反对自由民主和开放社会价值观的信息和数字工具

V. Filipchuk
{"title":"反对自由民主和开放社会价值观的信息和数字工具","authors":"V. Filipchuk","doi":"10.29202/up/5/4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyses the information and digital toolset in a fight against liberal democracy and values of open society. The overall trend of the present world development is such that transition to the post-industrial society, with its inherent variety of interests and values of different social groups and organizations, impetuous development of information technologies, etc. leads to transformation of political institutes of democracy. In connection to this, modern democracy faces serious challenges. Demands to its efficiency and associated expectations have grown, while the ability of democratic states to solve development problems has not changed much. Inversion of democracy is also related with globalization and striving for comprehensive security. The decline of people’s trust in the institutes of modern democracy; permanent growth of expectations from the regulatory capabilities of politics against the background of minimization of the idea of responsibility; the growing role of mass media and new uncontrolled decision-making centers that enter a competition with democratically legitimized institutes lead to atomization of society, its transformation into a set of autonomous information communities, giving rise to the “democracy of minorities”, on the one hand, and to а democratic global government, on the other. To survive, democracy needs continuous flexible adaptation to external and internal challenges, as a long-term project. Its future lies in change, rather than in the desire to preserve stability.","PeriodicalId":52964,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Policymaker","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information and Digital Toolset in a Fight against Liberal Democracy and Values of Open Society\",\"authors\":\"V. Filipchuk\",\"doi\":\"10.29202/up/5/4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper analyses the information and digital toolset in a fight against liberal democracy and values of open society. The overall trend of the present world development is such that transition to the post-industrial society, with its inherent variety of interests and values of different social groups and organizations, impetuous development of information technologies, etc. leads to transformation of political institutes of democracy. In connection to this, modern democracy faces serious challenges. Demands to its efficiency and associated expectations have grown, while the ability of democratic states to solve development problems has not changed much. Inversion of democracy is also related with globalization and striving for comprehensive security. The decline of people’s trust in the institutes of modern democracy; permanent growth of expectations from the regulatory capabilities of politics against the background of minimization of the idea of responsibility; the growing role of mass media and new uncontrolled decision-making centers that enter a competition with democratically legitimized institutes lead to atomization of society, its transformation into a set of autonomous information communities, giving rise to the “democracy of minorities”, on the one hand, and to а democratic global government, on the other. To survive, democracy needs continuous flexible adaptation to external and internal challenges, as a long-term project. Its future lies in change, rather than in the desire to preserve stability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ukrainian Policymaker\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ukrainian Policymaker\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29202/up/5/4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Policymaker","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29202/up/5/4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文分析了在与自由民主和开放社会价值观的斗争中使用的信息和数字工具。当今世界发展的总体趋势是,向后工业社会过渡,不同社会群体和组织的利益和价值观存在内在的多样性,信息技术的迅猛发展等,导致了民主政治制度的转型。在这方面,现代民主面临着严峻的挑战。对其效率的要求和相关期望有所增加,而民主国家解决发展问题的能力却没有太大变化。民主倒转也与全球化和争取综合安全有关。人们对现代民主机构信任度的下降;在责任观念最小化的背景下,政治调控能力带来期望的永久增长;大众传媒的作用日益增强,新的不受控制的决策中心与民主合法化的机构竞争,导致社会的原子化,社会转变为一系列自主的信息社区,一方面产生了“少数民族的民主”,另一方面产生了民主的全球政府。为了生存,民主需要作为一项长期项目,不断灵活地适应外部和内部的挑战。它的未来在于变革,而不是维持稳定的愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Information and Digital Toolset in a Fight against Liberal Democracy and Values of Open Society
The paper analyses the information and digital toolset in a fight against liberal democracy and values of open society. The overall trend of the present world development is such that transition to the post-industrial society, with its inherent variety of interests and values of different social groups and organizations, impetuous development of information technologies, etc. leads to transformation of political institutes of democracy. In connection to this, modern democracy faces serious challenges. Demands to its efficiency and associated expectations have grown, while the ability of democratic states to solve development problems has not changed much. Inversion of democracy is also related with globalization and striving for comprehensive security. The decline of people’s trust in the institutes of modern democracy; permanent growth of expectations from the regulatory capabilities of politics against the background of minimization of the idea of responsibility; the growing role of mass media and new uncontrolled decision-making centers that enter a competition with democratically legitimized institutes lead to atomization of society, its transformation into a set of autonomous information communities, giving rise to the “democracy of minorities”, on the one hand, and to а democratic global government, on the other. To survive, democracy needs continuous flexible adaptation to external and internal challenges, as a long-term project. Its future lies in change, rather than in the desire to preserve stability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信