媒体在不同民族志领域的存在:新的研究可能性

Runa Pub Date : 2013-07-30 DOI:10.34096/RUNA.V34I2.639
N. Magalhaes
{"title":"媒体在不同民族志领域的存在:新的研究可能性","authors":"N. Magalhaes","doi":"10.34096/RUNA.V34I2.639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reflects on the invisibility of television fostered by the silence in the description of research participants’ practices, when fieldwork does not directly address mass culture. To what extent is the practice of watching television socially delegitimized and thus, not always referred to in the everyday practices and significant gestures considered part of a culture? In a context of diversity and multiculturalism, what concept(s) of culture is (are) serving as the basis for anthropological discussion of the meanings of mass communication —its production, processes, messages and re-elaborations? Are there shared assumptions about the superiority of literate culture when mass media is discussed, even when the receiver is considered a subject in the communication process?These and other questions will be addressed with the objective of outlining new hypotheses for future research on mass communication from an anthropological perspective.","PeriodicalId":30160,"journal":{"name":"Runa","volume":"34 1","pages":"135-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Presencia de los medios en distintos campos etnográficos: nuevas posibilidades de investigación\",\"authors\":\"N. Magalhaes\",\"doi\":\"10.34096/RUNA.V34I2.639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article reflects on the invisibility of television fostered by the silence in the description of research participants’ practices, when fieldwork does not directly address mass culture. To what extent is the practice of watching television socially delegitimized and thus, not always referred to in the everyday practices and significant gestures considered part of a culture? In a context of diversity and multiculturalism, what concept(s) of culture is (are) serving as the basis for anthropological discussion of the meanings of mass communication —its production, processes, messages and re-elaborations? Are there shared assumptions about the superiority of literate culture when mass media is discussed, even when the receiver is considered a subject in the communication process?These and other questions will be addressed with the objective of outlining new hypotheses for future research on mass communication from an anthropological perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Runa\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"135-148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Runa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34096/RUNA.V34I2.639\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Runa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34096/RUNA.V34I2.639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章反映了当田野调查不直接涉及大众文化时,在研究参与者的实践描述中,由于沉默而助长了电视的隐形性。在多大程度上,看电视的做法在社会上是不合法的,因此,在日常实践和被认为是文化一部分的重要姿态中并不总是被提及?在多样性和多元文化主义的背景下,什么样的文化概念是大众传播意义的人类学讨论的基础——它的生产、过程、信息和重新阐述?在讨论大众传媒时,即使受众被认为是传播过程中的主体,人们是否对文学文化的优越性有共同的假设?这些问题和其他问题将被处理,目的是从人类学的角度概述未来大众传播研究的新假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Presencia de los medios en distintos campos etnográficos: nuevas posibilidades de investigación
This article reflects on the invisibility of television fostered by the silence in the description of research participants’ practices, when fieldwork does not directly address mass culture. To what extent is the practice of watching television socially delegitimized and thus, not always referred to in the everyday practices and significant gestures considered part of a culture? In a context of diversity and multiculturalism, what concept(s) of culture is (are) serving as the basis for anthropological discussion of the meanings of mass communication —its production, processes, messages and re-elaborations? Are there shared assumptions about the superiority of literate culture when mass media is discussed, even when the receiver is considered a subject in the communication process?These and other questions will be addressed with the objective of outlining new hypotheses for future research on mass communication from an anthropological perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信