{"title":"马克斯·乌尔-胡里奥·特洛:秘鲁考古学形成中的学术政治争论","authors":"Alejandra Ramos","doi":"10.34096/RUNA.V34I2.643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Max Uhle (1856-1944) and Julio Tello (1880-1947) made prominent contributions to the development of Peruvian archaeology in the first half of the 20th century, coinciding at some points and differing in others. Their contrasting academic proposals were linked to political positions, which in turn impacted the way of imagining the development of Peruvian archaeology. The article analyzes how the interdependence in the characterizations of Uhle and Tello led to the formation of a mirrored logic, placing them in two poles that condense positive and negative assessments, respectively. Finally, we explore the passage from the opposition of both figures to the construction of exclusive and nationality-dependent ways of doing research.","PeriodicalId":30160,"journal":{"name":"Runa","volume":"34 1","pages":"197-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Max Uhle-Julio Tello: Una polémica académico-política en la conformación de la Arqueología Peruana\",\"authors\":\"Alejandra Ramos\",\"doi\":\"10.34096/RUNA.V34I2.643\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Max Uhle (1856-1944) and Julio Tello (1880-1947) made prominent contributions to the development of Peruvian archaeology in the first half of the 20th century, coinciding at some points and differing in others. Their contrasting academic proposals were linked to political positions, which in turn impacted the way of imagining the development of Peruvian archaeology. The article analyzes how the interdependence in the characterizations of Uhle and Tello led to the formation of a mirrored logic, placing them in two poles that condense positive and negative assessments, respectively. Finally, we explore the passage from the opposition of both figures to the construction of exclusive and nationality-dependent ways of doing research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Runa\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"197-214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Runa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34096/RUNA.V34I2.643\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Runa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34096/RUNA.V34I2.643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
Max Uhle(1856-1944)和Julio Tello(1880-1947)在20世纪上半叶对秘鲁考古学的发展做出了杰出的贡献,他们在某些方面是一致的,在其他方面则有所不同。他们截然不同的学术建议与政治立场有关,这反过来又影响了对秘鲁考古学发展的想象方式。本文分析了乌勒和泰罗在性格刻画上的相互依赖是如何导致镜像逻辑的形成的,将他们分别置于两个极点,分别浓缩了积极和消极的评价。最后,我们探讨了从这两个人物的对立到建构排他性和民族性的研究方式的过程。
Max Uhle-Julio Tello: Una polémica académico-política en la conformación de la Arqueología Peruana
Max Uhle (1856-1944) and Julio Tello (1880-1947) made prominent contributions to the development of Peruvian archaeology in the first half of the 20th century, coinciding at some points and differing in others. Their contrasting academic proposals were linked to political positions, which in turn impacted the way of imagining the development of Peruvian archaeology. The article analyzes how the interdependence in the characterizations of Uhle and Tello led to the formation of a mirrored logic, placing them in two poles that condense positive and negative assessments, respectively. Finally, we explore the passage from the opposition of both figures to the construction of exclusive and nationality-dependent ways of doing research.