父亲项目中有希望的实践要素:关于父亲干预的循证研究结果

Fathering Pub Date : 2012-01-01 DOI:10.3149/FTH.1001.6
Jacinta Bronte-Tinkew, Mary A. Burkhauser, Allison Metz
{"title":"父亲项目中有希望的实践要素:关于父亲干预的循证研究结果","authors":"Jacinta Bronte-Tinkew, Mary A. Burkhauser, Allison Metz","doi":"10.3149/FTH.1001.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last two decades there has been an increased societal and academic interest in the role of fathers, as well as promoting responsible fatherhood in families and communities. In turn, this interest has given rise to an increasing number of fatherhood interventions. Although many programs to support fatherhood exist, they often differ in terms of their goals, target populations, designs, methods of implementation and assessment. This article reviews key evaluation findings from fatherhood programs that have been rigorously evaluated (i.e., used random assignment design) in order to answer questions about “what works” in fatherhood programs. In so doing, it identifies elements of promising practice in programs considered effective. Conclusions about the state of research on the effectiveness of fatherhood interventions are also presented.","PeriodicalId":88482,"journal":{"name":"Fathering","volume":"10 1","pages":"6-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3149/FTH.1001.6","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ELEMENTS OF PROMISING PRACTICES IN FATHERHOOD PROGRAMS: EVIDENCE-BASED RESEARCH FINDINGS ON INTERVENTIONS FOR FATHERS\",\"authors\":\"Jacinta Bronte-Tinkew, Mary A. Burkhauser, Allison Metz\",\"doi\":\"10.3149/FTH.1001.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the last two decades there has been an increased societal and academic interest in the role of fathers, as well as promoting responsible fatherhood in families and communities. In turn, this interest has given rise to an increasing number of fatherhood interventions. Although many programs to support fatherhood exist, they often differ in terms of their goals, target populations, designs, methods of implementation and assessment. This article reviews key evaluation findings from fatherhood programs that have been rigorously evaluated (i.e., used random assignment design) in order to answer questions about “what works” in fatherhood programs. In so doing, it identifies elements of promising practice in programs considered effective. Conclusions about the state of research on the effectiveness of fatherhood interventions are also presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fathering\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"6-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3149/FTH.1001.6\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fathering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3149/FTH.1001.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fathering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3149/FTH.1001.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

摘要

在过去的二十年里,社会和学术界对父亲的角色以及在家庭和社区中促进负责任的父亲的兴趣越来越大。反过来,这种兴趣引起了越来越多的父亲干预。虽然存在许多支持父亲的方案,但它们在目标、目标人群、设计、实施和评估方法方面往往各不相同。本文回顾了严格评估(即使用随机分配设计)的父性项目的关键评估结果,以回答有关“什么在父性项目中有效”的问题。在这样做的过程中,它确定了被认为有效的项目中有前途的实践元素。最后,对父权干预有效性的研究现状进行了总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ELEMENTS OF PROMISING PRACTICES IN FATHERHOOD PROGRAMS: EVIDENCE-BASED RESEARCH FINDINGS ON INTERVENTIONS FOR FATHERS
Over the last two decades there has been an increased societal and academic interest in the role of fathers, as well as promoting responsible fatherhood in families and communities. In turn, this interest has given rise to an increasing number of fatherhood interventions. Although many programs to support fatherhood exist, they often differ in terms of their goals, target populations, designs, methods of implementation and assessment. This article reviews key evaluation findings from fatherhood programs that have been rigorously evaluated (i.e., used random assignment design) in order to answer questions about “what works” in fatherhood programs. In so doing, it identifies elements of promising practice in programs considered effective. Conclusions about the state of research on the effectiveness of fatherhood interventions are also presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信