“斯洛文尼亚共产主义的高级神职人员主义”:Tine Hribar心中反马克思主义与反基督教的交织

IF 0.7 0 RELIGION
Matic Kocijančič
{"title":"“斯洛文尼亚共产主义的高级神职人员主义”:Tine Hribar心中反马克思主义与反基督教的交织","authors":"Matic Kocijančič","doi":"10.34291/bv2022/02/kocijancic","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 1980s, Tine Hribar devised a unique philosophical project that in many regards relies on his influential interpretation of the Antigone myth. In a number of key places, this project is articulated as an antithesis to Marxist ideology on the one hand, and to Christian tradition on the other. The present paper demonstrates that these two critical stances of Hribar’s are not in equilibrium; rather, Hribar’s confrontation with Christianity, which goes back to his student days in the early 1960s, is central, whereas his anti-Marxism, which developed at the turn of the 1970s and 1980s, is embedded in the structure of that confrontation. This relationship is further complicated by the fact that Hribar’s antiChristian stance took its characteristic form precisely in his youthful Marxist period.","PeriodicalId":45019,"journal":{"name":"Bogoslovni Vestnik-Theological Quarterly-Ephemerides Theologicae","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"»Visokoekspertna klerikalnost slovenskega komunizma«: preplet antimarksizma in antikrščanstva v misli Tineta Hribarja\",\"authors\":\"Matic Kocijančič\",\"doi\":\"10.34291/bv2022/02/kocijancic\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the 1980s, Tine Hribar devised a unique philosophical project that in many regards relies on his influential interpretation of the Antigone myth. In a number of key places, this project is articulated as an antithesis to Marxist ideology on the one hand, and to Christian tradition on the other. The present paper demonstrates that these two critical stances of Hribar’s are not in equilibrium; rather, Hribar’s confrontation with Christianity, which goes back to his student days in the early 1960s, is central, whereas his anti-Marxism, which developed at the turn of the 1970s and 1980s, is embedded in the structure of that confrontation. This relationship is further complicated by the fact that Hribar’s antiChristian stance took its characteristic form precisely in his youthful Marxist period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bogoslovni Vestnik-Theological Quarterly-Ephemerides Theologicae\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bogoslovni Vestnik-Theological Quarterly-Ephemerides Theologicae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34291/bv2022/02/kocijancic\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bogoslovni Vestnik-Theological Quarterly-Ephemerides Theologicae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34291/bv2022/02/kocijancic","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在20世纪80年代,蒂娜·赫里巴尔设计了一个独特的哲学项目,在许多方面依赖于他对安提戈涅神话的有影响力的解释。在一些关键的地方,这个计划一方面是马克思主义意识形态的对立面,另一方面是基督教传统的对立面。本文证明了Hribar的这两个关键立场并不处于平衡状态;相反,赫里巴尔与基督教的对抗,可以追溯到20世纪60年代早期的学生时代,是核心,而他在20世纪70年代和80年代之交发展起来的反马克思主义,则嵌入在这种对抗的结构中。赫里巴尔的反基督教立场恰恰是在他年轻的马克思主义时期形成的,这一事实使这种关系进一步复杂化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
»Visokoekspertna klerikalnost slovenskega komunizma«: preplet antimarksizma in antikrščanstva v misli Tineta Hribarja
In the 1980s, Tine Hribar devised a unique philosophical project that in many regards relies on his influential interpretation of the Antigone myth. In a number of key places, this project is articulated as an antithesis to Marxist ideology on the one hand, and to Christian tradition on the other. The present paper demonstrates that these two critical stances of Hribar’s are not in equilibrium; rather, Hribar’s confrontation with Christianity, which goes back to his student days in the early 1960s, is central, whereas his anti-Marxism, which developed at the turn of the 1970s and 1980s, is embedded in the structure of that confrontation. This relationship is further complicated by the fact that Hribar’s antiChristian stance took its characteristic form precisely in his youthful Marxist period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信