做父亲是全职工作吗?测量全职父亲的混合方法

Fathering Pub Date : 2011-04-01 DOI:10.3149/FTH.0902.125
Beth A. Latshaw
{"title":"做父亲是全职工作吗?测量全职父亲的混合方法","authors":"Beth A. Latshaw","doi":"10.3149/FTH.0902.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Little is known about men who serve as primary caregivers for American families due to a lack of detailed questions on fatherhood and small numbers found in large-scale, nationally representative surveys. This paper moves beyond this limitation using a combination of in-depth interviews with 40 fathers and microdata from the 2005-2007 American Community Survey to critically assess whether the US Census Bureau accurately counts the number of male primary caregivers. Findings suggest that it likely underestimates the number who care full-time, by as many as 1.4 million, by not counting fathers who work part-time, report other reasons for being home and/or have been home less than one year. These results have important implications for how scholars more precisely measure emergent, transitioning forms of fatherhood.","PeriodicalId":88482,"journal":{"name":"Fathering","volume":"9 1","pages":"125-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Fatherhood a Full-Time Job? Mixed Methods Insights into Measuring Stay-at-Home Fatherhood\",\"authors\":\"Beth A. Latshaw\",\"doi\":\"10.3149/FTH.0902.125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Little is known about men who serve as primary caregivers for American families due to a lack of detailed questions on fatherhood and small numbers found in large-scale, nationally representative surveys. This paper moves beyond this limitation using a combination of in-depth interviews with 40 fathers and microdata from the 2005-2007 American Community Survey to critically assess whether the US Census Bureau accurately counts the number of male primary caregivers. Findings suggest that it likely underestimates the number who care full-time, by as many as 1.4 million, by not counting fathers who work part-time, report other reasons for being home and/or have been home less than one year. These results have important implications for how scholars more precisely measure emergent, transitioning forms of fatherhood.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fathering\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"125-149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"41\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fathering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3149/FTH.0902.125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fathering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3149/FTH.0902.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

摘要

由于缺乏关于父亲身份的详细问题,而且在大规模的、具有全国代表性的调查中发现的人数很少,人们对美国家庭中主要照顾者的男性知之甚少。本文利用对40位父亲的深度访谈和2005-2007年美国社区调查的微观数据,突破了这一局限,批判性地评估了美国人口普查局是否准确地计算了男性主要照顾者的数量。研究结果表明,由于不包括兼职父亲、报告其他在家的原因和/或在家不到一年的父亲,该调查可能低估了全职照顾孩子的人数,多达140万人。这些结果对学者们如何更精确地衡量出现的、过渡的父亲身份形式具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Fatherhood a Full-Time Job? Mixed Methods Insights into Measuring Stay-at-Home Fatherhood
Little is known about men who serve as primary caregivers for American families due to a lack of detailed questions on fatherhood and small numbers found in large-scale, nationally representative surveys. This paper moves beyond this limitation using a combination of in-depth interviews with 40 fathers and microdata from the 2005-2007 American Community Survey to critically assess whether the US Census Bureau accurately counts the number of male primary caregivers. Findings suggest that it likely underestimates the number who care full-time, by as many as 1.4 million, by not counting fathers who work part-time, report other reasons for being home and/or have been home less than one year. These results have important implications for how scholars more precisely measure emergent, transitioning forms of fatherhood.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信