{"title":"基辅哲学学派的社会政治形象:从内部抵抗到开放态度","authors":"H. Vdovychenko","doi":"10.29202/up/7/10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the specifics of the socio-political image of the Kyiv philosophical school of the second half of the 20 th century as an innovative academic project of directors of the Institute of Philosophy of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR, Academicians P. Kopnin and V. Shynkaruk. Their democratic vision of the foundations of educational and scientific processes in the Ukrainian SSR during the Khrushchev thaw was fruitfully embodied by the illustrious generation of the creators of this school or philosophers of the sixties. The study of a significant part of their memories, mainly realized in T. Chaika’s project “The Philosophers’ Oral Histories” a series of autobiographical reconstructions by Academicians S. Krymskyi, V. Horskyi, M. Popovych, as well as the ones of their colleagues S. Proleev and Y. Stratii, carried out thanks to the Student Society of Oral History of Philosophy, organized at the Department of the History of Philosophy of the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, testifies to the manifestation of a wide range of their civic stands from apolitical non-conformism to nationally oriented dissidence. An analysis of the memories of these members of the two most non-conforming departments of the said institute, namely of the History of philosophy in Ukraine and of the Logic and methodology of science, as well as the memoirs of their colleagues, primarily V. Lisovyi, allows us to recognize the Kyiv philosophical school as a domestic academic micromodel-prototype of an open society with its apparent: democracy, opposition to xenophobia, primarily to anti-Semitism and Ukrainophobia, resistance to official dogmatization of state ideology, openness to international experience in the context of direct dialogue and, which is fundamentally important, awareness of their role in the study and preservation of the spiritual, primarily philosophical, experience of the Ukrainian people and all ethnic groups in Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":52964,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Policymaker","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socio-Political Image of the Kyiv Philosophical School: from Internal Resistance to Open Attitude\",\"authors\":\"H. Vdovychenko\",\"doi\":\"10.29202/up/7/10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article deals with the specifics of the socio-political image of the Kyiv philosophical school of the second half of the 20 th century as an innovative academic project of directors of the Institute of Philosophy of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR, Academicians P. Kopnin and V. Shynkaruk. Their democratic vision of the foundations of educational and scientific processes in the Ukrainian SSR during the Khrushchev thaw was fruitfully embodied by the illustrious generation of the creators of this school or philosophers of the sixties. The study of a significant part of their memories, mainly realized in T. Chaika’s project “The Philosophers’ Oral Histories” a series of autobiographical reconstructions by Academicians S. Krymskyi, V. Horskyi, M. Popovych, as well as the ones of their colleagues S. Proleev and Y. Stratii, carried out thanks to the Student Society of Oral History of Philosophy, organized at the Department of the History of Philosophy of the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, testifies to the manifestation of a wide range of their civic stands from apolitical non-conformism to nationally oriented dissidence. An analysis of the memories of these members of the two most non-conforming departments of the said institute, namely of the History of philosophy in Ukraine and of the Logic and methodology of science, as well as the memoirs of their colleagues, primarily V. Lisovyi, allows us to recognize the Kyiv philosophical school as a domestic academic micromodel-prototype of an open society with its apparent: democracy, opposition to xenophobia, primarily to anti-Semitism and Ukrainophobia, resistance to official dogmatization of state ideology, openness to international experience in the context of direct dialogue and, which is fundamentally important, awareness of their role in the study and preservation of the spiritual, primarily philosophical, experience of the Ukrainian people and all ethnic groups in Ukraine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ukrainian Policymaker\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ukrainian Policymaker\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29202/up/7/10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Policymaker","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29202/up/7/10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
本文探讨了20世纪下半叶基辅哲学学派作为乌克兰苏维埃社会主义共和国科学院哲学研究所所长P. Kopnin和V. Shynkaruk院士的创新学术项目的社会政治形象的具体内容。他们对赫鲁晓夫解冻时期乌克兰苏维埃社会主义共和国教育和科学进程基础的民主愿景,在这一学派的杰出一代创造者或60年代的哲学家身上得到了富有成效的体现。对他们记忆的重要部分的研究,主要是在T. Chaika的项目“哲学家的口述历史”中实现的,这是一系列由S. Krymskyi, V. Horskyi, M. Popovych院士以及他们的同事S. Proleev和Y. Stratii进行的自传重建,感谢在基辅塔拉斯舍甫琴科国立大学哲学系组织的哲学口述历史学生协会。证明了他们广泛的公民立场的表现,从非政治的不墨守成规到以国家为导向的异议。对上述研究所两个最不一致的部门,即乌克兰哲学史和科学逻辑和方法论部门的这些成员的记忆进行分析,以及他们的同事(主要是V. Lisovyi)的回忆录,使我们能够认识到基辅哲学学派是一个国内学术微观模型-开放社会的原型,其明显:民主,反对仇外心理,主要是反对反犹太主义和乌克兰恐惧症,反对官方对国家意识形态的教条化,在直接对话的背景下对国际经验持开放态度,以及至关重要的是,认识到他们在研究和保存乌克兰人民和乌克兰所有族裔的精神经验,主要是哲学经验方面的作用。
Socio-Political Image of the Kyiv Philosophical School: from Internal Resistance to Open Attitude
The article deals with the specifics of the socio-political image of the Kyiv philosophical school of the second half of the 20 th century as an innovative academic project of directors of the Institute of Philosophy of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR, Academicians P. Kopnin and V. Shynkaruk. Their democratic vision of the foundations of educational and scientific processes in the Ukrainian SSR during the Khrushchev thaw was fruitfully embodied by the illustrious generation of the creators of this school or philosophers of the sixties. The study of a significant part of their memories, mainly realized in T. Chaika’s project “The Philosophers’ Oral Histories” a series of autobiographical reconstructions by Academicians S. Krymskyi, V. Horskyi, M. Popovych, as well as the ones of their colleagues S. Proleev and Y. Stratii, carried out thanks to the Student Society of Oral History of Philosophy, organized at the Department of the History of Philosophy of the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, testifies to the manifestation of a wide range of their civic stands from apolitical non-conformism to nationally oriented dissidence. An analysis of the memories of these members of the two most non-conforming departments of the said institute, namely of the History of philosophy in Ukraine and of the Logic and methodology of science, as well as the memoirs of their colleagues, primarily V. Lisovyi, allows us to recognize the Kyiv philosophical school as a domestic academic micromodel-prototype of an open society with its apparent: democracy, opposition to xenophobia, primarily to anti-Semitism and Ukrainophobia, resistance to official dogmatization of state ideology, openness to international experience in the context of direct dialogue and, which is fundamentally important, awareness of their role in the study and preservation of the spiritual, primarily philosophical, experience of the Ukrainian people and all ethnic groups in Ukraine.