have emerged in the wake of scientific achievements, especially in the field of evolutionary biology. What is needed in response to these challenges is an appropriate view of God’s causality, which is analogous in character and does not constitute one of many causalities in the world. A correct understanding of the relationship between the First Cause and secondary causes sheds new light on the debate about the Creator’s responsibility for evil in the world. For Aquinas, God’s action is focused on the good of the whole, which is why the notion of integrity or rectitude, which was already present in Paradise, explains the accidental—not intentional—presence of evil in the world. Against that background, the paper explains God’s manner of re-sponding to evil as interpreted by Thomas Aquinas, which consists in conque-ring evil with the greater good, its paradigm being the Incarnation. For a Christian, this is a model example of how a man can conquer evil by strengthening good and persisting in it through cooperation with grace.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bogoslovni Vestnik-Theological Quarterly-Ephemerides Theologicae\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bogoslovni Vestnik-Theological Quarterly-Ephemerides Theologicae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34291/bv2022/02/roszak\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bogoslovni Vestnik-Theological Quarterly-Ephemerides Theologicae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34291/bv2022/02/roszak","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文介绍了阿奎那神正论的基本特征,首先指出了一些关于邪恶问题的困难,甚至试图将上帝与邪恶联系起来,这些问题随着科学成就,特别是在进化生物学领域的成就而出现。为了应对这些挑战,我们需要对上帝的因果关系有一个适当的看法,这种观点在性质上是类似的,而不是构成世界上许多因果关系之一。对第一因和第二因之间关系的正确理解,为关于造物主对世界上罪恶的责任的争论提供了新的启示。对于阿奎那来说,上帝的行动集中在整体的善上,这就是为什么正直或正直的概念,已经出现在乐园里,解释了世界上邪恶的偶然而不是故意的存在。在此背景下,本文解释了托马斯·阿奎那所解释的上帝回应邪恶的方式,即以更大的善征服邪恶,其范式是化身。对基督徒来说,这是一个榜样,说明一个人如何通过加强善,并通过与恩典合作而坚持下去,从而战胜邪恶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who Is to Blame for the Sinking Ship? Aquinas on Divine Goodness, Evil and Freedom
: This paper presents the basic features of Aquinas’ theodicy, first indicating some difficulties regarding the problem of evil—or even attempts to implicate God in evil —that have emerged in the wake of scientific achievements, especially in the field of evolutionary biology. What is needed in response to these challenges is an appropriate view of God’s causality, which is analogous in character and does not constitute one of many causalities in the world. A correct understanding of the relationship between the First Cause and secondary causes sheds new light on the debate about the Creator’s responsibility for evil in the world. For Aquinas, God’s action is focused on the good of the whole, which is why the notion of integrity or rectitude, which was already present in Paradise, explains the accidental—not intentional—presence of evil in the world. Against that background, the paper explains God’s manner of re-sponding to evil as interpreted by Thomas Aquinas, which consists in conque-ring evil with the greater good, its paradigm being the Incarnation. For a Christian, this is a model example of how a man can conquer evil by strengthening good and persisting in it through cooperation with grace.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信